Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 07:52 AM Jul 2015

Martin O'Malley Releases Scathing Open Letter to Wall St.: 'I Will Not Let Up On You'

Last edited Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:04 AM - Edit history (1)

"I know that many of you have tried to dismiss and undermine my calls for stronger reforms as 'anti-capitalist.' Let me be clear- the ongoing reckless behavior of your megabanks isn’t capitalism—it’s the antithesis of it," O'Malley wrote. "True capitalism requires a level playing field on which everyone plays by the same set of rules. True capitalism requires competition. True capitalism means that just as businesses and banks can succeed—they can also fail."


In his letter, O'Malley describes the "megabanks" as an "grave threat" to the US economy with executives that are "somehow classified as too big to prosecute and too big to jail."

"Today, your—too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-manage, and too-big-to-jail—megabanks pose an enormous risk to the financial system, the economy, and American families. They are so big and so interconnected with the entire financial system that the failure of one or more of them could cause the collapse of the entire U.S. economy," O'Malley wrote.


According to his deputy campaign manager Lis Smith, on Thursday, along with the letter, O'Malley will release a "detailed Wall Street white paper that continues in mold of O'Malley leading with bold, progressive policy agenda."

read: http://www.businessinsider.com/martin-omalleys-open-letter-to-wall-street-2015-7


FROM: Governor Martin O’Malley

DATE: July, 9 2015


As you may have read, I’ve expressed grave concern about the state of our national economy, especially as it relates to the behavior of a select group of financial institutions on Wall Street—the institutions that you work for and represent. I have called for significant structural and accountability reforms—like reinstating Glass-Steagall and increasing enforcement at the SEC, DOJ, and other agencies and departments—to prevent another economic crash and protect hard-working families from losing their jobs, homes, and life savings once again.

Most of our financial system works quite well. Of the almost 6,500 banks in our country, most of which work hard every day to serve their communities, just 29 have more than $100 billion in assets and only four have more than $1 trillion in assets. The high-risk, reckless, and illegal activities of your megabanks were the primary cause of the 2008 crash, which caused the worst recession since The Great Depression, and cost the American economy an estimated $14 trillion to $22 trillion.

I know that many of you have tried to dismiss and undermine my calls for stronger reforms as "anti-capitalist." Let me be clear- the ongoing reckless behavior of your megabanks isn’t capitalism—it’s the antithesis of it. True capitalism requires a level playing field on which everyone plays by the same set of rules. True capitalism requires competition. True capitalism means that just as businesses and banks can succeed—they can also fail.

Today, your—too-big-to-fail, too-big-to-manage, and too-big-to-jail—megabanks pose an enormous risk to the financial system, the economy, and American families. They are so big and so interconnected with the entire financial system that the failure of one or more of them could cause the collapse of the entire U.S. economy.

After several misguided deregulatory measures taken in the 1990’s, your handful of megabanks went from having assets of approximately 15% of our country’s GDP to now having assets of nearly 65% of our GDP. As your megabanks grew in size, who gained from it? Credit card fees didn’t get smaller. Mortgage rates didn’t go down. The median wages of Americans certainly didn’t increase. The only tangible gain we’ve seen from your institutions’ explosion in size is your ability to concentrate unprecedented power and wealth in the hands of your executives and to acquire the guarantee that all of your risky bets will be covered by taxpayers.

Now, because your institutions are so large, so leveraged, and pose such a grave threat to our economy, you don’t face the same rules of the free market that apply to everyone else. If your bets go bad, you don’t face bankruptcy—taxpayers bail you out. When things go well, the upside is all yours and you get to cash in exorbitant bonuses. This violates the very principle of free market capitalism.

For similar reasons, both your megabanks—and your executives—have been somehow classified as too big to prosecute and too big to jail. Exacerbating the problem, our financial regulation system is defined by conflicts of interest and a lucrative revolving door. Former financial executives are hired to regulate their former colleagues and, when they leave for government, they’re given golden parachutes. Then, they turn right around and return to the firms they were supposed to be regulating.

All of this explains why, when laws are broken, you and your institutions get off with nothing more than a slap on the wrist—fines paid by shareholders that you can write off as nothing more than business expenses. No admission of guilt, no one faces jail time, everybody keeps their jobs -- back to bonuses as usual.

As President, I would end this double standard of justice. It is bad for our economy, and it is bad for our country.

