2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMarijuana Report Card: How Presidential Candidates Scored From A to F
Longer than usual excerpt posted by permission.
http://www.alternet.org/drugs/grading-presidential-candidates-marijuana-policy
Marijuana is already legal in Alaska, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Oregon (as of Wednesday), and Washington. With legalization initiatives looming this year and next in states as diverse as Michigan, Ohio, Maine, Massachusetts, California, Nevada, and Arizona, marijuana policy is most definitely on the agenda in the 2016 presidential election campaign.
Candidates and presumed candidates from both parties have staked out a wide array of positions on the issue (although none have taken the bold step of actually advocating for legalization). Now, thanks to the Marijuana Policy Project, we have a scorecard to keep them all straight.
The pro-legalization advocacy group has released its Voters Guide to the 2016 Presidential Race, detailing the candidates positions on marijuana policy and assigning them grades based on where they stand. The candidates were graded on actions they have taken and statements they have made indicating their support for ending pot prohibition, allowing legal access to medical marijuana and defending states' rights to set their own marijuana policies.
"Most Americans recognize that marijuana is less harmful than alcohol and they think it should be made legal for adults," said MPP spokesperson Mason Tvert. "Voters should know which candidates support rolling back prohibition and which ones are fighting to maintain it. People are becoming increasingly wary of the federal governments role in our nations marijuana policies."
Protecting the ability of states to set their own marijuana policies will be increasingly important in coming years, Tvert said, adding that, "Several states are likely to adopt new approaches to marijuana policy between now and when our next president takes office. She or he should be willing to work with Congress to ease the tension between state and federal marijuana laws. If states are to be our nations laboratories of democracy, our next president needs to respect their right to experiment. They should also be committed to basing marijuana laws on science and evidence instead of ideology and politics."
While Democratic candidates found themselves in the middle of the road (with grades ranging from B to D), Republicans were all over the letter-grade spectrum, with Rand Paul pulling down an A- (it seems you'd have to actually support legalization to get an A grade from MPP), and two GOP candidates, Christ Christie and Rick Santorum getting flunked with Fs.
"Some of these guys who tout states rights, fiscal responsibility, and getting the government out of peoples private lives want to use federal tax dollars to punish adults for using marijuana in states that have made it legal," Tvert said. "They say using marijuana is immoral or just too dangerous to allow, but serve alcohol, a more dangerous substance, at their fundraisers. The hypocrisy is astonishing."
------
Click on the link to see the actual grades for each candidate.
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)Access denied.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)SamKnause
(13,110 posts)Thanks
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)FSogol
(45,526 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Bernie B... Hillary B minus.
oh and fuck rand
FSogol
(45,526 posts)actual pot legislation. I would see it the other way around since legislation leads to changes while talk is just talk.
O'Malley decriminalized it and allowed medical uses, but held off on recreation use. He said that Oregon and Colorado are the test cases and that Maryland should wait and see.