that the talking heads are now pushing Sharrod Brown as VP and not Castro.
( Not that Brown is not great, but I sure love Castro)

On topic: two of my female neighbors are Republicans. Both plan to vote for Hillary.
One is going to change her registration.

It doesn't matter whether it's Bernie or Hillary. Both can drink the GOP's milkshake with different groups of 'Republican' voters.

Oh and go women!

Its time, make your voices heard!

Given voting history, I think it is foolish to count on that happening on a large scale, even with a woman at the head of the Democratic ticket.

republican women simply don't prioritize women's issues that highly. If they did, they wouldn't be republicans in the first place.

I know a number who are planning to cross over.

To me it is most logical that if republican women highly prioritized women's issues, they wouldn't be republicans. They rate other republican agenda items as much more significant.

There, of course, will always be a few outliers. There are, after all, gay republicans and black republicans.

I tend to think some of all this priority would have shown up by now, the difference has been night and day for decades. Let's get real, Clinton isn't on some quantum leap over the Democratic party on women's health and many yes women are TeaPubliKlans specifically because they are anti choice and aren't awaiting Hillary Tubman to lead them past their husbands into the land of reason.

If they were where Clinton is they wouldn't be voting TeaPubliKlan in this day and age.

and I personally think both declared male candidates would be better advocates for women than Hillary. At least they know who the real enemies of working families are, are willing to call them out and refuse their money. The most important thing to family, (wives, husbands, and children) are economic needs and while Hillary supports just as most democrats do bills to extend welfare more for women and give them their rights over their bodies, she is unwilling to move away from her cozy big money position. She is the favorite of Wall Street. She gets them what they want by maintaining the status quo for the billionaires and throwing some entitlement crumbs to working families to prevent them joining with the rest of the poor and staging a political uprising. The men on the other hand, do not parse their words and cut to the chase. Their positions are well reasoned and authentically held. Hillary is becoming a better performing more attractive, more polished actor but we all know now who call the shots and the billionaires sure are not supporting her for her ability to put a larger share of the pie in the hands of working people.
When we know the truth about the goals of her billionaire donors, her unwillingness to cal them out an d her willingness to support their priorities ( no -reinstatement of Glass-Steagal, continuing Citizens United, the TPP), she just comes across as insincere and unsupportable.

First, she has made overturning Citizens United a priority of her campaign. Second, Hillary has been fighting for women and children since the 70's, not just in America, but on a global stage. Third, she is the only candidate who has hired a Wall Street watchdog into her campaign, as well as nobel economists Stiglitz and Blinder. Fourth, she has been calling for more Wall Street regulation since 2005.

Eta: she even has a 100% rating for protecting Social Security and Medicare.

because all they comprehend is money and power. Sec. Clinton has more money and power than anyone else in our party, therefore they worry about her the most.

To assume there is any other reason they focus on her is delusional.