A strong American economy depends on a strong, financial industry that plays by the rules. And among the greatest victims of your megabanks have been the thousands of community banks that are the backbone of our economy. These banks provide the financing for the American Dream of homes, businesses, educations, and secure retirements. Yet they’re forced to compete on an un-level playing field—one where they bear the brunt of declining credit and wages—and where megabanks are rewarded with subsidies and bailouts.

So here’s the bad news—for you: As President, I have no plans to let up on you. I’ll work tirelessly to eliminate the unique danger posed by the handful of too-big-to-fail banks. And while I’m doing that, I’ll finally bring real enforcement and oversight to the federal government—to agencies and departments like the Department of Justice, Security Exchange Commission, Federal Reserve, Commodities Futures Trading Commission—so that they start doing the job the American people expect them to do and stop sitting on their hands.

If you—and your megabanks—which we, the American taxpayer, saved want to begin to restore the confidence in your leadership, you need to start by saying two things: "we’re sorry" and "thank you."

Then, you have to do the right things: stop your war on financial reform, start following the law, and end your highest-risk, most dangerous activities so that your megabanks are in fact no longer too-big-to-fail
.



read: https://martinomalley.com/dear-wall-street/

related:

O’Malley to call for Wall Street reforms, breaking up big banks in latest policy initiative
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/07/09/omalley-to-call-for-wall-street-reforms-breaking-up-big-banks/

Gov. Martin O'Malley: Prevent another crash, reform Wall Street (March 19)
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/caucus/2015/03/20/prevent-another-crash-reform-wall-street/25057735/


Send Your Own Message to Wall Street! Annotate This Letter...Highlight text on site page (using Genius -sign up req.) and add your own comments.


