2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMemo to my Fellow Bernie Supporters!
First, I know you all know this, but I just like saying it because it is the truth.
We have an AMAZING candidate, someone that we can TRUST when he talks about what he will do when he wins this election.
We KNOW this because of his long, long record that proves, this is not the usual Politician telling voters what they want to hear during a campaign.
This is someone who has the BEST RECORD of ANYONE in this Campaign on:
CIVIL RIGHTS (check out his long history on this and his voting record, simply indisputable)
WALL ST CORRUPTION (see his voting record on this)
WOMEN'S RIGHTS (again, see his record on this and his voting record)
WAR (check for yourselves, I know you have already but it makes you wish we had had more of him when those votes were so critical)
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (so few stood up when the draconian Patriot Act came up for a vote, but Bernie was there again, among the few, doing the unpopular but the RIGHT thing when it was needed.
THE ENVIRONMENT (his long record on fighting for the environment is one of the best in Congress)
LABOR (need I go into detail on this issue? There's a reason why he has always had the support of Unions to keep him in office and just got the endorsement of the VT Teachers' Union)
Read his speeches and listen to them and see the consistency of his record going back throughout his entire career.
There is so much more for us to look at when choosing who we want as a leader for this country, FAR MORE than ANY OTHER CANDIDATE in this race.
So why, you may be asking, is there a single Democrat trying to derail, though failing spectacularly, his campaign?
Every other candidate in this campaign is compromised by taking Corporate Money.
Bernie has refused to be beholden to Big Money Donors and Special Interests.
THAT IS A DIRECT THREAT TO THOSE who have a vested interest in buying our candidates.
Free from the chains of corporate money, he is free to tell the truth.
You have noticed I am sure, one of the most persistent and FALSE Rovian Talking Points aimed at Bernie.
Money is spent on this kind of negative campaigning so when they think they've dome up with something, naturally they are going to keep on trying to make it stick.
But here's why Bernie and his growing number of supporters do not have to worry one bit about these feeble efforts we have been watching.
YOU CANNOT TURN THE TRUTH INTO A LIE!
The Fact is Bernie Sanders has the BEST and LONGEST Record on Civil Rights of anyone in this campaign, and no amount of repetition of the lie is going to change that.
So USE it, if corporate money is going to be spent on negative campaigning, we should take advantage of it.
SHOW those you are talking to about Bernie in order to sign them up for his campaign, examples of what his opponents are focusing on.
Let them see what passes for campaigns among corporate funded candidates. Money is corrupting our entire system and it's a big issue for voters in this campaign. So show them examples of what that money is buying.
SHOW voters 'this is what his opponents are doing', and then show them what Bernie is doing and I can tell you, it is amazing how it works to draw that contrast between him and those who spend their time NOT talking about issues, but trying to get people to believe a lie hoping that is going to help their candidate.
PEOPLE WANT TO TALK ABOUT ISSUES!
Bernie continues to soar among the people because that is what he does.
And the TRUTH cannot be turned into a LIE no matter how hard someone tries to do.
THANK YOU Bernie, for being so honest, for refusing to engage in negative campaigning, for sticking to the issues that matter to the people.
Just wanted to say how proud I am to have a candidate like this.
It is so very refreshing to have such a candidate in this race!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)at work, the more determined I am that we won't need to hold any noses to vote from now on, WE will choose the candidates we want and so far, we are doing pretty good wrt to this race!
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the candidates are. I know that some don't care. They like to be taken care of by the wealthy.
Sen Sanders does not represent the billionaires, he represents the people. That's very scary to some. "Actually let the people have control instead of the oligarchy?"
Dare to stand up against the tyranny of the oligarchy.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)in the face of lies and intimidation from bullies and liars and we are going to see plenty of that over the next year.
They have billions to spend on nasty campaign dirty tricks, we have the truth to quash the lies with.
And there are going to be millions of us, so I hope they are prepared, this will not be like other campaigns where Dems did not fight back, they are going to have a real fight on their hands against the lies, the smears, the deceptions, and I don't much care about the whining anymore.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)That's why I fear for Sen Sander's safety. That would be the easiest way to neutralize us is to compromise him in some way.
But on the other hand, this movement is bigger than Sen Sanders and would continue even if they manage to neutralize him. This is a world wide movement. Goldman-Sachs made millions on the financial disaster in Greece. The battle lines are being drawn. Sad to see those here on this supposedly "politically liberal" message board, side with the oligarchs. Sad but not surprising. These are authoritarians that need to follow a strong leader whether they are honest or not. They are willing to give up their freedoms and liberties for a "promise" of security. And I am ashamed that they call themselves Democrats.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)did for the Left. We were rolled over. The advantage we now have is that the entire climate has changed, and what they took as 'weakness' was no such thing, it was US not understanding the ruthlessness of those who have so much to lose once the people wake up.
In a way I like that they are so out of touch with the changes that have taken place, let them operate as if we were still living in the 'fifties.
A whole new generation, a very large voting bloc, has entered the equation and they are not at all happy with the 'way things are'.
And they never should have mistaken thoughtfulness with weakness, but that's not our problem that is theirs.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I think it's fair for me to say that because I am one. The BB's parents experienced the depression first hand and were skeptical of those that came along after the FDR reforms and wanted to sell pigs in pokes. But the BB grew up with the Cleaver family and experienced relative comfort. They (we) got soft and complacent. We woke up some when our government started killing us, wounding us, spraying us with cancer-causing chemicals, and giving us PTSD in Vietnam for nothing other than enriching the Arms Industry. But even then we only went so far. And I think the coup de grace came when Clinton, a Democrat, a man that some admire so much for his smile that they would make him king, signed away Glass-Steagall, the death blow to our middle and lower classes. FDR reforms were dead and long live the corruption and tyranny that will follow. The hope is with younger generations that are feeling the pain the most. Maybe they will recognize that it's way past time to throw out the Oligarchy and their puppet politicians.
murielm99
(30,741 posts)Most of us never had Cleaver family comfort. Maybe you did, but if so, you were not the norm. Yes, a lot of us came from working families protected by unions. That meant we had just enough. There was never much left over.
You seem to skip the whole civil rights era. You say nothing about the Cold War, the space race, the deaths by assassination of all our idols. ALL the FDR reforms are dead? Social Security?
And of course, Clinton was the overriding villain of an entire generation. Where did you study history? Your post is, I repeat, ridiculous and lacking in any serious content.
