Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders Has a Secret Weapon, and the Media Elites Just Don’t Get It
Yep, funny that's what all us Bernie supporters have been saying.
Those damn kids and their tweeter machine!
Ho hum.
Bernie Sanders Has a Secret Weapon, and the Media Elites Just Dont Get It
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-has-a-secret-weapon-and-the-media-elites-just-dont-get-it/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Bernie Sanderss secret weapon is hiding in plain sight. It was there for everyone to see throughout the Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night, but we arent hearing about it in the post-debate coverage. Apparently it is invisible to the TV talking heads, headline writers, pundits, campaign reporters, and other media types who decide these things.
The media elites are fixated on a single question only: Who won? The American medias tendency to cover politics like a sporting event dates back decades, of course, but it seems to grow more entrenched and absurd with each passing election. Thus the presidential election is covered like a horse race, presidential debates like boxing matches. Who landed the best punches? Who avoided them? Hence most news stories after Tuesday nights debate carried headlines along the lines of Hillary Triumphs After Attacking Sanderss Gun Record.
What actual voters think about Tuesdays debate, however, might be quite different. Michael Tomasky, the political columnist at the Daily Beast, seems to be the only mainstream commentator who broke from the herd to make this point. Citing the results of two separate focus groups whose opinions had not been influenced by the medias post-mortem declarations, Tomasky wrote, Theres reason to believe that people watching at home didnt share the medias overwhelming verdict that Clinton crushed it. On the contrary, both focus groups thought Sanders had won.
Leaving aside the simplistic focus on who won or lost, Sanders clearly appealed to many people Tuesday night, and his secret weapon helps explain why. That secret weapon is the gift of plain speech. This gift is less about the content of Sanderss remarks, though that matters, than it is about the way he delivers themhe uses the kind of language ordinary people use themselves and speaks with a passion that makes it clear he genuinely believes what hes saying.
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-has-a-secret-weapon-and-the-media-elites-just-dont-get-it/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Bernie Sanderss secret weapon is hiding in plain sight. It was there for everyone to see throughout the Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night, but we arent hearing about it in the post-debate coverage. Apparently it is invisible to the TV talking heads, headline writers, pundits, campaign reporters, and other media types who decide these things.
The media elites are fixated on a single question only: Who won? The American medias tendency to cover politics like a sporting event dates back decades, of course, but it seems to grow more entrenched and absurd with each passing election. Thus the presidential election is covered like a horse race, presidential debates like boxing matches. Who landed the best punches? Who avoided them? Hence most news stories after Tuesday nights debate carried headlines along the lines of Hillary Triumphs After Attacking Sanderss Gun Record.
What actual voters think about Tuesdays debate, however, might be quite different. Michael Tomasky, the political columnist at the Daily Beast, seems to be the only mainstream commentator who broke from the herd to make this point. Citing the results of two separate focus groups whose opinions had not been influenced by the medias post-mortem declarations, Tomasky wrote, Theres reason to believe that people watching at home didnt share the medias overwhelming verdict that Clinton crushed it. On the contrary, both focus groups thought Sanders had won.
Leaving aside the simplistic focus on who won or lost, Sanders clearly appealed to many people Tuesday night, and his secret weapon helps explain why. That secret weapon is the gift of plain speech. This gift is less about the content of Sanderss remarks, though that matters, than it is about the way he delivers themhe uses the kind of language ordinary people use themselves and speaks with a passion that makes it clear he genuinely believes what hes saying.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 587 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders Has a Secret Weapon, and the Media Elites Just Don’t Get It (Original Post)
pinebox
Oct 2015
OP
marym625
(17,997 posts)1. Those damn kids and their tweeter machines
kath
(10,565 posts)2. "The gift of plain speech" - YES. Yes yes yes.