*read Martin O'Malley's 10-page plan*: http://martinomalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/OMalley-Wall-Street-Reform.pdf
(http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251433142)
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Martin O'Malley Releases Scathing Open Letter to Wall St.: 'I Will Not Let Up On You' (Original Post) bigtree Jul 2015 OP
K&R. O'Malley plans on burying his fellow opponents in piles of good policy. n/t FSogol Jul 2015 #1
perfect, FSogol! bigtree Jul 2015 #3
isn't primary-talk great Romeo.lima333 Jul 2015 #2
I can say the same thing about BOTH Clinton and Sanders JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #6
You really can't kenfrequed Jul 2015 #27
Oh yes I can - JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #28
Well... kenfrequed Jul 2015 #30
Very strong BeyondGeography Jul 2015 #4
I agree, BeyondGeography bigtree Jul 2015 #5
I like what I'm hearing from MOM. I'd like to hear more from him, though I am a diehard Bernie supporter. InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #9
C'mon over here, InAbLu, elleng Jul 2015 #38
He's dead on with this! JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #7
'dead on,' JustAnotherGen! bigtree Jul 2015 #8
As an aside - he's so detailed about his vision JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #10
that's an ingenious suggestion, JustAnotherGen bigtree Jul 2015 #15
K and r dembotoz Jul 2015 #11
O'Malley and Sanders are hard for me to distinguish. But I support Bernie 100% and O'Malley 99%. Feeling the Bern Jul 2015 #12
the support is welcome! bigtree Jul 2015 #16
I think it's about going after the RIGHT banksters JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #18
Exactly. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, but. . . Feeling the Bern Jul 2015 #21
Good point. The boutique VCs gamble, but hifiguy Jul 2015 #23
I don't if 'we the people' can break them up JustAnotherGen Jul 2015 #29
I agree with this. Sanders 1, O'Malley 1a. I don't like O'Malley on drug policy, but Bernie Ed Suspicious Jul 2015 #50
Sanders/O'Malley and I would bust a nut in the voting booth Feeling the Bern Jul 2015 #66
O'M message resonates with me and I think will resonate with many. Darb Jul 2015 #13
good point, darb! bigtree Jul 2015 #17
"your megabanks" < I actually think that's backwards, but YEAH!!. K&R! n.t. jtuck004 Jul 2015 #14
Wasn't he addressing Wall St with that comment? FSogol Jul 2015 #19
Yeah. But those banks own - politicians, people's lives, murder when it is profitable... jtuck004 Jul 2015 #51
so glad to see this rurallib Jul 2015 #20
definitely doubling down bigtree Jul 2015 #22
He's going to make a great vice president americanrabbit Jul 2015 #24
K&R Nobody defending Wall St is defending capitalism. raouldukelives Jul 2015 #25
. bigtree Jul 2015 #31
That's the first thing I've disagreed with. Capitalism is not fair. You can be born libdem4life Jul 2015 #39
Successful capitalism demands REGULATION, elleng Jul 2015 #43
Yes. Any social realm needs some kind of regulation otherwise people/ultimately humanity libdem4life Jul 2015 #47
KnR chknltl Jul 2015 #26
O'Malley? the negative ad guy? fbc Jul 2015 #32
O'Malley may shock the world. Octafish Jul 2015 #33
that's very generous, Octafish bigtree Jul 2015 #34
"I know that many of you have tried to dismiss and undermine my calls elleng Jul 2015 #35
Absolutely. See my post above. libdem4life Jul 2015 #40
Got it. elleng Jul 2015 #45
And of course he is correct. Sheepshank Jul 2015 #36
KnR Sheepshank Jul 2015 #37
He's singing my song d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #41
Good. Start your due diligence here, d_legendary1. elleng Jul 2015 #44
Thanks! Bookmarked it for later! d_legendary1 Jul 2015 #46
Good! I'll meet you over there!!! elleng Jul 2015 #49
I'm really beginning to like this guy. red dog 1 Jul 2015 #42
a good letter, has O'Malley had any successes vs 'mega banks' during his political career? Sunlei Jul 2015 #48
as Governor O’Malley cracked down on payday lenders bigtree Jul 2015 #52
Great info, bigtree! elleng Jul 2015 #54
Has he said he would make the same changes to the other 49 states? And, What are the names of the 4 Sunlei Jul 2015 #56
you should read the proposal bigtree Jul 2015 #58
Thank you, I think we consumers are stuck with those big banks and their fees. Sunlei Jul 2015 #63
JustAnotherGen mentioned the Post Office in her post bigtree Jul 2015 #67
Thanks for link. yes, I remember Mrs. Warren, along with O, mention post office banks along Sunlei Jul 2015 #70
If only President Obama felt this way. What we got was... Hotler Jul 2015 #53
Yes we CAN! elleng Jul 2015 #55
Totally consistent with everything O'Malley has said before. Koinos Jul 2015 #57
Great analysis again, Koinos. elleng Jul 2015 #59
Absolutely a great interview! Koinos Jul 2015 #60
Absolutely, no punches on ANYTHING. elleng Jul 2015 #61
Very nice rpannier Jul 2015 #62
Sorry, but I can't trust him on this. Just three years ago he was the hedge funders boy .... Scuba Jul 2015 #64
that article doesn't have one bit of evidence bigtree Jul 2015 #69
Betcha I can guess who won't be invited to speak at Goldman Sachs anytime soon. nt Buns_of_Fire Jul 2015 #65
I'm liking reading this madokie Jul 2015 #68
Kick! nt Andy823 Jul 2015 #71
like minds! bigtree Jul 2015 #72

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
27. You really can't
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jul 2015

Bernie has a history of going after the banks time and time again.

I won't speak about Hillary on this score.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
28. Oh yes I can -
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:39 AM
Jul 2015

I'm not fan of Clinton. She's said lots of things (Do an advanced search of LiberalStalwarts posts) where she sure had a lot of fun making race based attacks on Obama in 08 - but now . . .

She's going out to Jennifer Meyer Maguire's house in Brentwood CA to give lots of pretty speechs at $2700 a head cocktail and canapé parties.

It's just a different load of bullshit.

We Need Smith and No Labels. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
30. Well...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:10 AM
Jul 2015

I was speaking more about Bernie's record with the banks which is fairly solid.

I wasn't directly talking about Hillary. I really am not a fan of Hillary either and I have serious questions about a candidate cashing Wallstreet checks on Tuesday being able to go after them on Thursday.

As to whether or not Hillary went after Obama in some kind of racial way back in '08 I think I might not have noticed it. I am not saying it didn't happen, I just wasn't aware of it. I was spending a bit of time groaning and rolling my eyes while supporting Kucinich.

I don't know about the Brentwood crowd. I always took them to be more Hollywood than anything else. But we are dealing with the wealthy there too.

I think we probably agree on a lot more than we disagree.