HappyPlace
(568 posts)The fix is in, the wealth class has their Citizens United and their favorite Democrats and Republicans.
If we stick with the current leading candidate, IMHO, they will be happy with it.
We might think that we've won, but on so many important matters we will have lost.
These are the matters that Sanders has been fighting to defend for his entire career.
I wish I could find the OP that talked about how we're screwn either way, the fix is in.
Grrrrr.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)They will try anything to stop him. He told us he will need a movement of millions of people to help him do what needs to be done. He can't do it alone, no one can.
He is keeping his part of the bargain, and we need to do what needs to be done to get the army he needs to begin the process of fixing what they are destroying.
He tells us we do have the power, IF we use it. I find that encouraging, because sometimes I think there is no hope of overcoming the power structure they have built.
But I'm taking his word, he knows more than we do about this.
Biden btw, pretty much said the same thing last week, about the money in politics and how we have to fight it and he said, as Bernie has, that we DO have the power to do so.
It almost sounded like an endorsement of Bernie. I wrote on OP about it and wondered if he too is warning us.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I was so upset to not be able to attend Bernie's rally in Dallas this afternoon. It was 10 minutes from my house. I'm recovering from a mild heart attack and my family is forbidding me from engaging in anything political in nature (I am posting on the sly).
This could very well be my last presidential election and I will not compromise my vote.
One thing I can say for sure about Bernie's candidacy and members of this board --- My admiration for some members grows as I lose all respect for others.
Go Bernie.
artislife
(9,497 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)DFW
(54,380 posts)We need every non-Republican we can muster in Texas. Please stick around! (I had a mild heart attack a few years ago. The people on Walnut Hill lane were top rate, and patched me up pretty well).
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)discussion if even you did it on the sly. Please avoid some very nasty, disgusting op's about our candidate.. looking pretty much like an orchestrated ratf&&k style smear job ... smells likeit anyway. I almost let it get my blood pressure through the roof.
I agree, life is too short, but we still give a damn!
artislife
(9,497 posts)By not taking things personally, focusing on what he represents by his actions and words.
Mental note to self: Bernie himself is a good model in how to handle the onslaught.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and tries desperately to avoid talking about issues.
That is what we have been witnessing, and shamefully right here on a dem forum.
In the past good Dems were destroyed by these tactics, often because they didn't respond quickly enough and forcefully enough.
That isn't going to happen to Bernie. He has an army of volunteers none of whom NEED to be paid, to expose these tactics and lies as soon as they rear their ugly heads. We have the entire Social Media to make their lies infamous and to take them and use them to show how badly we need to get the money out of politics.
But there is no way Bernie's supporters are going to allow liars and deceivers to try to stop him from running his campaign free of these notorious by now, rovian tactics.
Maybe they will learn that it might be best to just talk about the positives of their own candidate.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)who are going to spread it around and stamp out the lies paid for with those Corporate donations.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Otherwise, he would simply be on the ignore list.
It's just a war of words. And most of them are lies
Us and Them
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)I came here precisely to say that. Theyre all scared.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)In other words, more people are likely to not vote for her.
She may lose when the time comes and a lot of people -- including a quarter or more of progressive Democrats -- simply can not vote for her. She's headed in that direction, but it's not too late for Democrats to do what we did quite sensibly in 2008 when she had the same problem. We found another candidate. See, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251452687
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Go Bernie Go!
pocoloco
(3,180 posts)She is the repug's only chance!
Paka
(2,760 posts)They know the idiots in the clown car are worthless, so HRC is all they have.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)other than Bernie been described that way?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)doesn't he?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)And it's going to get uglier as their numbers plummet and Bernie's soars. The "Bernie is a racist" trope is just too precious.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)next lie.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)numbers WILL plummet. I'm hoping the finally give up and just talk about their own candidate. It's odd but they don't do much of that I've noticed.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)She's got a past that they're desperately trying to ignore and/or run from and/or lie about but it's not going to work this time. Hell, it didn't work last time and their sore losers were HORRIBLE to Obama and I say that as an Obama critic.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)are the hypocrites who tore her to pieces the last go around (they know who they are) and are now so smugly on board.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the candidate I though would be best for this country. No need to tear anyone to pieces imo, just don't vote for someone who doesn't represent you.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)London Lover Man
(371 posts)I have noticed nothing specific about Clinton's policies - only that she is leading the polls, and offering nothing but content-free fluff to the 99% and serious policy positions to the 1%.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Next thing you know, by sheer coincidence I'm sure, his first debate question will be "Why don't you care about black people?"
I hope I'm wrong!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Chuckie Toad when he tried to get him to play the game but he ended up not knowing what to do after making several attempts to stay with the 'script'.
It will be a fun to watch actually.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)socialism and class struggle 50 years ago, ie he's out of date. Of course, because we don't have any economic and wealth disparity here, everything's humming along just fine in the US. Not!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And it's no accident. It brushes over his entire career, because it's necessary to do so.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 20, 2015, 01:33 AM - Edit history (1)
everywhere including deep RED AZ last night. Ha! Bernie's only expected to do well in progressive cities like Madison, WI and Portland, ME. But inroads into the Southwest are happening now, like Houston coming up, expected thousands.
In watching last night's Phoenix event video here, that enthusiastic crowd of 11,000+, behind and around Bernie during his tremendous speech shows how much he appeals to wide backgrounds and resonates to the young, Latino, white, black, workers and so many.
BERNIEMENTUM
Summer of Sanders!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Dems, I have seen people from all those demographics state that they will be supporting him even though on some issues, many might disagree. But the over-riding issue all of them care about, is THIS COUNTRY.
All the wedge issues that USED to divide people, have become less important to people across the board as they realize the danger of losing this democracy.
On so many issues, a vast majority of the people actually AGREE. Not being dependent on the Corporate Media anymore, makes a huge difference. Young people especially are not into the MSM so are not being influenced by the Corporate Propaganda.
We are in an exciting time in our history. We can make a difference, it's really up to us.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)What have you done for us lately Bernie. It's amazing how the lies take hold and get repeated over and over again.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Civil Rights, they clearly have an agenda and it isn't Civil Rights.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)We finally have an AUTHENTIC progressive, a REAL leader, a TRUE champion in Bernie Sanders who will look out for the folks on Main Street, instead of all those hedgefund types and corporatists on Wall Street. What a breath of fresh air he is! Go Bernie Go!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)do you disagree with Bernie on, what has he been wrong about re those issues, in your OPINION.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)That was another one of thos fun "facts" you spouted without and backup. Your opinion means very little at this point.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)respond to it. Since I have no clue what you are talking about I cannot address it.
