2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy Hillary Clinton Lacks Credibility On Criminal Justice Reform
For critics who have long argued that our criminal justice system puts too many people behind bars for too long, Clintons words of outrage were welcome. But they were also hard to take seriously given her history on this issue. While condemning overincarceration, she glided over her own role in promoting it and exaggerated her efforts to correct it. She referred only obliquely to the war on drugs, which has played an important role in sending nonviolent offenders to prison. And three decades after the prison population began the dramatic climb that she now considers shameful, Clinton offered almost no specific ideas for reversing it, which makes her look like a dilettante compared to politicians in both major parties who have given the issue serious thought.
As first lady in the 1990s, Clinton was a cheerleader for the tough on crime policies that produced the era of mass incarceration she now condemns. We need more police, she said in a 1994 speech. We need more and tougher prison sentences for repeat offenders. The three strikes and youre out for violent offenders has to be part of the plan. We need more prisons to keep violent offenders for as long as it takes to keep them off the streets. The Clinton administration gave us all that and more, bragging about building more prisons, locking up more people (including nonviolent offenders) for longer stretches, opposing parole, expanding the death penalty, putting more cops on the street, and implementing a comprehensive anti-drug strategy.
During another debate that December, Clinton was asked whether she regretted how your husbands crime bill
has affected the black community, or do you stand by that? Both, apparently:
I think that the results not only at the federal level but at the state level have been an unacceptable increase in incarceration across the board, and now we have to address that
.There were reasons why the Congress wanted to push through a certain set of penalties and increase prison construction, and there was a lot of support for that across a lot of communities because
the crime rate in the early 90s was very high. And people were being victimized by crime in their homes, in their neighborhoods and their business. But weve got to take stock now of the consequences, so thats why
I want to have a thorough review of all of the penalties.
As Dara Lind notes at Vox, Clinton nevertheless attacked her rival Barack Obama as soft on crime because he thought some of those penalties were too harsh. A month after Clinton decried an unacceptable increase in incarceration, her campaign tried to undermine Obama by citing his criticism of mandatory minimums.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacobsullum/2015/04/30/why-hillary-clinton-lacks-credibility-on-criminal-justice-reform/
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Locking their doors all the time, must have an increase of crime.