BeyondGeography

(39,374 posts)
4. Very strong
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:06 AM
Jul 2015

The combination of O'Malley and Sanders should lead to some very interesting debates for the frontrunner. And when people see there isn't much substantive policy daylight between the two to the left of O'Malley, he will gain.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
7. He's dead on with this!
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:22 AM
Jul 2015
True capitalism requires a level playing field on which everyone plays by the same set of rules. True capitalism requires competition. True capitalism means that just as businesses and banks can succeed—they can also fail.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
10. As an aside - he's so detailed about his vision
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:46 AM
Jul 2015

One thing I can wait on - wait for him to be in office because there's no time during this Administration - and President Obama has done a lot for us . . .


Re Competition - I'd like to see the Post Office being used as bank for small banking customers. I'd also like to see it be a place for currency exchange (tends to be 90-100% traveling abroad).

I think Glass Steagall is a good start.

But shutting down predatory payday loaners once and for all - would be a good thing. You don't have to shut them down - you just have to give people who work for every single penny - and NEED every single penny an alternative. When they see that maybe there's a $2 administrative fee at the Post Office - they'll start going there.

From the biggest of the big on down - there is a need for extreme oversight and alternatives for consumers.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
15. that's an ingenious suggestion, JustAnotherGen
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:11 AM
Jul 2015

...well thought out and extremely compelling!

Thanks for sharing that!

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
12. O'Malley and Sanders are hard for me to distinguish. But I support Bernie 100% and O'Malley 99%.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:01 AM
Jul 2015

Go after the banksters. Populism works, people!

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
18. I think it's about going after the RIGHT banksters
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:36 AM
Jul 2015
Most of our financial system works quite well. Of the almost 6,500 banks in our country, most of which work hard every day to serve their communities, just 29 have more than $100 billion in assets and only four have more than $1 trillion in assets. The high-risk, reckless, and illegal activities of your megabanks were the primary cause of the 2008 crash, which caused the worst recession since The Great Depression, and cost the American economy an estimated $14 trillion to $22 trillion.


He wants to leave your Credit Union alone.
He wants to leave your local regional bank alone.
He wants to leave the boutique venture capitalists alone (critical for funding to minorities and women passion projects).

He wants to go after the RIGHT ones who put every other functional type in the financial ecosystems at risk - as well as the individual tax payer.

CU's, regional banks, boutique v.c.'s - they want to serve their customers and find ways for the small business entrepreneur to get where they are going.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
21. Exactly. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, but. . .
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:45 AM
Jul 2015

Bankers rate lower in my eyes than drug dealers and pimps.

As Woody Guthrie said:

"Yes, as through this world I've wandered
I've seen lots of funny men;
Some will rob you with a six-gun,
And some with a fountain pen.

And as through your life you travel,
Yes, as through your life you roam,
You won't never see an outlaw
Drive a family from their home."

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
23. Good point. The boutique VCs gamble, but
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:23 AM
Jul 2015

with THEIR OWN MONEY and not with federally guaranteed assets. No problems with them. The top dozen-plus financial giants have to be broken up and/or cut off at the knees.

I like everything O'Malley is saying.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
29. I don't if 'we the people' can break them up
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jul 2015

But I do know - that after the reimplementation of Glass Steagall we need to be able to hold individual employees responsible when the wrong thing is done.

Caveat - I have 5 things in my Wheelhouse at work if you will - and one is import/export control.

If I allow a functional group to issue us funds to a BIS list entity or individual - ie they get my approval - everyone on that email chain is going to be prosecuted, fined, and at minimum put under house arrest for 6 months.

If allow our white glove service to ship a warranty or insurance device to an address on the OFAC list in Spain (High place for us citizens to travel abroad) - I'm going to jail.


My point -there is individual accountability TODAY for employees of companies that import/export everything from wireless antenna base stations to ball point pens.

We need that. We need people to know that if you willingly engage in that activity you are personally going to have the gates of legal hell rained down upon you.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
50. I agree with this. Sanders 1, O'Malley 1a. I don't like O'Malley on drug policy, but Bernie
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jul 2015

doesn't light my world on fire there either. Bernie has a long long track record, O'Malley's track record is far less well known to me. In almost every other measure besides drug policy, I am where Bernie is. O'Malley is not far off. Both are miles better than the front runner in my view.

I would be happy to package them up as President and Veep. Order is not completely important.

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
13. O'M message resonates with me and I think will resonate with many.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:01 AM
Jul 2015

He makes a good case without putting a big red target on his back.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
17. good point, darb!
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:27 AM
Jul 2015

...very policy-oriented criticisms from my former governor.

I think it will resonate, as well!