Star Member sabrina 1 (55,620 posts)
56. Your opinion, considering your participation in spreading false
claims about a good candidate who represents all that is good about this country with a record to prove it, is of no consequence to me. You lost any credibility you might have to be complaining at this point by participating in those false claims.
Look it up on your own posts...sheesh
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)attacking Sanders using false claims? I sure haven't seen you defend him against those lies.
I've asked you where you disagree with him on the issues, you haven't responded, but you are there in threads slamming him, joining in, not saying why, not explaining what you don't agree with, I would call that helping to spread false claims about a candidate.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)So now can shut that shit out of your talking points. It would appear that it doesn't matter what is said Or not said, what my opinion is or is not. So not I'm not giving you my opinion on any of Bernie's points you opined in the op.
You pick and chose and spread lies about me. That much is established. Happy?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)post something negative, that's all I have seen regarding your posts. I don't follow people around to see what they are saying of doing, so I can only judge by what I see. I have not once seen you make a positive comment about Sanders so sorry if I missed them. Good for you if you defend a candidate against lies, that is the right thing to do.
But don't expect people to know anything about your comment history if all they see, if all your comments to them, are negative.
artislife
(9,497 posts)And we are lovers!
Right?!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)it!
artislife
(9,497 posts)That is why I am starting to look at who starts the OP and vowing not to post anything.
It works sometimes.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Better to start another one with the FACTS when you see an obvious talking point thread.
Let them drop like a stone where they belong. All my OPs are prompted by theirs. Lol! But I will not feed the talking points, not ever.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #91)
InAbLuEsTaTe This message was self-deleted by its author.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)You can look up his stellar record on civil rights all on your lonesome - because digging for facts is something that is all our responsibility as citizens of a republic.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)She is the one giving her version of "facts" and telling everyone to look it up.
I'll look up jack shit on this topic.
Thanks for your opinion too. At least you don't try to portray it as something else.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)issues. So once again I will give you a chance to discuss why you oppose Sanders on the issues, see the OP and see if we can elevate the discussion to just focusing on the issues. On which of these issues do you disagree with Sanders?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)..of wonderfulness. Your past responses to me have not been so wonderful and kind and without insult.
You can request my opinion of Bernie a millions times but after calling me a liar, you deserve jack.
antigop
(12,778 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)about Bernie on the issues, he has been an exemplary Representative of the People. Thank you for reminding me, I'm sure I have forgotten a whole lot more.
antigop
(12,778 posts)awhile (especially offshoring, TPP, and h-1b's). Bernie has been extremely supportive of labor. I know you know that.
And I thank you for all you do, sabrina.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Labor, Bernie has been outstanding on Labor. And the TPP, yes, another excellent topic, and again, Bernie does the right thing.
Thank you very much for the reminders, it's hard to keep up with him sometimes, the man is amazing!
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Please let your candidate know that while we appreciate that he was marching 40+ years ago, lip service to our very real issues now just isn't enough. We recognize when someone is just trying to throw us a bone to get a vote & it won't work.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and so far as I know, she has not addressed that yet.
Bernie knows the value of Black lives, no one, other than those who are afraid of his excellent record on this issue, doubts that, so I don't need to remind him, he was working on that issue before many people now ready to vote, were born. AND continued to do so throughout his entire life.
As Jesse Jackson said about Bernie, he will remember that when he most needed support in his campaign from his fellow Dems, only two White Elected officials stood up for him. One of them was Bernie Sanders, 20 years AFTER the Civil Rights Movement you have dismissed so casually, and the other was Jim Hightower.
Btw, what was Hillary doing when Bernie was out there working for Civil Rights, getting himself elected?
I focus on my own candidate, why don't Hillary's supporters focus on theirs, rather than Bernie?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Black Church recently, by using the phrase 'all lives matter'.
Odd you all would forget that while claiming to 'care' so much about the issue.
But hey, I focus on my candidate, because there is so much to talk about re issues and having a candidate who has an incredible record on ALL the issues, especially on Civil Rights, there isn't much time for me to spend running around writing OPS about other candidates.
London Lover Man
(371 posts)And nothing to prove or back it up. All the Hillarians has to wait 10 days before confirming her 'stance'.
I'm still questioning on why Clinton punted the $15 minimum wage and insult America with her idea of "profit sharing" instead of an annual raise of 15%.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)But it is never offered to part time employees, and not even to temps, that I'm aware of. Of course, the new trend is to replace as many full-time employees with part-time, as you can get away with. I have no problem with using some temp full-time employees (because that helps to retain permanent full-time workers during a cyclical slow down), but the use of many part-time workers on a regular basis is not fair to people who need full-time jobs. It just makes it easier for the business to not have to offer bennies. Long term temp employees often qualify for some benefits from their temp agencies. And if an opening for full-time comes up, companies will often hire from the temp staff that has already been trained for that job. So it's a good way to get a foot in the door.
Also, profit sharing is determined as a percentage of your wages, so the bigger wage earners (management) get a lot more in profit sharing than the lowest paid employees do. So it has to go hand in hand with livable wages. It will not solve the problems of income inequality in this country. It does help to provide motivation for profitability for a company. It's still an upside down policy...not progressive. But then, I don't expect progressive policy coming from Hillary.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)Keep the jobs here and make sure they are decent ones.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)And tax the wealthy who need to start contributing their share to this country from which they take so much.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Cute.
No...adorable.
tblue
(16,350 posts)Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #41)
InAbLuEsTaTe This message was self-deleted by its author.
artislife
(9,497 posts)heh
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)I am definitely not a Hillary supporter, but I have been very vocal on this board since Bernie announced that he was missing his mark with many minority voters. I am still undecided at this point as many of the candidates don't seem to want to take our views into consideration.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I see people here dismissing the entire Civil Rights Movement and those who were there fighting for the rights of AAs. I know, we all know, this is nothing more than a talking point, and its origins are clear.
But it's politics, we, and Bernie I am sure, expected it. I am glad that Bernie doesn't buy negative talking points and ads. Another reason why I support him.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)majority older white people. Which is why when younger minorities say things to you, you may just want to listen just a little bit since we are quite a large demographic.
Your DU bubble is not the real world.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)spoken for themselves, rather than have all these old people here who claim to speak for them claiming to represent them. They don't.
