Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 08:35 AM Jul 2015

Which Candidate will do the best job at addressing Climate Change?

Just to see where we are I am selecting what key issues people seem to care about from this post --> http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251469004 If you want to suggest future polls like this one, you can post responses there.

I should point out that caring a great deal about one issue, does not mean you don't care about any other issue.

Bryant


6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Hillary Clinton
1 (17%)
Bernie Sanders
5 (83%)
Martin O'Malley
0 (0%)
Another Democratic Candidate I haven't thought about (sorry!)
0 (0%)
One of the Republican Candidates for some reason
0 (0%)
This bullshit poll is bullshit
0 (0%)
I like to vote!
0 (0%)
All of the democratic candidates are likely to do a good job on this issue.
0 (0%)
All of the democratic candidates are likely to do a bad job on this issue.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which Candidate will do the best job at addressing Climate Change? (Original Post) el_bryanto Jul 2015 OP
I really don't know. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #1
That's a good point; I guess you just have to use your best judgement el_bryanto Jul 2015 #4
Take 2 things: persuading the public and a small amount of compromise. 4139 Jul 2015 #2
Why not ask, which candidate has the most comprehensive, most workable plan to combat climate change? FSogol Jul 2015 #3
Does he define methane 'leak'? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #5
Colorado already has that standard. FSogol Jul 2015 #6

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. I really don't know.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 08:42 AM
Jul 2015

I think there's a lot of variables outside of the candidates themselves that might affect the answer to that. One might be more passionate, but less able to get people behind them, another less so, but more effective. It's a crapshoot. (But obviously a Democrat, given that the RW clowns are all denialists.)

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
4. That's a good point; I guess you just have to use your best judgement
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:36 AM
Jul 2015

I did add options at the bottom for those who feel like the candidates will all do a bad job or a good job on the issue.

Bryant

4139

(1,893 posts)
2. Take 2 things: persuading the public and a small amount of compromise.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:15 AM
Jul 2015

Hillary would be off the scale on compromise...

FSogol

(45,525 posts)
3. Why not ask, which candidate has the most comprehensive, most workable plan to combat climate change?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:26 AM
Jul 2015
That leaves Martin O'Malley, the former mayor of Baltimore and two-term governor of Maryland, who's trailing all of the above in the polls. In the wake of the pope's headline-grabbing encyclical on the environment, which champions the moral need to fight global warming and calls for a swift transition from fossil fuels to clean energy, the presidential contender published an op-ed in USA Today outlining an extremely ambitious plan to do precisely that.

"I believe, within 35 years, our country can, and should, be 100% powered by clean energy, supported by millions of new jobs," O'Malley writes. "To reach this goal we must accelerate that transition starting now."

"As president, on day one, I would use my executive power to declare the transition to a clean energy future the number one priority of our Federal Government."


Whole article here:

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/martin-omalley-clean-energy-candidate

The specifics of O'Malley's plan:

-Create a national Renewable Energy Standard that would mandate 100 percent clean energy by 2050
-Launch a seemingly New Deal-styled Clean Energy Job Corps that would retrofit buildings for efficiency and build green spaces
-Have the EPA enforce a "zero tolerance" methane leak policy (currently, natural gas production releases a staggering amount of the super-greenhouse gas into the atmosphere)
-Call on Congress to enact a carbon cap that would charge companies for their carbon pollution, and return the revenue to lower and middle class families
-Deny the Keystone XL and halt offshore oil drilling in Alaska

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. Does he define methane 'leak'?
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:49 AM
Jul 2015
Have the EPA enforce a "zero tolerance" methane leak policy (currently, natural gas production releases a staggering amount of the super-greenhouse gas into the atmosphere)


because there was a report a few months back that something like 36% of the natural gas coming out of one of the fields (Bakken, maybe?) was simply being 'flared off'. I don't know if that was a 'peak' amount for that month only, or an ongoing thing or what. But it completely does away with the notion that 'natural gas' is so much 'cleaner'. It may pollute less at the point of use, but apparently there's a lot of polluting being done at the point of 'collection'.

FSogol

(45,525 posts)
6. Colorado already has that standard.
Thu Jul 23, 2015, 09:59 AM
Jul 2015
One of the natural gas industry’s advertising claims is that natural gas burns cleaner than coal and is therefore better for the environment. While that is true, that is not the whole story.

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, when fugitive methane emissions exceed 3.2 percent, the climate benefits of natural gas are negated and climate change is accelerated. Recent scientific studies of natural gas operations have reported fugitive methane emissions of 9 percent.

Colorado, Ohio and Wyoming have all enacted stringent and enforceable regulations to curb such emissions. In Colorado, a “zero tolerance” policy requires natural gas companies to find and fix methane leaks, as well as install technology that captures 95 percent of emissions of both volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which cause air pollution, and methane.
Diane Drier
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Which Candidate will do t...