But I'm afraid this is a trap. Participate and DWS sees to it the DNC ignores you and passively acts against you, don't and suffer only the exposure they allow while in either case they support primarily their (not our) favorite.
It's nice when your friends are in charge of the store.

He could have agreed to separate debates long ago, but he's more interested in debating Clinton than the rest of the field. He's not going to jeopardize his debates with her in order to interact with the others. Which is a logical position for him to take, as frustrating as it might be to the other candidates.

The old Q&As aren't debates anyway.

Btw, what happened to Webb? Did he drop out while I wasn't looking?

Exactly. I don't know how the exclusionary clause is worded but if something other than a debate is held that would be great way to stick a middle finger in Wasserman's direction and get the exposure all the remaining candidates need.

Are town halls considered 'debates'? What if they had a question and answer without a moderator - would still be called a debate?

I hope someone other than you and I on the campaign teams are looking into this.

seems to me that he does not share enough with the three I suggested