Guess you haven't been listening, but then, that is why they support Bernie, he does listen to them.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Clearly from your rantings on here you are not conversing with young minority voters anywhere.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)about other DUers and who they are or what they do in RL, though it doesn't stop from ranting and raving about it.
I don't need to save anything, I know these people, some of them are actually HERE on DU. Too bad you have been ignoring them.
mythology
(9,527 posts)why does he register such low levels of support from minorities in polls?
It's one thing to claim what you claim if there is no evidence, but there is plenty of evidence that at this point, you're just wrong.
That isn't to say that Sanders can't or won't increase his support from minorities, but he certainly doesn't have it at this point.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)All of whom are finding out about a candidate they can now support and are probably not on the pollsters' radar. Or maybe the polls are wrong, maybe they are not calling young people who don't have landlines, there are all kinds of reasons not to put one's faith in polls.
What I do know is that Bernie IS getting a lot of support from minorities which really shouldn't be a surrprise.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)In fact, they have done the research and they see that Sanders is the best candidate on civil rights issues past, present and future that the Democratic party has.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)I hate to break it to you but the majority in the BIG bubble are ALSO a majority of older white people. Whites make up 77.7% of the population (as of 2013):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States
And I guess it depends on your definition of "older". But the median age is 37.6. Many would consider 35 and up "older".
http://www.statista.com/statistics/264727/median-age-of-the-population-in-selected-countries/
The only stat that is warped is that we have a large majority of more progressive voters in here, but as far as demographics here in DU it is very much a reflection of the larger population. And I would go further and argue that considering that its the Democratic Party that is the most inclusive in regards to minorities, and youth issues like the War on Drugs, education etc.. that the percentage of minorities and those under 36 on this board would even be above the national average.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)His entire career has been about civil rights. Enough with the "lip service" bullshit.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)movements for Civil Rights in this country. I have never heard a single AA do that, 'oh, that's old news from 50 years ago', so I have to assume this is coming from people to whom it is not important.
To go that far to 'win', to dismiss those who put their freedom and reputations and even lives on the line for political reasons, is truly a sad thing to watch. And it will backfire on their candidate, it is already. I will be showing these comments to voters I am signing up for Bernie, so they can see how little they really care.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)If not Hillary, whom are you supporting?
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)as an after thought. WTF, are you calling clueless? That I am very aware of the racial bias my son's & I live on a daily basis. Or that I have to fear that my son could be shot & killed running to baseball practice because he has headphones on & didn't hear a cop yelling commands at him? But yet Sanders thinks this somehow will be fixed by unemployment rates?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)I have no doubt that your fears are very, very real and I cannot begin to imagine what that feels like, however your last sentence indicates that you really don't know what you're taking about when it comes to Senator Sanders.
It is, however, a bullshit talking point I have heard echoed around here before.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)discussing Sanders & social justice & he did exactly that. He began by discussing black youth incarceration/death rates then immediately jumped to adjusting the unemployment rate.
These two things will not magically fix each other. Giving a black kid a job is not going to stop the cops from racially profiling him & throwing him in jail on trumped up charges or killing him. This is where Sanders is missing his mark big time.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)Because I guarantee sinking him is gonna do you a WHOLE lot more harm than good. I know idealism based on anger is righteous and your cause is righteous, but killing Bernie's campaign is the same thing as shooting yourself in the foot before trying to run a race.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)self appointed most of the time, of speaking for entire demographics, simply by claiming to be a member of that demographic, That seems to be, in their minds, the qualification to speak for millions of people.
And when you tell them that many of the people they have appointed themselves to speak for, do not agree with them, even when those people are right here trying to get their attention, they simply ignore, everything. And we are supposed to take them at face value, because they claim to be part of a particular demographic. I don't think so!
Bernie is attracting young minorities and leaders of those communities while these so-called spokespersons are clearly not aware of what is happening out there in the real world.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)income producing enough, soon that family unit may want to move from the surroundings that they are in. A lot of the police brutalness is brought on by their ideas about where crime breeds, and who breeds. It has always been the aim of low-income persons to get out of the low-income and to "better" surroundings. Bernie understands that income is what equalizes, in the long run. It will do that because minds will change, hopefully, about what makes a person worthwhile. I'm tending to strongly agree with Bernie about income inequality. If a perfect world is beyond reach, then we all need to do what we can to get as close as we can,
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)certain. But why would you NOT actually learn about where candidates stand before making statements about where they stand? You know that people here carefully study the positions AND the records of candidates so they know when someone is merely attacking a candidate.
You have not stated what it is that Sanders isn't saying, hasn't been saying, and doing, that you disagree with. Just the usual generalizations. So what do you want Sanders to do that Obama eg, CAN do since right now HE is the one with the power.
How do you feel about the DOJ's 'report' which was fine, except nothing came of it.
Are you satisfied with Obama's handling of the murders by Cop of AAs? What has HE done to stop it?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I would ask then, who do you think the best candidate on these issues is?
I would say it is Sanders. He has the longest history of any of the candidates being involved in civil rights and his positions are still quite strong in these areas. He has the voting record to back it up and you can look back for twenty years of his speeches to find support for this.
Since you don't have a candidate then are you going after all of the candidates with this level of vigor? Or just Bernie Sanders?
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)needs to continue to work with the current civil rights movement not dismiss them.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...you are so wide of the mark about his stance it's surreal....
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Bernie's got a record of supporting legislation and initiatives that affirm that black lives matter. He marched with Dr. King and stayed true to the ideals of the civil rights era. How is that just "lip service?"
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)him to do now that he isn't doing?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)He has walked the walk his entire life.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)when I read something patently contrived, foolish and childish such as this, I can no longer dismiss the possibility.
Nice job, ace.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)to do with HRC? I've been on this board since Sanders announced stating that his platform wasn't doing enough to embrace social justice for minorities. I'm not on board with any candidate at this time for that exact reason. The lives of my son's & family members come first & nobody is providing any real answers in how to rectify that situation.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)problem with what happened at netroots and the idea that it was orchastrated by Hillary gained no traction with me until I read your post which smacks of contrived and manufactured outrage.
If you really understood how Bill and Hillary Clinton led the effort for increased criminal penalties for non-violent offenders, decimated communities with trade agreements, deregulated wall street banks whcih took advantage of Black communities, supported privatization and corporate driven education system,
then you never would have made such a statement to begin with.
In fact, Obama is pushing TPP, sending MORE jobs to low wage workers in Asia, killing opportunity for both Blacks and Whites.
