They like to sneer and condescend. I take it as a sign they are concerned about Bernie.
I'm busy getting signatures to put Bernie on the ballot. We unicorns are a powerful force!

Clinton supporters are desparate and bitter. Every revolution has it opponents clinging to the status quo. They are on the wrong side of history...that's their problem. Chins up! Here's some motivational music:
https://m.

At first the Hillary brigade were more of a pat-on-the-head "there there, you can have your little moment in the sun but we ALL know who is going to win"

Now you can see the desperation in their retorts as Bernie creeps closer, even some jumping ship and swimming over to the Bernie campaign. Because they simply cannot find any ammunition to use against him. Although they have really really tried the "Bernie doesn't care about black people" as much as Hillary. He is in agreement with Hillary on social issues. There only difference, but its a big one, seems to be voting for the status quo for Wall Street, or fundamental change.

Besides, Bernie's too far left on the issues to win the General Election!

"Statistics" and math in general need a safe haven group here. They're simply taking a beating.

He walks his talk.

He sticks to his bottom line: support the 99%.

The donations reflect this and Sanders had to start as an unknown.

And Hillary's 17% out of $48Million is about $9Million from small donors. A good haul for them both.

Specifically:

81% of 13.7 million is 11.2Million. He raised $10.2Million in small donors. Still a good haul, but only a $1M more than Hillary in small donations. My point was about correcting the articles math.

You're still talking about total dollars, because that obscures the article's point.

The article is talking about total donations, not total dollars. That doesn't tell the story you want to tell.

With Hillary claiming 260,000 donors to Bernie's 280,000. Like I said, a good haul for both.

Because again, you have a story to tell. You need Clinton to be "the candidate of the people" to sell her latest incarnation.

I support both candidates.

that do not tell the story you want to tell.

Do the math.

Because doing the math wrong let you discredit the article.

What is 81% of 13.7Million?

As for $10M versus $11.097M, I'm going to assume coverage that includes phrasing like "over ___ dollars" is not 100% precise.

What is 81% of 13.7Million? Hint: Its not 10.2Million.

So it went from a "math" fail to a "reading fail", yet I addressed all of your concerns in this thread. How about instead writing to Alternet and letting them know about their math fail.

Who fucking cares...

Btw, what is 81% of 13.7Million?

And white, too!

Anecdotal from L.A.. I'm married to a teacher and recently attended a dinner party with a bunch of teachers. Most of the teachers were female and nearly all of them were Clinton supporters....were. Now, virtually all of them are Bernie supporters. The Truth is very attractive platform to run on. especially when you have the voting record to back it up.

What about a small donation makes someone average?

Really? 81% - 17%. I file this under Who the F--k Cares!

I'm married to a union guy and recently attended a supper party with a bunch of other union folks. Most of them were male and Bernie supporters . . . were. Now, almost all of them are Hillary supporters. They just like her better and appreciate her much more positive attitude instead of being angry all the time.

See how easy that was to craft that paragraph.

I'm not sure why they think they are democrats

That's more my speed.