Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Lessig is not a good communicator. He's irritating. Even when he is saying things that you agree
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 09:43 PM
Oct 2015

with, his demeanor is off-putting and wonkish. He makes Sanders, with his authentic rough edges, seem suave by comparison.

Lessig wasn't included because his base consists of his immediate relatives. He makes Chaffee look like a comer.

He also has promised to IMMEDIATELY resign if he can magically "cure corruption" as POTUS. It's just a stupid campaign. I don't think most Americans want to vote for a one-issue guy who promises to quit.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
3. Lessig is a rank opportunist, trying to sell a recently-released book, using the election to do so
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 09:51 PM
Oct 2015

He knows Bernie is already very strongly against CU and for comprehensive
campaign finance reform. .. just like he is.

To make things worse, he actually knows Bernie personally, yet pulled away
from his campaign to declare his own ONE-ISSUE candidacy..

Him being excluded is one of the very few things DWS has ever done that I
agree with.

brooklynite

(94,670 posts)
4. Lessig is polling <1% (yes, he's actually being polled)
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 10:19 PM
Oct 2015

Which other <1% candidates (80+) would you allow in?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I read in another thread