TPP is something Hillary supports. Perhaps you should direct your outrage with these two individuals, rather than bark at the one person who has done more to fight for equal rights and economic justice than Obama and Clinton combined.
Take the time to study the candidates, their history and their records. HRC is on the wrong side of the issues as it relates to economic opportunity for Black Americans and ALL Americans.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)& once again this response was directed towards this particular candidate & his actions. I have issues with HRC & O'Malley as well. But this OP was a Sanders OP which is why it was written as so & as a minority I take great issue with the social justice movement, especially since I have two teenage son's & live in SC.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)supporting the institutional discrimination against minorities and the non-rich (which is growing larger every day) you have to examine the individuals who have led us to this point. Hillary is THE poster child for the economics behind institutional discrimination in America.
She even announced that her granddaughter should have the same opportunity as any boy born in the same hospital?
So here is a multi-multi-millionaire in the best hospital in Manhattan trying to say her grandkid is somehow disadvantaged!
Talk about tone deaf - the US has the highest infant mortality rate of any developed nation!
And let's not forget her statement that she was "dead broke" leaving the White House.
There is a BIG difference in this primary between the candidates, just as there was between Clinton and Obama. Obama was a disappointment to me post-election, but I promise he was a MUCH better choice than HRC.
Be thankful we have Bernie to counter balance the conservative economics and money interests driving the Clinton campaign.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and I have pointed this out to you before, you are not listening to minorities who don't agree with you, you were even unaware of how many are right here on DU TRYING to be heard above the anti Bernie/Left loud, small group who claim to speak for all minorities.
It's revealing to me that you ignored other minorities on this forum, that you weren't even aware of their existence, that you completely dismissed them with your ageism comment (yeah, old is bad now on a Dem forum) and you think people are blind?
My stepson was attacked by a mob of about 30 white thugs, eg, but hey, who cares, not you right?
Maybe stop and listen for a while to what others are saying before assuming you speak for all of them. You don't.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Is there a list of specific demands? Because I'm sure Bernie would love to see it. What do you really believe Hillary is intending to do to improve the lives of PoC? Because playing footsie with republicans and pushing a neoliberal economic agenda sure ain't gonna help.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)I'm not supporting her either at this point. Why do all of you assume that if someone points out a flaw against one candidate they must be going for another? None of them seem to give 2 shits about minorities in this country at this point, right now we are an after thought.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)that Hillary has PoC, and particularly the AA community, supporting her exclusively. I'm glad you're being thoughtful about who you will ultimately support.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)aren't even supporting her at this point. We aren't blind followers & expect candidates to earn our votes not take them for granted.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)What has Hillary done to earn the votes of the African American community. What legislation has she supported as a Senator?
Number23
(24,544 posts)I have been CRYING laughing at these people all verklempt because people who are being slaughtered in the streets didn't wait their turn to ask questions!!!1 It's just all SOOOOO unfaaaaaaair!!!
I hope BLM do it to all three-five candidates but the backtracking and trying to pretend that this somehow made Sanders look super de dooper is nothing short of hilarious. These same folks who have minimized, ignored and dismissed everything the black posters here have been saying are now doing this tap dance to try to salvage their candidates reputation, even though what many of us have been saying is EXACTLY what the BLM group said as well.
1StrongBlackMan and the AA and many other minority posters here were right. And these folks have now resorted to pretending that an appearance which appears to be fairly disastrous for Sanders was somehow the opposite. Really! Don't trust your lying eyes!!1 He really did great!11
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)Have you seen the tsunami I started in this thread? Of course they all assume I have to be a HRC supporter just because I posted BLM. If anyone has been paying attention they would notice I've been saying the exact same thing since he announced.
Number23
(24,544 posts)have alluded that he sic'd his DHS on OWS, and every manner of BS you can think of are now HOWLING AT THE MOON because a bunch of black folks had the UNMITIGATED NERVE to demand information from the presidential candidates on legitimate issues that affect them.
This same crowd, who have ignored every poll telling them that this was an issue for people of color and who accused the minority posters here who've said the exact same thing as BLM of being "race baiters" and "infiltrators" are now SPUTTERING in impotent rage because the chickens they have burned 1000 calories pretending didn't exist have just come home to roost.
And I'd be lying if I said I wasn't laughing my ass off about it too.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)It's a sad state of affairs when they can't see the writing on the walls. I'm sure they're more pissed that the black folks are actually speaking up & it's not all sunshine & unicorns as they had hoped. But can't say that we didn't warn you.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)... brilliant strategy...
Response to Number23 (Reply #104)
Post removed
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)But by driving this wedge you are playing into the hands of slimebags like Karl Rove and the Koch brothers. You are being USED as a wedge issue. I mean, think about how you picked up on this: where did the idea come from? who first shared it with you? where did they get it? how did it start? (for how did it start, I'm not talking about the horrible police brutality or murders of black kids - I'm talking about this idea about Bernie - because trying to make someone's main strength be perceived a weakness is classic Karl Rove)
This divide and conquer strategy has promoted racism for centuries, NOT done anything to help get rid of it.
If Bernie, who IS ARGUABLY THE BEST CANDIDATE the African-American community has had since Bobby Kennedy, loses because of this wedge issue, then you know who will be laughing the hardest?
The Koch brothers and their slimy ilk, because then they can continue ripping us all off while at the same time setting us against each other, and the racists, who of course will get to still be racist - because if you think the other corporatist candidates will be doing anything about social justice issues, sorry but it ain't gonna happen.
But this is, giftedgirl, the way of peace, of working within the system. I know many young people are tired of doing that because it doesn't look like it's been working too well. However, and sadly, the alternative is pitchforks. But how has that EVER worked out? In the end most of the blood in the streets will be yours, and you'll have done nothing substantive to end racism and achieve social justice. In fact, you'll have made racism worse by compounding it with even more tragedy.
If you wish, you can read FAR more about just how the divide and conquer strategy has promoted racism in 'A People's History of the United States' by Howard Zinn. While I acknowledge that Zinn is a dead white guy, the truths in this book are timeless and certainly relevant here.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)This is our livelihoods at stake. If you have been paying attention here at DU you would see that many of us minority members have been trying to get our point across that social justice is very much an issue for us. Much more of an issue than economic justice because regardless of our economic status we still suffer social injustices.
