Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 02:52 PM Oct 2015

In 2008 Letter, Clinton Camp Suggests Less Debates Might be “Un-American”

http://thebernreport.com/in-2008-letter-clinton-camp-suggests-less-debates-might-be-un-american/

Why aren’t there more debates? Why are we waiting so long? DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz gave the curious explanation that having the candidates out in front of millions of viewers on national TV would harm their campaigns by taking them of the campaign trail. Yeah she said that....

Back in 2008 much was being said about the presidential debates and even though there were more than four times as many in that cycle as there are now, the Clinton camp was adamant about scheduling even more. They recognized the benefit of being in front of the camera. I think we can quickly dismiss any talk that Clinton is not part of the decision making process about the debate schedule for 2016. Back in 2008 when her camp was accusing Obama of avoiding her, Obama was making it clear that he or his camp were involved in approving the debate schedule.

In a 2008 CNN article Clinton called for more debates – “I’m offering Sen. Obama a chance to debate me one-on-one, no moderators. … Just the two of us going for 90 minutes, asking and answering questions; we’ll set whatever rules seem fair,” she said....

Almost everyone wants more debates and to not give them more debates in not Democratic, in fact it’s just the opposite. The DNC has even went so far as to un-invite one of the Vice-Chairs from the debate because she bravely called for more debates on national TV. Read about that HERE
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 2008 Letter, Clinton Camp Suggests Less Debates Might be “Un-American” (Original Post) KamaAina Oct 2015 OP
And she's willing to do more debates in 2015. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #1
O rly? KamaAina Oct 2015 #2
flippety floppety. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
And she really wasn't FOR Biden's disastrous banking reform... Biden made her do it... Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #5
In 2008, 18 debates weren't enough for Hillary so they held 26 and Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #4

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. flippety floppety.
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 03:31 PM
Oct 2015

Slightly OT, Jennifer Granholm, acting as a surrogate, was just on MSNBC to address suggestions of flip flopping, and rolled out an interesting new defense - that Hillary really wasn't ever into the TPP, but was simply saying she was 'for it' because she was working for Obama and he really wanted it. Ie, the old, 'I was only following orders' defense.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
5. And she really wasn't FOR Biden's disastrous banking reform... Biden made her do it...
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 03:46 PM
Oct 2015

And she really wasn't FOR NAFTA, her husband made her do it.

Uncle Joe

(58,389 posts)
4. In 2008, 18 debates weren't enough for Hillary so they held 26 and
Tue Oct 13, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

the Democrats won the White House.


Thanks for the thread, KamaAina

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»In 2008 Letter, Clinton C...