2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumO’Malley Not Backing Down on Call for More Democratic Debates
Matt Sheaff ?@MattSheaff@nhprs @psutherlandNHPR reports that @MartinOMalley Not Backing Down On Call for More Debates #nhpolitics http://nhpr.org/post/o-malley-not-backing-down-call-more-debates
Since the Democratic National Committee announced last month its schedule of six debates before the presidential primaries and only one in each of the early voting states, Martin OMalley has made it his mission to change that.
So far, he's had little luck. But it's not for lack of trying. Over the past few weeks, O'Malley's campaign has blasted out emails to supporters, reached out to prominent Democratic leaders and even created the Twitter hashtag #WeNeedDebate urging the DNC to add more debates on the schedule. OMalleys team is also pushing for the DNC to rescind proposed sanctions against candidates who participate in any non-DNC debates.
While other Democrats have grumbled about the DNC's schedule, OMalley has been the most outspoken on the issue. He told the crowd at a DNC conference earlier last month that the current schedule is bad for the country and its political malpractice for our party." O'Malley allies have accused the DNC of limiting debates to aid fellow candidate Hillary Clinton...
There are signs that the discontent with the schedule is rising. This week Democratic National Committee vice chairs R.T. Rybak and Tulsi Gabbard pushed for more debates in a Facebook post, saying having only six debates is a "mistake." And on September 16, OMalley will be taking his fight to the streets by organizing a protest outside DNC headquarters in Washington, D.C.
So far, NH1 News in Concord has organized what will be New Hampshire's second Democratic debate on February 3. OMalley eagerly accepted.
Matt Sheaff ?@MattSheaff
@MartinOMalley Calls on Candidates to Accept NH1 Invitation & Make It a Debate #nhpolitics
elleng
(130,956 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I just need them sooner.
askew
(1,464 posts)Though the way the polls are going for Hillary, she is going to be begging for a debate soon.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I have the feeling DWS and O'M have entered into that phase. Seems each knows to give in is worse the worst thing.
It's become a matter that reaches into something deep and central to both politicians.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...she's losing support for hers.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)She's missed opportunities four by my count if you separate the questions of more debates and the exclusivity agreement.
People who get that far down the road are in a position where now there must be some sort of apology, that's a threat, and it's likely she sees OMalley's insistence as the cause. That just adds hurdles for her to get over or around, seems very unlikely.
For his part OMalley see's it as existential to his campaign, and he see's DWS as the obstacle. Seems very unlikely he'll give in...
So it's seems its going to be a head bashing
Left Coast2020
(2,397 posts)Hopefully the kitchen will get too hot for her.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)dws et al are not even trying anymore....they know it is obvious shielding and don't care.
i do not see how this can stand
not to mention they are letting the gop run amok with the national stage and don't care about that either.
frylock
(34,825 posts)this issue has really been moved to the front burner this week, and Debbie Waterboy is definitely feeling the heat.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)...is powerless to do jack shit about it.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)If she declines, she can stand on an empty stage at the official DNC debate with low viewership and think about how her good friend Wasserman-Schultz hooked her up.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)The problem is that Webb and Chaffee are just fine with the debates as they are. I suspect they are stalking horses for the Veep position ready to fill whatever demographic, special interest, or geographic region that Hillary most wants to shore up support for in the general or capture in order to secure the nomination if things get dicey.
But yeah, I would love an AFL/CIO hosted debate.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)I hope he prevails.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.is hurting HRC, and not helping her.
Limiting the debates, more than in any other primary cycle, is just fueling the narrative that Hillary and the machine are not to be trusted.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)They want candidates like O'Malley and Sanders to seem unfamiliar to many voters when the primaries roll around -- especially if those voters agree with the positions of said candidates (otherwise, there is no point in limiting their public exposure).
elleng
(130,956 posts)The party is screwing us.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I hope he keeps pressing the issue.