Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"The Nakedness of Their Greed" by Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post
The Nakedness of Their Greedby Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/-the-nakedness-of-their-g_b_1708459.html
"SNIP...............................
Okay. So we know that the entire "stimulus spending through the tax code" argument is a phony, a fake, a rhetorical dodge that's an insult to voters' intelligence. We also know that justification for it has repeatedly been disproven, in the most ruthless and accurate court of economic judgment known to humanity: reality.
You don't neede a lot of econometric modeling to prove it, either All it takes is one simple question: We've had these cuts for ten years, so where are the jobs?
Joshua Picker notes that "during the economic cycle that began in March 2001 and ended in December of 2007 --which almost exactly coincides with the Bush presidency and the implementation of the Bush tax cuts ... registered the weakest jobs and income growth in the post-war period."
Tax cuts on the wealthy didn't create any jobs -- not before the financial crisis brought on by deregulation, and certainly not since. The Republicans, like the Democrats, are proposing "stimulus spending through the tax code." They're just proposing the kind that doesn't work.
..................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2024 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The Nakedness of Their Greed" by Richard Eskow at the Huffington Post (Original Post)
applegrove
Jul 2012
OP
dkf
(37,305 posts)1. What about the average $3000 going to families? Did that create no jobs also?
And if they didn't work why not rescind them all?
polichick
(37,152 posts)2. It creates jobs if the families spend it...
...which middle class families tend to do.
dkf
(37,305 posts)3. So did George Bush's tax breaks work or not?
polichick
(37,152 posts)4. Bush's tax breaks weren't meant to create jobs...
They were meant to redistribute wealth - so yes, they "worked" as planned.
Had the breaks gone only to the middle class and poor, they would have had some impact on jobs without bleeding the country dry.
Obviously.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)5. Ezra subbing for Rachel
was all over this later in the week. some nyt reporter nutshelled it with a lot of graphs about job creation and general prosperity for the last 50 years and the GWB years were abysmal by most measures of what shared prosperity should be. blows up the republicans are good for the economy myths.
good stuff. i hope somebody finds and posts.
-90% Jimmy