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
51. Yeah. But those banks own - politicians, people's lives, murder when it is profitable...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 07:45 PM
Jul 2015

They aren't owned.

That would be like owning Ebola, or a serial killer.

rurallib

(62,423 posts)
20. so glad to see this
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:41 AM
Jul 2015

was actually just talking to an O'Malley staffer about this yesterday. This is a major concern of mine.

I know he has come out on Wall Street before, but I believe this is his strongest message yet. Liking him a lot.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
22. definitely doubling down
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:15 AM
Jul 2015

...on his earlier offensive against big banks and their Wall St. cohorts.

Even at the level of this latest offensive, I don't think we've seen his top on this.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
25. K&R Nobody defending Wall St is defending capitalism.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:30 AM
Jul 2015

They are defending socialism for "corporate people" over people. They are defending ignorance of reality & science, they are defending whitewashing our history and destroying education, they are defending wars for profit and the militarization of our police forces, they are defending, with every dollar, the right of more for them, today, at the cost democracy, at the cost of everything, for everyone, forever.

There is no tragedy too extreme, no violence too unacceptable, no future too bleak, to dissuade the greedy from investing in, assisting in and enjoying the fruits of hell on earth.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
39. That's the first thing I've disagreed with. Capitalism is not fair. You can be born
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 01:33 PM
Jul 2015

with it, you can be blessed with superior intelligence to earn it, you can find the fire in the belly to demand it, but that leaves the rest to work for them. There must be worker bees. How they are organized and treated and paid, aka the Middle Class, which has been an intresting social experiment, depends on the benevolent nature of the Monied Class and government supervision/regulation/oversight.

That's what has been changing. Capitalism evolves into Oligarchy and then Tyranny, unless another social experiment intervenes. That's where we are now. Pray for Bernie, because I believe he's our last chance to literally ""go backwards" and reinvigorate the middle class with union benefits, sick days, Medicare for all, minimum wage...socialist things like that from the New Deal...and they are socialist. Just like libraries, fire services, police services, K-12 education, insurance et all. All are Socialism.

Not just the Social Democratic European format...right here in the good ol' USA.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
47. Yes. Any social realm needs some kind of regulation otherwise people/ultimately humanity
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 03:37 PM
Jul 2015

will reach its human depravity. Cars can go 150 mph, but safety laws say only 70, give or take. Politicaly, Aristocracy or Dictatorship is "natural" the fortunate few ruling/pillaging/killing/ et al everything else until serfdom results.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. O'Malley may shock the world.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:49 AM
Jul 2015

Guy's got heart and brains and puts them to work for ALL, a real Democrat, in other words.

elleng

(130,974 posts)
35. "I know that many of you have tried to dismiss and undermine my calls
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 12:39 PM
Jul 2015

for stronger reforms as 'anti-capitalist.' Let me be clear- the ongoing reckless behavior of your megabanks isn’t capitalism—it’s the antithesis of it."

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
41. He's singing my song
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jul 2015

I'm gonna do my due dilligence and seek out who this guy is. I'm still hopeful for a Sanders-Warren ticket but this guy is sounding good too.

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
52. as Governor O’Malley cracked down on payday lenders
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:13 PM
Jul 2015

...first, by ending a practice that allowed payday lenders to bypass Maryland’s interest rate cap on short-term loans. The bill prevented credit service companies from charging a fee for arranging short-term loans to consumers if the fee, when combined with the interest rate, would exceed the state’s 33 percent interest rate for loans under $6,000. Lenders were charging over 600 percent annual interest, far in excess of Maryland’s legal limit of 33 percent. He also cracked down on payday lenders’ attempt to act as “credit repair” agencies. State regulators had already shut down storefront payday loan centers.


In 2007 Governor O’Malley created the Homeownership Preservation Task Force to fight foreclosures with legal and regulatory reforms and legal assistance networks helping qualified borrowers get relief through a loan modification and provide an independent party to help both sides come to a resolution.

“For homeowners who continue to be proactive, work in good faith and stay in touch with their lenders, this program is a valuable tool as they try to resolve their situation. This legislation will help keep more Marylanders in the homes they worked hard to purchase,” said Governor Martin O’Malley. “These new protections empower our fellow Marylanders, putting them on a more equal footing with mortgage companies that too often can’t be bothered to pick up the phone before beginning a foreclosure proceeding against a Maryland family. If a mortgage giant can pick up the phone to put a family into a home, they should be expected to pick up the phone before they throw a Maryland family out of a home.”


