In a previous post I elaborated on the genesis for this consternation and it resulted in a unjust hide so in a bow to discretion I will not do so again.

2008 and 2016.

Comparing the Vermont senator to Barack Obama is analogous to comparing Richard Dunn to Muhammad Ali because they both were boxers.

I think we need to see more of this! Come on DNC let's add 3 or 4 more debates!

Hillary has a lot to say about the issues and Bernie seems happy to shout out his stump speech in the answer to any question!

Bernie people want it and I think the Democratic Party should be nice to it's guest and give Bernie more time behind the podium!

Obama won race and is In white house

maybe with all the flip-floping she will forget she ran in 2008

I have no preference expressed in this Democratic primary here. But this post is utter bullshit.

Which candidate won the Democratic debate is irrelevant, unless one measures things by media metrics, which are decidedly not objective.

These debates are not to decide winners/losers, but to highlight the differences between candidates. No, it is not a perfect mechanism, but it is what it is.

Contrasting the GOP (so-called) debates the only decision one can make here is that any of the Democratic candidates are orders of magnitude above the GOP.

Yes! I have a preference for the 2016 presidential election. But I would prefer not to reveal it within these forums. Such is the toxic nature of such things. I would prefer not to plunge myself into that vat of necrotizing fasciitis.

I will support and vote for whoever the Democratic Party nominates.

Those claiming that Hillary or Bernie won the debate are full of shit!