All we have been trying to do is get the candidates to listen & understand how important this is to us & that it is an issue that we will hang our vote on. Why, would we do that you say? Because our lives depend on it, our children's lives depend on it, our, husband's & sister's lives depend on it. This isn't a wedge issue, we aren't stupid. We know there is no hope at all in voting for a Republican, but we want our voices heard by the Democratic candidates. It's not all about the banks & Wall Street, it's about guaranteeing that my kid's can go to the park or store without getting shot simply because they are brown.
Our votes need to be earned & I need to know that there's a reason other than some financial bullshit that I'm sending them to office.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)And why did the activists at Net Roots shout him down instead of listening and then asking pointed questions?
I admit I am a 56 yo white guy who has enjoyed unearned white privilege all his middle class life, but it seems to me that the Net Roots debacle did no one any good at all, and to tear down Bernie as a candidate will be even worse.
I mean, the analogy is you're on a sinking ship and you got a klown lifeboat that's about to sink, you got a corporatist life boat that is pretty leaky for the open sea, and then you got a decent but old lifeboat that does not leak and can get you to shore. You gonna poke holes in that lifeboat?
By the way, I know I got white privilege, but that doesn't mean I don't want to puke every time I think about those kids killed just because of their skin color. Because that shit does affect me. It affects all of us. I raised two kids and I never had to have the escalation of force conversation with either of them about how not to get killed when a cop stops you, and when Trayvon got killed I thought here's a regular kid, just like the two I raised, decides to walk to the store and get some candy. Just like any other kid. And then he never comes back because some dirtbag decides he doesn't 'belong' because he is black.
And look at Sandra Bland. I am guilty of not using my signal from time to time, speeding, let's be honest. So are my kids, both of whom are grown now. And I think what if that was my daughter, my precious daughter? Killed by some 'roidal dirtbag in a shithole Texas jail, for what?
And the dozens of others. I get it, and I feel it, and I promise you that I personally will do (and am doing) everything I can in my own community to help. But what in the world can Bernie do that he hasn't already done, and will continue to do because he's proven that he will for 40 years now? What specific acts can he take?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Brilliant.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Last edited Mon Jul 20, 2015, 03:18 AM - Edit history (1)
This matters to us, yes, it definitely does.
Personally, I want more protests. I want bigger protests. I want BLM to get out there like OWS has done. I want this to be an important issue during this entire election season.
Now how do I go about doing that?
Young activists today are using Post New Left tactics and language. Older progressive activists are versed in New Left tactics and language.
Post New Left language is antagonistic and divisive.
Read this -- http://publicautonomy.org/2014/01/27/the-rise-of-the-post-new-left-political-vocabulary/
In particular note the differences between alliances and allies, consciousness raising versus calling out, and liberation versus a safe space.
This difference in language reflects why all here who support BLM are discussing why they think it was or was not the best course of action for what occured at NrN.
Post New Leftists? Oh, hell, yes, call out other progressive allies in order to get safety for blacks.
New Leftists? Oh, hell, no, that did not raise awareness. It potentially alienated those who will form an alliance with us, and it failed to recognize that we are all oppressed right now by corporatists.
Even though I may not agree with their posts in total, I do agree with their support and sentiments.
And at the same time, this issue is being used by some both at DU and in the social media universe as a wedge issue.
That is how this type of politics is done. Find your opponents strength. Amplify any mis-steps that allow you to attack their strong areas, and pit groups against each other using surrogates to do your dirty work. This has been going on for decades.
It is not just minority votes that need earned. All votes do. And if you are falling for the Third Way propaganda that social justice and economic justice are separate such that financial discussions are just bullshit, then you are working against your stated goals.
They are not separate. We need both as individuals and as a community.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)You need to make this an OP. Seriously, I've never seen it spelled out so concisely.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)here are only interested in the politics of all this, as an issue to use, as is done every election cycle.
TM99
(8,352 posts)replied to any of questions to them on this topic.
There are definitely a few posters here who want to take this important issue and use it as a cudgel against their opposing candidate. It is patently obvious!
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Different behavior in this one? I don't want to presume, but if you want people to know you need to tell them.
I think you are justified in jumping right in the goddam middle of it, since you may not live out the day. But at the end of that day you want to be further than you were this morning.
So that deserves some thought as to strategy, since you want to avoid wasting the time you have. Most people can relate to that.
What do you want?
tblue
(16,350 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)If you don't value Bernie's life experience . fine. there's no point in entering this discussion then is there?
Agony
(2,605 posts)Have a victory party on the other side
and then the real work will begin.
first we have to hoe the row, and the rule is, never look down the row to see how far away the end is
concentrate on the plant in front of you.
we WILL get there, it has always been a tough row to hoe
justice
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)A typical strategy when they don't want to talk about policies because theirs don't help average Americans.
Bernie always talks about policy, and that puts them in an awkward position.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)their own candidate look bad.
They should talk about their candidate, rather than Bernie, but if that's what they want to do, it's not our problem. But we WILL correct any lies told about our candidate, let them cry all they want over that, but too bad.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Excellent. The truth cannot be turned into a lie, and we will not be distracted from electing Bernie Sanders.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)their leadership. Time for a change.
And, thanks for all the hard work getting the truth out!
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)You do Bernie proud...
Go Bernie!
silenttigersong
(957 posts)for your efforts and dedication.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)captured for posterity on YouTube or heard in person by perilously over-capacity audiences--never "I might do something some years down the road--after all, I'm in the right party for it! vote for me and I'll do whatever you think I want"
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)for another month and then call him a "brocialist" who wants to ban abortion
maybe they'll up the Marcionist talk about the "Old Testament God" (since we all know what that means)
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)what they can do with it. It's tricky planning a smear campaign on the Left. They have to be careful.
hack89
(39,171 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)economic conditions are forcing changes to the business model - and then sends 1500 jobs to India.