Maryland became the second state after California to institute emergency regulations requiring loan servicers to provide detailed data to the state government about homeowners with adjustable rate mortgages that are about to reset to higher interest rates. This allows the state to identify residents facing default and foreclosure and help them avoid losing their homes.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
56. Has he said he would make the same changes to the other 49 states? And, What are the names of the 4
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 10:54 PM
Jul 2015

'mega banks' he mentioned as the worse, 'to big to fail'?

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
58. you should read the proposal
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:46 PM
Jul 2015

The document references JPMorgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and U.S. Bancorp as the five biggest banks

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
63. Thank you, I think we consumers are stuck with those big banks and their fees.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 06:58 AM
Jul 2015

I wish more banks were allowed to open and there was some competition for our business. A couple years ago Post Office banks were mentioned.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
70. Thanks for link. yes, I remember Mrs. Warren, along with O, mention post office banks along
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 10:10 AM
Jul 2015

with all the consumer protection legislation they were advocating. About the time Mrs. Warrens consumer protectionDOTgov website opened. Haven't heard anything more about the post office bank idea.

We only hear about republicans blocking what they can of the crappy 'consumer protections' we Americans have.

I can't even pay a kid for a task by check, because Chase bank will take a $6.00 fee for the kid to cash a $30 check. The fee is even higher at all the 'we cash checks' places.

Hotler

(11,425 posts)
53. If only President Obama felt this way. What we got was...
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 09:20 PM
Jul 2015

"Now is not the time to point fingers." So much hope and yes we can.
Good for you Mr. O'Malley.

Koinos

(2,792 posts)
57. Totally consistent with everything O'Malley has said before.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:14 PM
Jul 2015

And yet, well worked out and highly detailed.

He is saying that the big banks are an affront to capitalism, that they have undermined the principle of free and fair competition, that (my own interpretation) unregulated greed is not what Adam Smith had in mind.

He is not calling for the destruction of capitalism; he is calling for the reform of capitalism.

He is saying that not all banks are evil, and he is implying that not all corporations are evil.

Regional and community banks are good. Big banks which regard themselves as "above the law" are bad.

What I like about O'Malley is that he is thoughtful himself and gives us lots to think about.

His ten-page plan is thorough and well thought out.

His direct attack on the big banks is courageous. O'Malley pissed them off early on:

Martin O’Malley has reportedly become Wall Street’s ‘public enemy number one’

Fox Business Network correspondent Charles Gasparino claims a lot of his sources have been talking about Martin O’Malley since the former Maryland governor launched his White House bid on Saturday. And Gasparino says Wall Street is angry with the Democratic presidential candidate.

“Martin O’Malley is now like, I would say persona non grata — public enemy number one in in the halls of Goldman Sachs, in the halls of Black Rock, the big money management firm. All throughout Wall Street right now,” Gasparino said in an appearance on Fox Business on Tuesday.


http://investmentwatchblog.com/need-to-know-omalley-becomes-wall-streets-public-enemy-no-1-bill-to-give-secret-address-to-health-insurers-hillary-in-trouble-and-why-she-cant-run-on-her-state-department-record/

Koinos

(2,792 posts)
60. Absolutely a great interview!
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 12:31 AM
Jul 2015

He came on strong and pulled no punches with the big banks and Wall Street!

elleng

(130,974 posts)
61. Absolutely, no punches on ANYTHING.
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 12:34 AM
Jul 2015

Hayes said he wants to interview him again, re: criminal stuff. I look forward to that, to lay a foundation on that issue and other urban matters.

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
62. Very nice
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 04:25 AM
Jul 2015

Lot of good points and ideas
I was skeptical but am becoming more impressed
I noted in an earlier thread about O' Malley, 'I think as more people start to get interested, I think O' Malley's numbers will pick up.'
I think he'll be a player come next winter and spring.
It'll be interesting to see how it all transpires
If he gets the nomination, I'd vote for him with little hesitation

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
69. that article doesn't have one bit of evidence
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 09:58 AM
Jul 2015

...that he was a 'hedge funders boy.'

That post was desperate political tripe.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
68. I'm liking reading this
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 09:58 AM
Jul 2015

two things is right, "We're Sorry and Thank You" would go a long way. Providing its from the heart and not just lip service. the way to know the difference is how they act after they say that.

Bernie is my main man, Martin is a close second. Just so's you know

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Martin O'Malley Releases ...