2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhich Candidate will do the best job at addressing Climate Change?
Just to see where we are I am selecting what key issues people seem to care about from this post --> http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251469004 If you want to suggest future polls like this one, you can post responses there.
I should point out that caring a great deal about one issue, does not mean you don't care about any other issue.
Bryant
6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Hillary Clinton | |
1 (17%) |
|
Bernie Sanders | |
5 (83%) |
|
Martin O'Malley | |
0 (0%) |
|
Another Democratic Candidate I haven't thought about (sorry!) | |
0 (0%) |
|
One of the Republican Candidates for some reason | |
0 (0%) |
|
This bullshit poll is bullshit | |
0 (0%) |
|
I like to vote! | |
0 (0%) |
|
All of the democratic candidates are likely to do a good job on this issue. | |
0 (0%) |
|
All of the democratic candidates are likely to do a bad job on this issue. | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I think there's a lot of variables outside of the candidates themselves that might affect the answer to that. One might be more passionate, but less able to get people behind them, another less so, but more effective. It's a crapshoot. (But obviously a Democrat, given that the RW clowns are all denialists.)
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I did add options at the bottom for those who feel like the candidates will all do a bad job or a good job on the issue.
Bryant
4139
(1,893 posts)Hillary would be off the scale on compromise...
FSogol
(45,525 posts)"I believe, within 35 years, our country can, and should, be 100% powered by clean energy, supported by millions of new jobs," O'Malley writes. "To reach this goal we must accelerate that transition starting now."
"As president, on day one, I would use my executive power to declare the transition to a clean energy future the number one priority of our Federal Government."
Whole article here:
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/martin-omalley-clean-energy-candidate
The specifics of O'Malley's plan:
-Launch a seemingly New Deal-styled Clean Energy Job Corps that would retrofit buildings for efficiency and build green spaces
-Have the EPA enforce a "zero tolerance" methane leak policy (currently, natural gas production releases a staggering amount of the super-greenhouse gas into the atmosphere)
-Call on Congress to enact a carbon cap that would charge companies for their carbon pollution, and return the revenue to lower and middle class families
-Deny the Keystone XL and halt offshore oil drilling in Alaska
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)because there was a report a few months back that something like 36% of the natural gas coming out of one of the fields (Bakken, maybe?) was simply being 'flared off'. I don't know if that was a 'peak' amount for that month only, or an ongoing thing or what. But it completely does away with the notion that 'natural gas' is so much 'cleaner'. It may pollute less at the point of use, but apparently there's a lot of polluting being done at the point of 'collection'.
FSogol
(45,525 posts)According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, when fugitive methane emissions exceed 3.2 percent, the climate benefits of natural gas are negated and climate change is accelerated. Recent scientific studies of natural gas operations have reported fugitive methane emissions of 9 percent.
Colorado, Ohio and Wyoming have all enacted stringent and enforceable regulations to curb such emissions. In Colorado, a zero tolerance policy requires natural gas companies to find and fix methane leaks, as well as install technology that captures 95 percent of emissions of both volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which cause air pollution, and methane.