Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:49 AM Jul 2015

When The Media Play By ‘Clinton Rules’

Having coined the phrase “Clinton Rules” to explain the national news media’s obsession with phony scandal narratives involving Bill and Hillary Clinton, I should be gratified to see it pass into general circulation.

First came New York Times columnist and liberal MVP Paul Krugman, casting doubt upon that newspaper’s virtually incomprehensible 4,400-word treatise, which insinuated that Secretary of State Clinton had peddled a Wyoming uranium mine to the Russians in return for contributions to her family’s charitable foundation:

“If you are old enough to remember the 1990s,” Krugman wrote, “you remember the endless parade of alleged scandals, Whitewater above all—all of them fomented by right-wing operatives, all eagerly hyped by mainstream news outlets, none of which actually turned out to involve wrongdoing. The usual rules didn’t seem to apply; instead it was Clinton rules, under which innuendo and guilt by association were considered perfectly OK, in which the initial suggestion of lawbreaking received front-page headlines and the subsequent discovery that there was nothing there was buried in the back pages if it was reported at all.”

To some degree, hard feelings are inevitable in politics. The Times has recently documented how successful conservative groups such as Karl Rove’s American Crossroads are at planting anti-Clinton messages among Democrats. That Hillary hater on Facebook may be a professional troll. They’re also spending big bucks on focus groups, studying how to make the party’s likeliest nominee look like a gold-plated bitch come November 2016.



http://www.nationalmemo.com/when-the-media-play-by-clinton-rules/


24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When The Media Play By ‘Clinton Rules’ (Original Post) sufrommich Jul 2015 OP
Sounds like another strong reason to have a better Democratic nominee than Clinton. 99Forever Jul 2015 #1
That's not "picking a better nominee". That's capitulating to rumormongering. DetlefK Jul 2015 #3
Some people are cool with that "the enemy of my enemy" crap.nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #4
And others have their heads buried in the sand. 99Forever Jul 2015 #6
No it isn't. 99Forever Jul 2015 #5
There's a reason that the GOP is spending time and money sufrommich Jul 2015 #7
I don't care what Republicans think. 99Forever Jul 2015 #8
I don't think exposing republican dirty tricks is "playing sufrommich Jul 2015 #9
Oh please. 99Forever Jul 2015 #10
I'm not trying to "fool" anyone.nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #12
Yeah. Right. 99Forever Jul 2015 #14
Think about it then - Republicans are gearing up massive of dollars to campaign against Clinton London Lover Man Jul 2015 #19
Don't be naïve... Adrahil Jul 2015 #17
He already has been from the Clinton Surrogates. 99Forever Jul 2015 #18
He's seen nothing like what they will Adrahil Jul 2015 #23
So you are ok with the media mcar Jul 2015 #20
What does it matter whether I'm "okay" with it or not? 99Forever Jul 2015 #22
No. It doesn't clear it up mcar Jul 2015 #24
"That Hillary hater on Facebook may be a professional troll." DanTex Jul 2015 #2
"Clinton Rules" name not needed Jul 2015 #11
Yeah,the GOP made a mountain out of that molehill too. nt sufrommich Jul 2015 #13
I understand why they did that DVRacer Jul 2015 #15
I don't think we'll ever see that again during this campaign. On the surface it looks ugly but... George II Jul 2015 #16
This cannot be kicked and rec'ed mcar Jul 2015 #21

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
1. Sounds like another strong reason to have a better Democratic nominee than Clinton.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:59 AM
Jul 2015

Thanks for giving me one more reason to support Senator Sanders.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
5. No it isn't.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:32 AM
Jul 2015

A President that spends all of their time and energy defending their questionable history has no time or energy to take care of We the People's business.

Capitulating is what neoliberals do when they kiss Wall Street and the Republicans asses. We've had far too much of that already and Hillary is just more of the same.

But thanks for playing.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
7. There's a reason that the GOP is spending time and money
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:41 AM
Jul 2015

trying to bring down Clinton and staying mum about other democratic candidates.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
8. I don't care what Republicans think.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:47 AM
Jul 2015

Only triangulaters need to play that crap.

So, which is it? Hillary is a strong strong strong woman? Or Hilary is a poor poor poor victim?

You folks can't seem to make up your mind.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
9. I don't think exposing republican dirty tricks is "playing
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:55 AM
Jul 2015

the victim". Funny how we don't accuse other democratic politicians who have been subject to dirty tricks campaigns by the GOP of whining about being victims.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
19. Think about it then - Republicans are gearing up massive of dollars to campaign against Clinton
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:56 PM
Jul 2015

but what if Bernie is the nominee - they absolutely have no attacks against bernie, and no defense against Bernie's point-of-matters.

They'll wind up spending the campaign dollars trying to out-Bernie Bernie Sanders, and failing miserably, ending CU's short lived career after Bernie puts together a constitutional amendment removing CU as the law of the land, and begin 100% public funding of election - not even corporatists are allowed to contribute.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
17. Don't be naïve...
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jul 2015

If Bernie were to become the front runner, he would become the target of the phony scandal mongers. And don't kid yourself into believing he's immune to it. No one is. They make shit up.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
18. He already has been from the Clinton Surrogates.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:55 PM
Jul 2015

Handled 'em just fine. In fact, showed them for the freakin' fools they are. Trashed them without lowering himself to their level. Been doing it to Teapublicans for many years.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. He's seen nothing like what they will
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:39 PM
Jul 2015

hurl.

Clinton is dealing with it up front, because she is seen as most likely to win. What Bernie has faced so far doesn't even count as scandal mongering.

mcar

(42,357 posts)
20. So you are ok with the media
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:03 PM
Jul 2015

Chasing non scandals and made up crap about a candidate?

To What "questionable history" are you referring?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
22. What does it matter whether I'm "okay" with it or not?
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:37 PM
Jul 2015

Not that I said I was. I'm not, but just precisely what the fuck is it you propose I do to stop them?

Questionable history. You, the facts of what someone has done that you would rather not be out in public. The stuff that makes people call "haters" for observing. That questionable history.

That clear up your confusion?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
2. "That Hillary hater on Facebook may be a professional troll."
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:08 AM
Jul 2015

Indeed. Particularly the ones that claim to be progressive but somehow have quickly fallen in love with right-wing smears.

DVRacer

(707 posts)
15. I understand why they did that
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:16 AM
Jul 2015

And you understand why they did that, but the average voter will not take the time to understand. That to me that is HRC's campaigns biggest problem the optics look bad at every turn. From roping off the media to the whole email blunder to the average voter it just doesn't look good. I get the explanations but when you have to stop and explain everything it piles up in voters minds that you are hiding something. People are hungry for open and honest they are tired of opaque and fuzzy images of the truth and if it is fuzzy you can damn we'll be assured it will be twisted into something it's not.

George II

(67,782 posts)
16. I don't think we'll ever see that again during this campaign. On the surface it looks ugly but...
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:42 PM
Jul 2015

...we have to remember that along with being a candidate this and next year, she's also an ex-First Lady, probably requiring more security than other candidates at this point. I'd bet that by next year this will be forgotten by everyone but Karl Rove and Sean Hannity.

And once we get to later this year or early next year, all the remaining candidates will have increased security.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When The Media Play By ‘C...