Hillary supporters will point to other polls and call this poll outlier. However all the other polls I have seen are national vs swing states.

I have always said Hillary will be unpopular with the general public. Her only option is to run negative campaign and hope the Republican candidate is less popular. This will be tough due to money the other side is going to raise. Plus negative campaigns tend to reduce turnout which favors Republicans.

other Democratic candidates will fare much better, assuming this particular poll is accurate, and didn't over sample republicans, because they ASSUMED that Democrats won't show up. That worked out very well for Gallop in the 2012 election, where they came in dead last.

Other polls are needed to confirm this. It should be kept in mind for whatever reason those states voted for the likes of joni ernst and Walker in Wisconsin, and that indicates what they are calling swing states, are more purple than not

There's a lot at stake this election. We need senate victories as well.

mean good news for any of the Democratic candidates in the race. Anyone looking at the positions of those republicans from going to war, to the war against women, one has to conclude either the polling over sampled republicans, or those states have turned hard right and lost their fu**ing minds

... and I've said all along that Hillary Clinton is a loser here.

Clinton trails GOP candidates in early Colorado poll
http://www.9news.com/story/news/local/politics/2015/07/22/hillary-clinton-quinnipiac-survey/30496739/

If a Democrat cannot win Colorado, Virginia, Nevada ... then it is going to be tough. Winning in those swing states also shows wide appeal -- a characteristic the Clinton campaign simply does not have and will make even carrying Ohio and Florida difficult.

Democrats are really letting themselves in for a big fall if they stick to this Clinton inevitability meme.
Yes, a Bush can get elected; yes, a Walker can get elected; yes, a Kasich can get elected; yes, a Roubio can get elected.

Unfortunately, I'm not seeing the activist-class that is paying attention this early in the process taking the real possibility of a Clinton defeat seriously.

I so wish Hillary would get out and let one of the fresh faces put forth a new vision for the Democratic Party and the nation. But sadly I think she and Bill are too in love with money and power to do the right thing.

brunt of attacks from the right-wing and the "liberal" media. If Sanders or O'Malley take the lead, they'll be subjected to the same scrutiny and attacks.

Bernie 2016. Period. No other alternatives.

Hillary 2016. Reality.

She'll go down like in 2008. Deja Vu Part II.

HAND...

September 2014:

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/poll-bob-beauprez-john-hickenlooper-111047.html

Right wing infiltration?

and using one of their big misses as proof.

In the same poll they nailed the Senate race in Colorado.

It's happened to other countries.

1. Too far out to mean anything but.... it should send trembles. Unfavorability always plays a part in elections.

2. To dismiss polls out of hand by declaring them bad pollsters with little to no back up on that account does no one a service. Nate Silver grades them B+

Yes you weren't dismissing but GT upthread most assuredly is.

November 3, 2014 - Beauprez-45%, Hickenlooper-43% In Colorado Gov Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Gardner At 45% To Udall's 43% In Senate Race

Final results:

Gardner beat Udall.

Only it turned out to be the opposite, and because Udall was DLC/Third Wayer, they decided to opt for the real thing.

which they missed.

They hit the Senate race

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/colorado/release-detail?ReleaseID=2111

I seriously think that if Bernie won the nomination, he would struggle to win California, especially against a "perceived" moderate like Kasich.

But that is just the latest Quinniapiac poll, which seems to be an outlier.

And that despite no daily attacks from Fox like Clinton is enduring. At least Clinton gets in the 40s, and this polling outfit tends to lean GOP.

Here are all of Hillary's and Bernie's numbers against top GOP contenders in those three states:

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2261

these idiots would vote to starve up their kids first.

Obama being elected twice is proof of that.

The fact that her favorables have been sinking in poll after poll should be alarming Hillary and her supporters. The fact that her trustworthy #s are so low that she is bordering on unelectable should terrify all Dems. The only president who got elected with trustworthy #s as low as Hillary's is Bill Clinton in 1996. Difference being he was running for re-election and he is one of the best politicians of his time. Hillary is not running for re-election and is an average politician at best.

What's most terrifying is her #s are falling quickly in Iowa, the state that has spent the most time with her up-close. That means she is actually becoming less likable and less trustworthy as voters see more of her.

Why on earth would we nominate such a damaged candidate?