Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,766 posts)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 10:53 PM Jul 2012

"The Nakedness of Their Greed" by Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post

The Nakedness of Their Greed

by Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/-the-nakedness-of-their-g_b_1708459.html

"SNIP...............................

Okay. So we know that the entire "stimulus spending through the tax code" argument is a phony, a fake, a rhetorical dodge that's an insult to voters' intelligence. We also know that justification for it has repeatedly been disproven, in the most ruthless and accurate court of economic judgment known to humanity: reality.

You don't neede a lot of econometric modeling to prove it, either All it takes is one simple question: We've had these cuts for ten years, so where are the jobs?

Joshua Picker notes that "during the economic cycle that began in March 2001 and ended in December of 2007 --which almost exactly coincides with the Bush presidency and the implementation of the Bush tax cuts ... registered the weakest jobs and income growth in the post-war period."

Tax cuts on the wealthy didn't create any jobs -- not before the financial crisis brought on by deregulation, and certainly not since. The Republicans, like the Democrats, are proposing "stimulus spending through the tax code." They're just proposing the kind that doesn't work.

..................................SNIP"
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The Nakedness of Their Greed" by Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2012 OP
What about the average $3000 going to families? Did that create no jobs also? dkf Jul 2012 #1
It creates jobs if the families spend it... polichick Jul 2012 #2
So did George Bush's tax breaks work or not? dkf Jul 2012 #3
Bush's tax breaks weren't meant to create jobs... polichick Jul 2012 #4
Ezra subbing for Rachel 90-percent Jul 2012 #5
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
1. What about the average $3000 going to families? Did that create no jobs also?
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 12:17 AM
Jul 2012

And if they didn't work why not rescind them all?

polichick

(37,152 posts)
4. Bush's tax breaks weren't meant to create jobs...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 10:59 AM
Jul 2012

They were meant to redistribute wealth - so yes, they "worked" as planned.

Had the breaks gone only to the middle class and poor, they would have had some impact on jobs without bleeding the country dry.

Obviously.

90-percent

(6,829 posts)
5. Ezra subbing for Rachel
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 11:35 AM
Jul 2012

was all over this later in the week. some nyt reporter nutshelled it with a lot of graphs about job creation and general prosperity for the last 50 years and the GWB years were abysmal by most measures of what shared prosperity should be. blows up the republicans are good for the economy myths.

good stuff. i hope somebody finds and posts.

-90% Jimmy

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"The Nakedness of Th...