Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,749 posts)
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 09:31 PM Jun 2012

"Billionaires buy Wisconsin recall election for Scott Walker" By David Horsey at LA Times

Billionaires buy Wisconsin recall election for Scott Walker

By David Horsey at LA Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-billionaires-buy-wisconsin-20120606,0,7775507.story

"SNIP.............................................

The governor put together a nationwide fundraising effort and was richly rewarded. Two-thirds of the $31 million Walker raised to fight the recall came from out-of-state donors, mostly rich guys who hate unions. The gush of cash going to Walker overwhelmed Barrett’s boots-on-the-ground effort and provided more proof, if any more were needed, that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling -- eliminating limits on campaign donations -- has dramatically altered the balance of power in American politics.

The Citizens United decision does not apply to big corporations alone; it also frees unions to give as much as they want. But the fact is unions do not have ready access to money on the scale of the billionaire boys club. When just one man, casino king Sheldon Adelson, can write a couple of checks and fund Newt Gingrich’s entire presidential campaign, you know the craps table of electioneering has been tilted in favor of candidates who look after the concerns of the mega-rich.

And guess what? Most of those candidates, just like most billionaires, are Republicans.

Occupy Wall Street enthusiasts can camp out on the sidewalk and conduct their exquisitely egalitarian group discussions. Anarchists can gleefully smash windows at Bank of America and Starbucks. Union members can set up phone banks and carry picket signs. But as long as elections are there to be bought, a handful of billionaires will have a far louder voice in who runs the country than all the activists on the left combined.

................................................SNIP"
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Billionaires buy Wisconsin recall election for Scott Walker" By David Horsey at LA Times (Original Post) applegrove Jun 2012 OP
Pretty clear analysis there. Thanks, Applegrove. freshwest Jun 2012 #1
people still Bellerophon Jun 2012 #2
Who are you voting for in November Bellerophon? Obama or Romney? shcrane71 Jun 2012 #4
i am undecided Bellerophon Jun 2012 #5
Oh boy... So you're just fine with Walker's campaign robo-calling recall petition signers shcrane71 Jun 2012 #6
i never said Bellerophon Jun 2012 #7
So how much money you have has nothing to do with being able to get a message out? shcrane71 Jun 2012 #8
in Bellerophon Jun 2012 #10
You know as well as I do that talk show won't take Democratic callers and candidates. shcrane71 Jun 2012 #11
that`s why a democrat was elected to the senate madrchsod Jun 2012 #3
Citizens United did not "eliminate limits on campaign donations". Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #9
 

Bellerophon

(50 posts)
2. people still
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 11:10 PM
Jun 2012

Need to vote for somebody to win so I call bs. Obama out spent Mccain but that election wasn't bought...

Just saying...

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
6. Oh boy... So you're just fine with Walker's campaign robo-calling recall petition signers
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 11:48 AM
Jun 2012

and telling them not to vote. You're fine with Republicans running fake candidates in Democratic races. You're fine with oil tycoons like the Koch brothers buying elections. You just don't like it when "union thugs" like teachers and firefighters make campaign contributions to Democrats, right?

 

Bellerophon

(50 posts)
7. i never said
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jun 2012

Any of that. You asked who I would vote for in November and I answered. I never indicated any support for any candidate. I just don't think than money translates to votes. I never vote based on how much a particular candidate has...

 

Bellerophon

(50 posts)
10. in
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 02:27 PM
Jun 2012

WI both sides had plenty to get the message out. Advertising is only one part of it. There are man other ways to do it like grass roots and going on talk shows.

It is self defeating to attempt to blame a loss due to funding...

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
3. that`s why a democrat was elected to the senate
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 11:22 PM
Jun 2012

that democratic victory threw a wrench into walkers machine. this election was`t black or white. there were several shades of grey that must writers are to lazy to understand.

although walker won he does`t have the senate and far worse is the fact that more people around him are taking immunity and others are going to jail. the feds and the state are not spending time and money on nothing.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
9. Citizens United did not "eliminate limits on campaign donations".
Fri Jun 8, 2012, 01:49 PM
Jun 2012

The case did not affect the federal ban on contributions from corporations or unions to candidate campaigns or political parties in federal elections.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Billionaires buy Wi...