Cruz supporters should meet with Bernie supporters. Both extremes are willfully ignoring their own inconsistencies.

shouldn't be surprising if you get the same results.

I think Bernies weakest point is foreign policy which he talks about very little.

But I would trust his judgement his morals and his ethics to make the right decision over any other candidate.

I also dont believe that he would lie to start a war or follow the Bush doctrine of aggression. I believe the other candidates would.

But don't call Sanders a hawk. He is far from a hawk. Very far.

using one example of the military action in Kosovo as a 'troubling history of supporting military violence abroad' compared to Clinton and her support for the No Fly Zone of her husband's in the 1990's, her Iraq Vote in the 2000's, her tenure at State where, and I quote, "We came, we saw, he died", her desire for war in Iran, and now breaking with Obama on a No Fly Zone in Syria while the Russians are involved in air attacks?

Sanders has been very reasoned and prudent with his support for any military action over his political career. Clinton on the other hand is a total hawk with a poor sense of judgement and questionable character.

Next!

All bright and shiny and looking like a reasonable hit piece from Arria who is batshit insane if he thinks Hillary is less of a warhawk.

When Sanders opposes war he's a weak pacifist peacenick.

When he supports troops or a military intervention he believes is necessary, he's a warmonger and a hawk.

Gosh, maybe he's -- gasp -- pragmatic and -- double gasp -- a realist.

Hillary has skeletons enough to embarrass a country worth of graveyards. Bernie's skeletons are a drop in an ocean comparatively.

Even taking Hillary out of the picture, Bernie is still better off than the majority of politicians.