Any Democrat who wants to be elected has to deal with that "whole raising money problem." Unlike the Rethug candidate, ours won't be relying on the Koch brothers and their 1 or 2 billion.

In fact, some of the largest "donors" give to both the Democratic and Republican candidates so as to hedge their bets.

For instance, here's a list of Obama's top donors in 2008: http://www.opensecrets.org/PRES08/contrib.php?cid=N00009638

Here's a list of McCain's top donors in 2008: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=n00006424

So taking only Federal matching funds won't do it.

I was commenting on your Koch brothers comment, as if Democrats don't also get massive sums of money from despicable sources to whom they are then beholden once in office.

Hopefully people will click on the links in my last post, because I think many are flat-out ignorant of that information.

are prepared to donate a billion or so each.

Do the math. It's not the same.

Like I said, I hope you and others will click on the links in my previous post. People seem quite ignorant of the fact that Dems get massive sums from the likes of Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, General Electric, Monsanto, George Soros, and so on. Your last reply is exhibit A.

As much as you may want to believe, it ain't all small donations from mom and pop. Sorry to burst that bubble.

Money can buy, and like a good politician she stays bought!
I'll take the revolution thanks....

.... one of those fantasy video games? (Maybe set in a post apocalyptic future.)

But only a typo.

One of so many examples of why this campaign is so much like Ron Paul's.. even if the candidates themself are significantly different.

The Ron Paul Revolution..
The Bernie Sanders Revolution..

'And then they make fun of you'
thanks

Sorry. Are we allowed to believe that spending hundreds of millions of dollars that were raised from billionaires and oligarchs is not our idea of a "president of the people"?

had made an anti-Bernie film, then surely SCOTUS would have ruled against them.

They would know how authentic he is and would naturally see that money isn't speech.

Because it was a Hillary Lannister film, then what was the harm really?

Maybe she wants to win in November of 2016

nauseatingly aware

I'd post a picture but I'm on my phone.