2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumInvestigation: election day fraud “virtually nonexistent”
Investigation: election day fraud virtually nonexistent
A new nationwide analysis of more than 2,000 cases of alleged election fraud over the last dozen years shows that in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which has prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tougher voter-ID laws, was virtually nonexistent.
The analysis of 2,068 reported fraud cases by News21, a Carnegie-Knight investigative reporting project, found 10 cases of alleged in-person voter impersonation since 2000.
With 146 million registered voters in the United States, those represent about one for every 15 million prospective voters.
The News21 report is based on a national public-records search in which reporters sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of alleged fraudulent activity - including registration fraud; absentee-ballot fraud; vote buying; false election counts; campaign fraud; the casting of ballots by ineligible voters, such as felons and non-citizens; double voting; and voter impersonation.
The analysis found that there is more alleged fraud in absentee ballots and voter registration than in any of the other categories. The analysis shows 491 cases of alleged absentee ballot fraud and 400 cases involving registration fraud. Requiring voters to show identification at the polls - the crux of most of the new legislation - would not have prevented those cases.The analysis also found that more than 46 percent of the reported election fraud allegations resulted in acquittals, dropped charges or decisions not to bring charges.
In many cases, people simply made mistakes. Felons or non-citizens sometimes registered to vote or cast votes because they were confused about their eligibility. Some voters accidentally cast their ballots twice or went to the wrong precinct. And election officials made mistakes, such as clerical errors - giving voters ballots when they have already voted - and errors due to confusion about eligibility.
enough
(13,262 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Keep focused, keep focused, on the biggest problem of all, that we no longer get to count the votes.
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)But isn't the article referring to voter, and not election, fraud? Are those damn diebold machines (and sequoia) going to be used?
I'll never forget what happened in 2004, where exit polls showed Kerry in the lead when suddenly those numbers 'flipped.' That had never happened before in the history of exit polling. I believe Kerry won but, as in the 2000 election, the repukes were busy in the background, undermining the process, so that junior could scrape by. By 2004, they had it down to a science and (tho' junior had lousy poll numbers) what do you know, the election was stolen...again. I'll never forget the helplessness/hopelessness I felt. Like a major kick in the gut.
I don't want that to ever happen again.