Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumComparing 2015 2nd Quarter fundraising to 2007
2007$33 Obama
$27 Clinton
$9 Edwards
$7 Richardson
$3.2 Dodd
$2.45 Biden
$757K Kucinich
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/07/16/clinton-obama-edwards-bank-almost-100-million
2015
$45 Clinton
>$7.4 Sanders
The rest TBA
I was initially going to post that Sanders raised a good amount of money and it will make him credible. Then I saw that Richardson raised almost as much in 2007 and we know how that turned out.
Still, I think the $7.4 is a nice chunk of change and enough to mount a fairly credible campaign. They can't buy the airwaves in every market, but they have resources to use.
The big question is can they keep it up, and has Sanders been fundraising to his full potential.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comparing 2015 2nd Quarter fundraising to 2007 (Original Post)
Renew Deal
Jul 2015
OP
It costs less to compete with one other rival, and his message is clear enough
CanadaexPat
Jul 2015
#4
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)1. I tend to agree with Mia Farrow's twitter post tonight.
https://twitter.com/MiaFarrow/status/616287096492425216
BTW I think Bernie's figures are higher by now, but nowhere near 45 million.
mia farrow retweeted Los Angeles Times
This is not ok! A qualified person should not need $45m to be President. #ugh
mia farrow added,
Los Angeles Times @latimes
Hillary Clinton on track to raise a record $45m, dwarfing what next-closest rival, Bernie Sanders, is likely to raise http://lat.ms/1Hxe5NZ
BTW I think Bernie's figures are higher by now, but nowhere near 45 million.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)3. What they need and what they get are different stories.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)2. 7 million is not enough. He needs more money if he wants to win.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)5. you hope
but a modern candidate may not need much
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)6. A modern candidate will need more money.
It is sad but true.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)7. only if they run a traditional inefficient campaign...
which Bernie will not.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)8. Well he will have to prove that.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)9. that is when creativity occurs
too much money can lead to thinking in a conventional way
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)4. It costs less to compete with one other rival, and his message is clear enough
and the contrast strong enough that it doesn't take a lot of explaining or fancy footwork to get through.