2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumObama a socialist? Many scoff, but claim persists
"Forward," they asserted, is a word long associated with Europe's radical left. Its choice reaffirmed their contention that Obama is, to some degree or other, a socialist a claim that surfaced early in the 2008 campaign and has persisted ever since, fueling a lively industry of bumper stickers and books..
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-socialist-many-scoff-claim-persists-174845832.html
You got it, folks. 'Forward' is now a bad word.
So then, the word that describes republickers is....'backward'?
Skinner
(63,645 posts)No way!
Iggo
(47,561 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)that Buddha has a ghost penis that lives in your cereal.
ilikeitthatway
(143 posts)Socialism saved the US, and while Obama isn't a Socialist, America would be in much better shape if we went back to it like under FDR. Dems have done this before with the word "Liberal". Stop letting the Right make Left wing ideology the boogie man. Socialism isn't Communism.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . it just goes from Merely Fucking Dumb to Nuclear Vaporization Dumb in 1 minute.
Yahoo's amazingly brain-deficient Komment Kleegle is proof positive we should be draining the PentaSewer of all funding and put it towards education. This is what happens when your population goes willfully ignorant on you.
LiberalFighter
(51,005 posts)It's motto is "Forward".
Brigid
(17,621 posts)"You say 'socialiast' like it's a bad thing."
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,422 posts)Most people don't even known what "socialism" really is. The low info voters just hear the Republicans use it against President Obama and assume that it's something bad/evil/un-American and that they should be against it. The truth is, however, if most people understood what it actually is, that it exists in some form already in this country, and that people in Canada and in Europe do quite well under a "socialist" system, more people would actually be proud to have a "socialist" POTUS.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,422 posts)President Obama should just say that we're going to take the country BACKWARDS and then he wouldn't be a "socialist" then, right?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)One of the older stories actually went to the head of the SPUSA for comment...It was at least interesting to see them interviewed for a change....
dhpgetsit
(1,917 posts)This is his remarks at the 2004 RNC.
http://mittromneycentral.com/speeches/2004-speeches/090104-remarks-to-the-2004-republican-national-convention/
Dr Fate
(32,189 posts)This "socialism" that tax payers such as Mitt Romney live under sounds pretty cool- where do I sign up?