Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is mitt scraping the bottom of the barrel for a running mate? (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Jul 2012 OP
She probably just wanted to save face Rosanna Lopez Jul 2012 #1
Are you kidding me! Her husband is a classic rufus dog Jul 2012 #8
Bachmann does not deny she is being vetted! DJ13 Jul 2012 #2
Perhaps. Sinistrous Jul 2012 #3
He is looking for a Republican SoutherDem Jul 2012 #4
Relax, Michele.... Wounded Bear Jul 2012 #5
His running mate will be Romm Mitney Marsala Jul 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author kysrsoze Jul 2012 #7
It's All About His Hair... triplepoint Jul 2012 #9
He couldn't be scraping the bottom of the barrel... Punkingal Jul 2012 #10
Normally I'd call this a "dangle," but.... sofa king Jul 2012 #11
Not likely to be Huntsman. TexasTowelie Jul 2012 #18
I'm thinking the LDS has another objective: legitimacy. sofa king Jul 2012 #20
Oh, I thought this was going to be about Sarah Palin. tanyev Jul 2012 #12
Didn't they already scrape the bottom of the barrel to get Romney? FSogol Jul 2012 #13
She's not being vetted. She just can't allow her ego to say she isn't. WI_DEM Jul 2012 #14
It's not a very high barrel, it's all bottom. nt bemildred Jul 2012 #15
The barrel is a septic tank. There's a lot of shit in it to sift through. HopeHoops Jul 2012 #16
Forget about Bachmann LiberalFighter Jul 2012 #17
How could he not scrape the bottom of the barrel? GoCubsGo Jul 2012 #19
I'm pulling for Alan West Generic Brad Jul 2012 #21
Since that's where he came from, mzteris Jul 2012 #22
Christine O’Donnell is chumming, down in that barrel, somewhere, and looking for a gig Brother Buzz Jul 2012 #23
He knows there's no turning back cbrer Jul 2012 #24

Rosanna Lopez

(308 posts)
1. She probably just wanted to save face
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 12:27 AM
Jul 2012

I just saw that interview on Piers Morgan and I'm not sure if we should read too much into it.

Romney obviously won't pick someone as unqualified as Bachmann, and who even Republicans don't like (she finished 5th in Iowa).

She has a few screws loose and would turn away Independents the way Palin did. (and Bachmann also has some vulnerabilities when it comes to her spouse, but that's another topic).

Sinistrous

(4,249 posts)
3. Perhaps.
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 12:31 AM
Jul 2012

Last time, the GOP broke through the bottom of the barrel and made their pick from among the worms living in the muck underneath.

Response to yortsed snacilbuper (Original post)

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
11. Normally I'd call this a "dangle," but....
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 07:44 AM
Jul 2012

In the slow news months of summer in a general election year, the press invariably begins speculating on who the VP nominee will be, which has the potential to deflate the announcement if they guess right.

So to distract the press, the campaign dangles red herrings for the press to bat around. Usually, the "dangles" are more of something than the presumptive nominee wishes to actually have--too conservative, too liberal... too goddamned crazy. The dangle is supposed to present the candidate as open-minded and mindful of the minority party interests.

But now I'm not so sure. In another post I pointed out that there are numerous entities which can claim to have a say in Romney's pick for VP: Romney himself, the Mormon Church, the billionaires who bought his campaign (perhaps each one individually), knuckle-dragging teabaggers, and Ron Paul.

Some of those entities, I think, will outright refuse any female candidate, any person of color, and anyone with the last name of "Paul." So my usual guess is that the vetting of Bachmann is a "dangle" which may actually be tipping us off to the fact that a female will not actually be seriously considered.

Personally, I think Jon Huntsman is the only guy they can settle on, but it's a guess of elimination based on no actual evidence except Huntsman's total silence. So don't bet real money on him.

But here's the thing: I've never seen a candidate go completely underwater before the convention like Romney has--McCain was close, but nothing like this. So he has to do something different and Romney may realize it. He's not particularly creative, either, so "doing a Palin" may be an actual, totally idiotic, plan.



TexasTowelie

(112,489 posts)
18. Not likely to be Huntsman.
Wed Jul 4, 2012, 07:58 AM
Jul 2012

Having two Mormons on the ticket would have a negative impact in southern states.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
20. I'm thinking the LDS has another objective: legitimacy.
Wed Jul 4, 2012, 11:55 AM
Jul 2012

I don't think anything legal can reverse the obvious course of this election now, and I think that the realists within the Mormon Church--wait a minute, scratch that.

I think that if there are realists within the Mormon Church, they see an opportunity to make hay by running a credible campaign, even if it loses. They win something if they can show the trogs that their interests largely overlap. All cults strive for acceptance once they reach a certain size. That is worth more to them than merely getting their man inside for four years.

I further think the LDS is the group with the largest sway in the internal nomination power struggle, because they have the money, the influence, and all the goods on both Romney and Huntsman, so they have a very powerful veto threat to make, if necessary.

Huntsman, as I've said, may be the only candidate all of those interests can agree upon. He's the one with the strongest backing from the potentially most influential deciding force, and perhaps the least unfavorability among the others.

FSogol

(45,532 posts)
13. Didn't they already scrape the bottom of the barrel to get Romney?
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 09:00 AM
Jul 2012

Still think he'll pick VA Gov, Bob McDonnell.

LiberalFighter

(51,137 posts)
17. Forget about Bachmann
Tue Jul 3, 2012, 10:19 AM
Jul 2012

If he is even considering Jingles as the media is suggesting then yes he is considering underneath the bottom of the barrel. No different then looking underneath the bottom of a rock and seeing all of the slugs.

Generic Brad

(14,276 posts)
21. I'm pulling for Alan West
Wed Jul 4, 2012, 12:04 PM
Jul 2012

But Michelle Bachmann would be a close second. Either one guarantees an Obama victory.

Brother Buzz

(36,478 posts)
23. Christine O’Donnell is chumming, down in that barrel, somewhere, and looking for a gig
Wed Jul 4, 2012, 01:11 PM
Jul 2012

And she's not a witch

SO STOP SAYING THAT!

 

cbrer

(1,831 posts)
24. He knows there's no turning back
Wed Jul 4, 2012, 04:24 PM
Jul 2012

Once he calls a running mate. And without wanting to sound like a hack, he's basically a coward who hides behind plenty of fronts. Watch him when he's addressing an audience. He doesn't like the proles.

So he'll delay. With any luck, the decision will be too much for him, and his brain will explode.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is mitt scraping the bott...