There is a corporate authoritarian streak to the new Democratic Party that is unhealthy for Democracy and better left to Republicans.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)He was involved in civil rights at the UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, when he was an undergraduate student there. Bernie was there for three years and completed a BA degree in political science. When he graduated in 1964, he married his first wife, bought a summer home in Vermont and worked and lived in Brooklyn and eventually moved to Vermony in 1968. He also lived on a KIbbutz for a year before moving to Vermont permanently. The extent of his extensive civil rights involvement was limited to his college years which was what it was for a lot of "white" college students back in the day. I know this because I grew up during this time.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Both were there during this period. We KNOW what Bernie was doing, and you left out quite a few things btw, but not to worry, but you do make me think about Hillary and Bill Clinton also around at that time and I would love to know what part they played in the Civil Rights Movement?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)In 1965, Rodham enrolled at Wellesley College, where she majored in political science.[19] During her first year, she served as president of the Wellesley Young Republicans;[20][21] with this Rockefeller Republican-oriented group,[22] she supported the elections of Mayor John Lindsay and Senator Edward Brooke.[23] She later stepped down from this position, as her views changed regarding the American Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War.[20] In a letter to her youth minister at this time, she described herself as "a mind conservative and a heart liberal".[24] In contrast to the 1960s current that advocated radical actions against the political system, she sought to work for change within it.[25] In her junior year, Rodham became a supporter of the antiwar presidential nomination campaign of Democrat Eugene McCarthy.[26] Following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., Rodham organized a two-day student strike and worked with Wellesley's black students to recruit more black students and faculty.[26] In early 1968, she was elected president of the Wellesley College Government Association and served through early 1969;[25][27] she was instrumental in keeping Wellesley from being embroiled in the student disruptions common to other colleges.[25] A number of her fellow students thought she might some day become the first female President of the United States.[25] To help her better understand her changing political views, Professor Alan Schechter assigned Rodham to intern at the House Republican Conference, and she attended the "Wellesley in Washington" summer program.[26] Rodham was invited by moderate New York Republican Representative Charles Goodell to help Governor Nelson Rockefeller's late-entry campaign for the Republican nomination.[26] Rodham attended the 1968 Republican National Convention in Miami. However, she was upset by the way Richard Nixon's campaign portrayed Rockefeller and by what she perceived as the convention's "veiled" racist messages, and left the Republican Party for good.[26]
Rodham wrote her senior thesis, a critique of the tactics of radical community organizer Saul Alinsky, under Professor Schechter.[28] (Years later, while she was First Lady, access to the thesis was restricted at the request of the White House and it became the subject of some speculation.)[28] In 1969, she graduated with a Bachelor of Arts,[29] with departmental honors in political science.[28] Following pressure from some fellow students,[30] she became the first student in Wellesley College history to deliver its commencement address.[27] Her speech received a standing ovation lasting seven minutes.[25][31][32] She was featured in an article published in Life magazine,[33] due to the response to a part of her speech that criticized Senator Brooke, who had spoken before her at the commencement.[30] She also appeared on Irv Kupcinet's nationally syndicated television talk show as well as in Illinois and New England newspapers.[34] That summer, she worked her way across Alaska, washing dishes in Mount McKinley National Park and sliming salmon in a fish processing cannery in Valdez (which fired her and shut down overnight when she complained about unhealthy conditions).[35]
Hillary also completed law school and sat for the bar. In 1974, Hillary was one of the Congressional staf lawyers for the Nixon impeachment. Hillary formed relationships with AA women and men back in the day that have endured over the years because that's who she is.
Again I'm a BIDEN supporter. HRC is my second choice. I want a REAL DEMOCRAT, which Bernie is not. I want a lawyer (Bernie is not) because I don't believe less is more. I want a senator current or past. I want someone who has the temperment to be President. Both Vice President Joe Biden and HRC meet that standard. There are some real issues with HRC that no one has brought up. It's not so much about her as it is about the baggage she brings with her. One of her strengths is her willingness to do battle with the NRA. I like that, really really like that. VP BIDEN will let us know if he's running in August. If he doesn;t run, I'll put my support behind HRC.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)anything concrete. But then she wasn't sure of where she stood politically. Bernie otoh, knew exactly where he stood and still does, never had to evolve on the issues that have dominated this society throughout his entire life.
Biden agrees with Bernie re the money in politics, and made a statement very similar to Bernie's long time statements regarding the corrosive effects of money on our electoral system and the entire government.
If he does run, hopefully he will take his own advice, which he gave to other Dems, and not accept that money as that is the only way to neutralize its effects until we get it legally removed.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)endorsed Jesse Jackson the progressive Democratic candidate that scared the DLC so much that they created a Bill Clinton presidency.
Yes, that damned progressive caucus sure did nothing for civil rights.
For someone who you know grew up during this time, you sure weren't paying much attention were you?
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I am laser focused on providing whatever support he needs to successfully beat down the lies and allow the TRUTH of his character shine through .....
Bernie is the real deal ... I've got his back because he has our backs ...
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)That may be so but swift boaters successfully used the same tactics to ruin John Kerry in 2004.
The difference is this time it's coming from inside the house.
Bernie Sanders went there in good faith yesterday specifically to talk about the issues.
That is a fact.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)such problem, we will fight back, we will expose the lies, and if they want that fight, bring it on.
I despise liars and deceivers, people pretending to 'care' out to do HARM to this country by attempting to deprive the people of the choices they are entitled to.
This candidate is worth fighting for and I know his army of volunteers won't hestitate to do so. They are taking on more than they chew if the think they will get away with lies and deceptions as the Swift Boaters did.
No WAY is that going to happen this time.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thank you.
The people who are using this opportunity to lie about Sanders because he's better than their candidate are truly vile.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and we need to get it out of our politics. First get the money out, then they won't be paying for these despicable negative ads and talking points.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)Inside the Karl Rove house, maybe. or perhaps the Koch brothers mansion and think tanks. I mean, if we actually followed the money, that's where it would probably lead.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)We all know who's doing it and why.
PatrickforO
(14,574 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)I will not waver. Surrender is not an option.
My children's and their children's very future is on the line.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Thank you.
K&R
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I will grant you that she is very high on opinions however. I just don't think she always knows the difference.
For,instance she claimed on another thread today that I spread lies about Bernie....but has yet to prove that opinion with fact. Then there was the time she claimed that she knows for a fact that the BLM call out at the Netroots event was coordinated by other candidates, or some such nonsense. She said it was a fact. But then even after repeated requests by multiple DUers was not able to back any of it up.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that rather than address the TOPIC of the OP or the ISSUES mentioned, you prefer to talk about ME, but seriously, it's a boring subject not to mention you tend to distort things when you paraphrase them that way.
If that's your think, fine, but don't get all huffy when someone points out that you do not contribute positive content to threads.
That's a nice little personal attack right there, not nearly as bad as some I've experienced, but personal never the less.
So, again, let me ask you to comment on the ISSUES listed in the OP and where you disagree with Bernie on any of them?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)yourself.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)I gave her a c & p of her own words, since she claimed to have conveniently forgotten. Look up thread.
