Good job dems, and BTW where are the tax returns

The incompetence of Romney's campaign is encouraging, but the amount of money they can raise scares the hell out of me. I think Obama needs to be raising at least 80% of what Romney is.

but I see no evidence that such a thing is true. The fact is that spending more on marketing is not a panacea, and there is a limit to how much marketing can help before it starts doing great harm to the candidate. With advertizing, it is simply not the case that more = better. More often = too much, people tire of it, stop listening, and then begin resenting the candidate. Same stuff applies to all products. Note that many products fail although they are skillfully marketed with large budgets and agencies working hard. If 'more ads' meant more success, why would any 100 million dollar film be allowed to lose money, when another 2 million in ads would bring in billions? The answer is that those ads do not make people do what they don't want to do. You can not sell that which people are not buying simply by nagging at them. It can not be done.

in terms of commercial people start ignoring it and it can even backfire. Romney may get to the point where that's what he has to does because he's so desperate.

Truth is they are more often poison than they are a tonic.

The SuperPACs, however, can raise as much as they want to. That's where the danger is.

Even if it's just for a few months (at least many can gain from the experience for later use).

THANKS!