Why haven't repugs nominated a real lunatic right-winger for president?
I mean, a knuckle-dragging, drooling, eyes rolling around in his head, psycho? This idea of going with a 'moderate' and forcing him to the right for the whole election period is silly. Can't have it both ways. Just get it over with and stop playing pretend. Righties WANT a radical president.
You could see in McCain's face he was really uncomfortable with having Palin forced on him. He was not ok with the crazies trying to turn him into Glenn Beck. His jaw tightened the first time Palin joined him onstage and never unclenched. He never talked about the election afterward, he would just scowl and make a joke when asked about it.
Romney is uncomfortable in his own skin, and he's inept to boot. Unlike McCain, he has no moral compass. He's just really lousy at being a politician.
McCain got to a point where he'd had enough when the older lady (I use the term loosely) took a microphone and said "I don't trust Obama. He's, you know, Arab." McCain summoned the last bit of dignity he had left, grabbed the mic from her and said "NO". That's when I feel he lost the base.
Romney's already lost the base. His campaign is flailing around trying to find ANYONE to vote for him. In a fair fight, he loses. Bad. This is why I think the PACs will go increasingly, horribly negative. It's all they have. That, and voter suppression.
If we're able to contain the voter suppression, Obama wins in a landslide and a bunch of rich, white guys just pissed away the gdp of a third-world country.
= new reply since forum marked as read
"lyin johnny's" dignity, as you call it was a bullshit pr stunt. 
The next winning chess move(s) are almost predictable at this point! 
