Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:15 AM Jul 2015

One question I'd like to see all Dem candidates answer:

What are you going to do about GOP obstruction?


Hillary, Bernie, O'Malley have all rolled out strong progressive platforms. If any of them gets all or even half of what they are proposing through congress, it will be great.

But we all know what the GOP is like in congress. From day one they will make it their mission to make sure nothing good gets accomplished. And it's highly likely that they keep the house at least. Which means a lot of gridlock.

I'd like to hear candidates give realistic answers as to how they plan to fight against the GOP while in office, in order to get things accomplished despite all the obstructionism. Because the limiting factor for any of these three is not what they want to get done. It's what they will actually be able to get done.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
2. There's no answer in that form letter. 'I will not negotiate' is not a plan.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:31 AM
Jul 2015

It's politician-speak. Nothing more.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. That's the status quo and not even that is contained in that form letter.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:46 AM
Jul 2015

No plan.

That's a letter about the TPP which has the primary purpose of skimming contact information to solicit donations.

Oh, and also so you can be connected to a Congressperson's office so that you can, ironically, negotiate with them.

No plan.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
5. Thanks. And that's a pretty good answer, given the style of campaign he's running.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:47 AM
Jul 2015

As with many things Bernie, it sounds great but strikes me as a tad unrealistic. On the other hand, if he does manage to win the GE, he will necessarily have brought about a pretty massive change in the political outlook and engagement of the electorate, which could in turn change the Washington obstruction game as well.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
6. Hillar's also answered the question in a broad way
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:04 AM
Jul 2015

and it is consistent with the strategy that the Clinton's have always used.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
8. Yup. We know for instance that she would seek "common ground" with GOP on abortion rights.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 11:59 AM
Jul 2015

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/rupert-murdoch-loves-hillary-clinton/

If she is willing to compromise away women's rights on health, I can't imagine her putting up much of a fight for anything else.



raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
7. Heck yes. I'd love to hear all Democrats answer that one.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 11:25 AM
Jul 2015

Are you going to increase the funds of corporate lobbyists, of the GOP and the other political obstructionists to a cleaner, safer, saner world or lessen it?

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
9. Funny you should ask.......
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 12:29 PM
Jul 2015

"ANNAPOLIS, Md. — As the Maryland Senate debated a crackdown on guns last week, one Republican after another objected that amendments were being smothered by the Democratic majority in its haste to send Gov. Martin O’Malley the bill he wanted.

But the opponents had no chance, as allies of the governor passed sweeping gun restrictions, the final victory in a series of triumphs that capped one of the most successful 2013 legislative seasons of any governor in the country.

Besides gun control legislation, Mr. O’Malley coaxed a liberal wish list from the General Assembly session that ended Monday: repeal of the death penalty, a $1.7 billion subsidy for offshore wind turbines and a bump in the gasoline tax to pay for mass transit and roads.

Republicans fumed that Mr. O’Malley had steered well to the left of Maryland residents’ concerns, and denounced his agenda as a punch list for a 2016 Democratic presidential primary campaign. Mr. O’Malley — largely unknown outside Maryland, though he is mentioned in presidential speculations alongside Govs. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York and John W. Hickenlooper of Colorado — said the bills were smart policy and in step with state residents."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/us/omalley-steers-maryland-to-the-left.html?_r=0


DanTex

(20,709 posts)
12. LOL. I don't know what I would do about it. That's part of why I'm asking.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 12:58 PM
Jul 2015

Maybe it is like the FLATUS. Nothing can be done. But if that's true, it doesn't matter so much all the policy details that candidates are for, because in the end it's just going to be inching forward against obstructionism no matter who is in the white house.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
13. Seems that way sometimes
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 01:04 PM
Jul 2015

Personally I prefer a candidate who will fight even if the fight seems futile.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»One question I'd like to ...