Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama vs Clinton in 2008 (Original Post) Damansarajaya Jul 2015 OP
Yes, if Sanders was a once-in-a-generation politician, with fundraising capacity that rivals DanTex Jul 2015 #1
well said. Sanders does not equal Obama wyldwolf Jul 2015 #2
I'm waiting to see the first time any poll of any tiny demographic shows Bernie ahead. DanTex Jul 2015 #3
Obama had big money donors, Bernie has refused that money, and oddly enough sabrina 1 Jul 2015 #39
The only thing Bernie has refused is SuperPAC money, which didn't exist in 2008. DanTex Jul 2015 #44
Sanders is superior Buzz cook Jul 2015 #5
What a pant load LordGlenconner Jul 2015 #6
well spoken you argue with great skill Buzz cook Jul 2015 #16
I cannot belive you actually typed those words! Walk away Jul 2015 #28
so you want to rely on the media for Sanders to win? wyldwolf Jul 2015 #7
I think the only reason Obama won Buzz cook Jul 2015 #17
Then your analytical skills are weak. Adrahil Jul 2015 #38
BULLSHIT!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2015 #8
Well said Buzz cook Jul 2015 #19
You are correct. Sanders is even better than Obama by far. London Lover Man Jul 2015 #11
bookmarking for fun later. wyldwolf Jul 2015 #12
It'll Buzz cook Jul 2015 #22
I don't expect Sanders to win and Buzz cook Jul 2015 #20
Uh-huh. And a friendly wager to each other's campaign coffers? Say $25? London Lover Man Jul 2015 #21
I see you've turned you coat. Buzz cook Jul 2015 #23
Well, considering that I have seen Obama offer Chained CPI to endanger Social Security London Lover Man Jul 2015 #43
And yet Buzz cook Jul 2015 #46
Who does? fadedrose Jul 2015 #14
You're right. Sanders would never sell us out to the highest bidding corporation. Fearless Jul 2015 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author London Lover Man Jul 2015 #42
Was PBO losing African Americans to HRC 36-1 DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #4
No, but Clinton's supporters were saying Obama was only ahead because he was black. Scootaloo Jul 2015 #27
So, this begs the question, why do black voters support Hillary 36-1?[n/t] Maedhros Jul 2015 #29
she reaches out to them in different ways to get their support JI7 Jul 2015 #31
My guess is simply a lack of exposure for Sanders Scootaloo Jul 2015 #33
In that context, the polls really mean little. Maedhros Jul 2015 #35
One only needs to read the African American posters here on DU Scootaloo Jul 2015 #36
As they should! Maedhros Jul 2015 #37
Sanders is at 17 percent 18 months out. Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #9
But Hillary wasn't at 57, was she? DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #13
Edwards and Biden also aren't running in 2016 Scootaloo Jul 2015 #34
Many are telling me that Clinton's numbers are higher than it was in 2008 London Lover Man Jul 2015 #10
Yup. No one ever started with a bigger head start than Hillary . . . Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #15
I'm not sure Sanders ever had a bill passed in Senate. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #18
The difference is that he's been pounding away on Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #24
Yet most Americans have never heard of him. Can you say INEFFECTIVE? Metric System Jul 2015 #26
Well, his spouse didn't have an extra-martial affair while she was Damansarajaya Jul 2015 #45
Name recognition + Beltway media privilege + public relations machine = poll numbers.[n/t] Maedhros Jul 2015 #30
I was afraid no was going to jump in and challenge her. nt artislife Jul 2015 #32
that actually isn't true dsc Jul 2015 #40
Obama was neck and neck with her throughout in the money race though. MohRokTah Jul 2015 #25

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
1. Yes, if Sanders was a once-in-a-generation politician, with fundraising capacity that rivals
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 02:41 PM
Jul 2015

Hillary, one of the most stirring public speakers of our time, gets a lot of endorsements from leading Dems, and doesn't call himself a "socialist", then he has a chance of squeaking out a very close victory.

But probably not. Obama wasn't nearly as far behind at this point.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
3. I'm waiting to see the first time any poll of any tiny demographic shows Bernie ahead.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 02:47 PM
Jul 2015

Dems? No. Liberal dems? No. Men? No. Women? No. White? No. Black? No. Poor? No. Rich? No.

Maybe if they polled pot-smoking bearded hipsters from Vermont, it would be a statistical tie.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
39. Obama had big money donors, Bernie has refused that money, and oddly enough
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 11:33 PM
Jul 2015

Biden has echoed Bernie's call to refuse those bribes just this week. I wonder why Biden chose to do that right after the release of the figures on the donations to candidates. It felt like he was warning us. Like Bernie.

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
5. Sanders is superior
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jul 2015

To Obama in every detail, except for not being the designated anti-Clinton. If the media start supporting Sanders in the same way they supported Obama it will be a real race.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
28. I cannot belive you actually typed those words!
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 05:16 PM
Jul 2015

I was thinking them! I always use archaic expressions that no one else uses. I could not agree with you more.

If Joe Biden jumped in the race tomorrow, Hillary would still win the primaries and Bernie would be the forgotten man.

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
17. I think the only reason Obama won
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:21 PM
Jul 2015

Was because he had support in the media and Hillary didn't I think the only way Sanders could defeat Clinton is the same way.

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
19. Well said
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:26 PM
Jul 2015

Obama said FDR purposely allowed the great depression to worsen, between the election and his inauguration, in a cynical bid to increase his own popularity. Obama said this in his own defense for selling us out to the Bush administration and the banks.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
11. You are correct. Sanders is even better than Obama by far.
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:17 PM
Jul 2015

And will poll better, and it won't be much of a horse race after the debates. I also expect to see your avatar change at some point in the fall/winter.