As for the other claim...it was one of many responses she gave to bump one of her own OPs. Maybe looking up for yourself instead of Interjecting your own fact deficient comments
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)What you didn't do was explain what was incorrect in the post.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)You asked for proof of your own words. Your words that said I/Sheepshank was responsible for spreading lies. I gave you a C&P of your own words and gave you the proof.
Now you deny it again? What a joke.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)I have a whole list of reasons to be here Sabrina 1 but as of late, you sit atop my list.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)those who support this candidate, and for some who don't, but don't get involved in the negative campaigning we are seeing.
Again, thank you so much for your very nice comment and the same to you.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)...those who divide us profit from their foul efforts. One candidate alone seeks to unite us against the profiteers. He is correct, we must unite if we are to prevail. It would be horrible if voices such as yours were to be given a time-out or worse a pizza. Here at DU, we are the 90%. May I suggest, those of us DUers who have pledged ourselves to seeing Senator Sanders become President, that as a body, we shut off the negative campaigners by placing them on ignore. This way, our efforts to aid Senator Sanders can not be distracted, nor shall we lose valuable educators.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Flatulo
(5,005 posts)i'm very proud to support him in the upcoming primaries.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thank you, sabrina.
tblue
(16,350 posts)I'm very proudly supporting Bernie. I think I'll wear my Bernie t-shirt today.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)It is the PEOPLE's turn and no one else's.
No more candidates bought and paid for by the banksters, the MIC and the "security state."
pa28
(6,145 posts)We're going to have to endure ever more ugly smears along the way but we have the record and the truth on our side.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)carolinayellowdog
(3,247 posts)daybranch
(1,309 posts)But MSM likes to point out Bernies hair. So sd they cannot find anything wrong with his ideas. At the same time, nPost says Latinos are flocking to Hillary after Trump speeches. Latinos if anything are moving to Bernie, based on his recepti0on and Speech at La Razza.
Hillary has only one direction to go in terms of voter support and that is down.Her refusal to back Glass-Steagull reinstatement and her support of the TTP are highly unpopular , especially with progressive activists which are moving the DEMOCRATIC party against Wall Street and Corporatists.
Hillary Clinton wants to grab the support of women and has been a champion of women but so has Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden. Yet while she likes to say women's issues are family issues, shewill be hounded by the women themselves who are very aware that the health and wellbeing of their family has too often been sacrificed for benefit of her now donors.
Hillary is a victim of her own making. She chose her side and the people recognize that the money financing her campaign is an investment by the rich in order to get richer. It is not so much that the people resent rich people, people resent greed which robs their families of the dignity they deserve. The history of the American people is replete with calls to stop manipulation of our government and our economy by the rich. We had calls for leveling before the American Revolution, we had the Regulators who worked to remove the control of the rich, we had the motto during the instalation of our first income tax which was "Soak the Rich". It is now like many many social movements, the coming together of forces and ideas to change our society and our economy. Hillary is a victim of this movement. She must be or we will all be a continued victim of the reign of the rich over our democracy. Go Berne!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to rise in the polls. So obviously as soon as people learn about him, and they look at his record, they are sold, and it is across the board, including even Repubs who are disgusted with their own party.
Good post, welcome to DU.
NealK
(1,867 posts)Stardust
(3,894 posts)Paka
(2,760 posts)So clear and to the point. We are indeed lucky to have such a wonderful man to support. It is a joy to hear him and get energized. If we just keep working hard, honesty will win in the end.
2banon
(7,321 posts)golfguru
(4,987 posts)switch my support to Bernie. I think an honest man who genuinely cares for all people deserves consideration.
But I am still a big fan of the Clinton's.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)to just throw their primary election and any and everything else just make sure there is no way Bernie or anything like him gets into office. In a inner-connected way this kind of seems to be what is going on with the Trump bid?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... been teaching their rank-and-file to hate her for 25 years so it would be damned hard to do "under the radar."
nolabels
(13,133 posts)these billionaire bulldogs that watch their turf with the zeal are using much the same type of software. Statistics to predict just about anything in any scenario. Well of course there isn't any real complete model of US elections to compare to but with billions at stake one can be sure they are trying a lot of work around's in trying to figure out people decisions way before they make them. Like look how they use marketing especially over the internet. Sometimes it's almost scary the way it works sometimes.
The way the corporatist sold WW2 and 9/11 to rest of the world and also have been able keep it mostly under wraps tells me just about anything is possible when it come these billionaires guarding their franchise.
If you had their mentality and were in their positions what do you think you would be doing and do you think you would leave things to chance if their was a possibility that you might not have to? Sure they own a lot of politicians but a voting public also has a potential francise that might be manipulated to some extent.
This idea is kind of off the wall but from the things i heard about in the last five, ten or even fifteen years that check out i don't put anything past the freaks that orchestrate such things.
The myths they would try to sell only works if the people that they are be told to don't understand and see them coming before they get here and that is the only reason i ponder them
Just a couple of thoughts
Scuba
(53,475 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026993936
I find it humorous only because the people who he ridicules are the same ones that deny that field of science even exists.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Honesty makes it all so much easier.
Yet there are those who insist If we keep doing the same thing we will have different results, this time for sure.
The only thing that can defeat a quiet truth is a louder lie. Thanks to the best individual efforts of Wall St investors, that lie will roar louder than ever.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)But I hate to say that I don't believe this fucked up country (and those who believe they own it) will ever embrace someone like him.
I do hope I'm wrong.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)DO want to say how sincerely dedicated I am to supporting BERNIE SANDERS. Doing all I can, have my bumper stickers on both of our vehicles and talk about him and his record when others give me the "But, he can't win meme!" Oh, IT'S HILLARY, etc. as we all know. I see him drawing such big crowds, but the REAL FEAR is what TPTB are AND will do to keep him down.
We simply have to doing all we can, give it our best and if in the end... well we'll have to do what I don't really WANT to do in any way, but I always vote. It will be with a heavier heart than usual! Not giving up with my support in any way and only mention the alternative here, otherwise I do try to not talk about "the one" as little as possible and only when needed to make comparison.
So, FOCUS, FOCUS, FOCUS and keep our spirits HIGH and PUSH BACK as hard as we can!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)jalan48
(13,865 posts)He won't give up getting his message out regardless of the obstacles put in his path. His vision of what is wrong with the US is too clear to be muddled at this point in time.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)just kicking this to say 'Bernie Supporters are the Best'!