Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIn 2008 Letter, Clinton Camp Suggests Less Debates Might be “Un-American”
http://thebernreport.com/in-2008-letter-clinton-camp-suggests-less-debates-might-be-un-american/Why arent there more debates? Why are we waiting so long? DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz gave the curious explanation that having the candidates out in front of millions of viewers on national TV would harm their campaigns by taking them of the campaign trail. Yeah she said that....
Back in 2008 much was being said about the presidential debates and even though there were more than four times as many in that cycle as there are now, the Clinton camp was adamant about scheduling even more. They recognized the benefit of being in front of the camera. I think we can quickly dismiss any talk that Clinton is not part of the decision making process about the debate schedule for 2016. Back in 2008 when her camp was accusing Obama of avoiding her, Obama was making it clear that he or his camp were involved in approving the debate schedule.
In a 2008 CNN article Clinton called for more debates Im offering Sen. Obama a chance to debate me one-on-one, no moderators. Just the two of us going for 90 minutes, asking and answering questions; well set whatever rules seem fair, she said....
Almost everyone wants more debates and to not give them more debates in not Democratic, in fact its just the opposite. The DNC has even went so far as to un-invite one of the Vice-Chairs from the debate because she bravely called for more debates on national TV. Read about that HERE
Back in 2008 much was being said about the presidential debates and even though there were more than four times as many in that cycle as there are now, the Clinton camp was adamant about scheduling even more. They recognized the benefit of being in front of the camera. I think we can quickly dismiss any talk that Clinton is not part of the decision making process about the debate schedule for 2016. Back in 2008 when her camp was accusing Obama of avoiding her, Obama was making it clear that he or his camp were involved in approving the debate schedule.
In a 2008 CNN article Clinton called for more debates Im offering Sen. Obama a chance to debate me one-on-one, no moderators. Just the two of us going for 90 minutes, asking and answering questions; well set whatever rules seem fair, she said....
Almost everyone wants more debates and to not give them more debates in not Democratic, in fact its just the opposite. The DNC has even went so far as to un-invite one of the Vice-Chairs from the debate because she bravely called for more debates on national TV. Read about that HERE
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 501 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 2008 Letter, Clinton Camp Suggests Less Debates Might be “Un-American” (Original Post)
KamaAina
Oct 2015
OP
And she really wasn't FOR Biden's disastrous banking reform... Biden made her do it...
Luminous Animal
Oct 2015
#5
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)1. And she's willing to do more debates in 2015.
So DWS is the obstacle and is going against HRC's wishes?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)3. flippety floppety.
Slightly OT, Jennifer Granholm, acting as a surrogate, was just on MSNBC to address suggestions of flip flopping, and rolled out an interesting new defense - that Hillary really wasn't ever into the TPP, but was simply saying she was 'for it' because she was working for Obama and he really wanted it. Ie, the old, 'I was only following orders' defense.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)5. And she really wasn't FOR Biden's disastrous banking reform... Biden made her do it...
And she really wasn't FOR NAFTA, her husband made her do it.
Uncle Joe
(58,389 posts)4. In 2008, 18 debates weren't enough for Hillary so they held 26 and
the Democrats won the White House.
Thanks for the thread, KamaAina