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
22. It'll
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:31 PM
Jul 2015

Only be fun if a democrat wins and only then if Obama hasn't poisoned the well before he leaves office.

Who know he may still get his grand bargain.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
21. Uh-huh. And a friendly wager to each other's campaign coffers? Say $25?
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:31 PM
Jul 2015

to the winner of the August debates....

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
23. I see you've turned you coat.
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:45 PM
Jul 2015

Now you like Sanders, or is it just you like Obama more?

Pick an issue in which Obama has been to the left of Sanders and delivered on his promise. Obama and his administration were ridiculing Elizabeth Warren not Bernie Sanders.

Who decides the winner of a debate? After each Gore/Bush debate the immediate reaction was that Gore had won but just days later the consensus was that Bush was the winner. How could that be?

I know you're just trolling me, but please treat that last question seriously.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
43. Well, considering that I have seen Obama offer Chained CPI to endanger Social Security
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 11:45 PM
Jul 2015

won't let anyone see the contents of TPP, kicked out public option or even single payer supporters from the tables in regards to PPACA (HeritageCare), fail to keep any of his promises regarding the withdrawal of the military (We still have boots on the ground in both Afghanistan and Iraq), yeah, I fail to see how Obama is to the left of Sanders on anything and accomplished it. ENDA. Lily Ledbetter. I can think of more that he failed to follow up on.

Buzz cook

(2,475 posts)
46. And yet
Tue Jul 21, 2015, 12:25 AM
Jul 2015

When I sad Bernie Sanders was superior to Obama you denigrated my comment with a great deal of snark.

What was it about my comment that so incensed you?

Response to wyldwolf (Reply #2)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,719 posts)
4. Was PBO losing African Americans to HRC 36-1
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 02:48 PM
Jul 2015

Was PBO losing African Americans to HRC 36-1:



http://www.suffolk.edu/documents/SUPRC/7_15_2015_tables.pdf


PAGE 10


at any point in the campaign?



and losing Hispanics 24-1 :


http://huelladigital.univisionnoticias.com/the-latin-vote/



at any point in the campaign?



Oh, according to your own link PBO was down nine points in the Gallup Poll this time in the 08 election cycle .Sanders is down around 46:


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html





JI7

(89,303 posts)
31. she reaches out to them in different ways to get their support
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 07:25 PM
Jul 2015

she has many black people working with her and seeks endorsements from black people .

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
33. My guess is simply a lack of exposure for Sanders
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 07:32 PM
Jul 2015

Clinton's been in the public eye since 1992 (Longer, for Arkansans... Arkansasers? Er...) She's known, she's damilair, she comes readily to mind when someone talks about democrats. Sanders by comparison, is a senator from Vermont who is only really recently catching greater public notice. I think in this regard he can be best compared to John Kerry, who set out as "Senator from Massachusetts."

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
35. In that context, the polls really mean little.
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 08:06 PM
Jul 2015

I think black voters are motivated this election cycle and will look at all the candidates. Mainstream media exposure, such as debates, will give us all a good look at how the candidates compare to one another. I expect Bernie's and O'Malley's numbers across the board to go up with exposure, and Hillary's to go down, after the original name-recognition gives way to policy considerations.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
36. One only needs to read the African American posters here on DU
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 08:09 PM
Jul 2015

From what I see, most of our AA community is dedicated to being "undecided." and taking good hard looks at all three main candidates.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
34. Edwards and Biden also aren't running in 2016
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jul 2015

Gotta remember that the Democratic Primary in 2008 had plenty of candidates beyond the two who ended up spending the last four month clobbering each other.

 

London Lover Man

(371 posts)
10. Many are telling me that Clinton's numbers are higher than it was in 2008
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:15 PM
Jul 2015

But history is going to repeat itself in 2016, as it did for 2008. Does not bode very well for Clinton, especially in the downward trend since she announced, and Bernie's trend continue to rise, just like Obama did..

 

Damansarajaya

(625 posts)
15. Yup. No one ever started with a bigger head start than Hillary . . .
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 01:03 PM
Jul 2015

Either time. And no one has ever blown such a big start.

The problem is, she's not saying anything big and bold, and she has never done anything big and bold, except run for president.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
18. I'm not sure Sanders ever had a bill passed in Senate.
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 06:23 PM
Jul 2015

Possibly a lot of Amendments, but if we're talking about accomplishments...

 

Damansarajaya

(625 posts)
24. The difference is that he's been pounding away on
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 05:00 PM
Jul 2015

a single message for decades.

Hillary has been running for office for decades.

 

Damansarajaya

(625 posts)
45. Well, his spouse didn't have an extra-martial affair while she was
Mon Jul 20, 2015, 02:12 PM
Jul 2015

President of the United States, so there's that . . .

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
32. I was afraid no was going to jump in and challenge her. nt
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 07:30 PM
Jul 2015

She probably was afraid someone would....


^^^^ Yes...pure conjecture. But it amuses me. What can I say, I like to laugh.

dsc

(52,187 posts)
40. that actually isn't true
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 11:39 PM
Jul 2015

Gore lead Bradley by more in 2000, than Hillary lead Obama by in 2008. And we see how Gore did.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
25. Obama was neck and neck with her throughout in the money race though.
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 05:03 PM
Jul 2015

That's the important race.

Sanders doesn't have the money raising capability that Obama had.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Obama vs Clinton in 2008