The Washington Post/ABC News poll or the poll from the internet????? Which one should I believe??? More

Nor the 50 or 60 people who I know around town here.
Besides, it is STILL too early to take stock in these polls. The primaries are not for at least 7 months.

I prefer to follow scientific polls.

But I do agree that polling this far out doesn't mean much. It's for the political junkies.

Is that one that uses quantum mechanics to come up with whatever outcome the folks who commission wanted?
Don't people realize that they craft these questions to get whatever outcome they want? Just follow the money.

Asking 50 or 60 people you know would not constitute a random sample.

But in quantum mechanics a particle can be in all of its subatomic states at the same time. It is only the act of measuring in which the outcome is certain. You cant influence the outcome.

compared to 7 weeks or so for Bernie. Yeah thats the ticket.
Bernie has this one you watch and see. We're months away from the first ballots so lets see that the numbers are once we get a tad closer.

Hillary has had her eye on the Presidency for years, Bernie, Martin or Lincoln not so much.
My money is on Benie

Where are you getting your numbers from?

early after bill walked into the oval office. I get that number from paying attention to the last 23 years if you must know.

among Dems (and among liberal Dems even) than Hillary has amassed over her 23 years. Go figure.

seriously.

You want to take a serious approach to gun control? As a rural liberal gun owner I'm all for it! Lets institute background checks, bullet limits, training requirements, waiting periods. Whatever works. Lets ban some types of guns, make laws about when and where you can have them and offer buybacks. Lets deal with our mental health problems, culture of violence and accepted racism too. What we can't do is allow people to sue people for something that is legal under the current laws. That is an irresponsibly dangerous precedent.

He's had 30 years to grab more of the national spotlight, but he never bothered until now after others have worked to shed old stereotypes that would have prevented him from being taken seriously. Now he's swooping in for the limelight.

One fifth of Democrats say they would never vote for him.

That's a bad hole to start from

And even then, it's only 47% to 43%.

Someone posted a Nate Silver poll that showed that Sanders support is more about Sanders and -- despite the endless, incessant howls on DU -- very little about Hillary or the Dem party. Every single poll seems to bear that truth out. Hillary's approval numbers are not moving and even when Sanders' numbers go up a bit, Hillary's don't move.

That's the definition of a candidate who is pulling in voters because voters are thrilled with his message and not because he's the anti-Hillary or anti-Dem. Again, despite the endless howls of the darlings on DU.

Grand you many have been encouraging Bernie for a couple years now so you might can include those but Hillary has had her sights on the white house since Bill won.

And even if your "Hillary's been wanting to run for 23 years" was true, Bernie's still been in Congress for longer than that.

What I said made perfect sense just not what you wanted to hear is all.

And between the typos and stuff you just made up, no nothing in your post made sense.

She is Brilliant!

I bet Sanders is stomping her in that demographic.

I think I need to know that to correctly interpret the result.

according to the poll, they are few and far between.

Liberal Dems seem to like Hillary very much.

If I like the outcome it's 100% accurate
If I don't, it's 100% bullshit

or massively uninformed. Unless the term liberal has been changed to supporting wall street interests, while working with the republicans to take down the last remnants of the New Deal and Great Society social programs...like the current occupant is doing.

You might as well claim that most vegetarians actually eat meat.

I know some very very liberal people including my three children who are supporting Clinton over Sanders. I am liberal but at times my kids make me feel old and like a dinosaur

Why is the press touting the liberal Dem with the most general election vulnerabilities? Why did they ignore the Edwards campaign, calling his second place showing in Iowa a "last place"? Why Sanders and not O'Malley? Why McGovern and not Muskey?

I smell a rat. So do many other leftists.

i never thought of it that way.

You're right....the right wing isn't touching Bernie while focusing fire on Hillary.

many leftists consider the term liberal a pejorative like they do conservative.

Pure unadutrated propaganda bullshit.

.... the DNC is loathe to schedule debates, because they will only serve to highlight his superior grasp of the policy issues that matter most to ordinary Americans. Bernie is compelling because he speaks from the heart. Martin O' Malley is similarly charismatic.

Hillary will not come out well in a matchup against them so look for the Clinton Cabal to limit debates to ensure the upcoming coronation goes smoothly.