2016 Postmortem

Johnny2X2X

(19,066 posts) Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:13 AM Jan 2012

How Obama knows he won

Well, among other things this:

FOX NEWS calling him out for the auto bailouts, saying, well actually those were begun under Bush, Obama just followed through on Bush's plan.

LOL...Say what? The auto bailouts were a pariah on the Right for 3 years and they attempted to hang it around the neck of the President, only they worked very well and Obama deserves all the credit for continuing them when Bush was ready to pull the plug on them all together. Bush gets some credit for starting them, but without Obama's resolve the auto industry would have perished. But, regardless, how in the Hell does FOX get off saying anything about the Auto Bailouts that they railed against every single day for 2 years? That's it? That's their criticism? Amazing.

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Obama knows he won (Original Post) Johnny2X2X Jan 2012 OP

Obama's bailout started during the bu$h regime? liberal N proud Jan 2012 #1

Exactly Johnny2X2X Jan 2012 #2

liberal N proud

(60,335 posts)

1. Obama's bailout started during the bu$h regime?

Reply to Johnny2X2X (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:17 AM

Jan 2012

That is either one amazing feat getting that sort of action done before taking office, or FUX news has had it wrong for the last three years.

As usual the pukes want it both ways.

Johnny2X2X

(19,066 posts)

2. Exactly

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:26 AM

Jan 2012

He gave a solid and very factual speech that has Republicans scrambling and reevaluating their options even as we sit here tonight.

I would say game changer, but the game has already been changed, this was just a slap in the face of any and all Republicans across the country that Obama is a strong President who will be very very tough to beat on November. You could see it written across the faces of the Republicans in the crowd, a big collective , "UH OH!!!, wow, we really overplayed our hand horribly."

Reply to this discussion