Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 05:26 AM Aug 2012

Will Romney's non-disclosure of income tax returns decide the election ?

I think so. What do you think ?

See this thread for Lawrence O'Donnell's take: http://www.democraticunderground.com/101749044


9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
4 (44%)
No
2 (22%)
I am unsure of the effect so far
0 (0%)
Other (see my post)
3 (33%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Romney's non-disclosure of income tax returns decide the election ? (Original Post) steve2470 Aug 2012 OP
It's not the crime, it's the cover-up. nt DCKit Aug 2012 #1
+1 nt steve2470 Aug 2012 #2
Only in part quaker bill Aug 2012 #3
Ann's "you people" response had to hurt her husband's campaign a little bit Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2012 #8
No, of course not! RevStPatrick Aug 2012 #4
I guess I was looking at it from a Democratic "political junkie" viewpoint steve2470 Aug 2012 #5
We live in a bubble, we Democratic political junkies... RevStPatrick Aug 2012 #6
YES, its up to us though to NOT LET UP on this ever Tribetime Aug 2012 #7
I think it already has. rocktivity Aug 2012 #9

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
3. Only in part
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 07:27 AM
Aug 2012

The issue itself will not decide the election. However this response and many others will add to a negative image of character / likability that will decide it. The whole "we are above your scrutiny and don't have to answer your little questions" thing will do them in.

I do not know what is in the returns, so it could be that the Romneys are making the best move available. If they did not pay income taxes in some of those years while pulling down a king's ransom sheltered in overseas accounts, releasing the info could make it even worse. But it is not good or going to get better as it is.

It is very likely that they have no better choices, because if they did, they would have taken another option by now. So if the choice is between seeming secretive and imperious, or seeming like a tax manipulator / deadbeat, they choose imperious. One could potentially survive imperious in some elections, but this is the wrong election for that, the people are kind of over rich people having all the advantages at the moment, so they won't get past this.

It is important to consider that in these races, it is almost always image over substance, (unless the substance is really, really ugly).

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,437 posts)
8. Ann's "you people" response had to hurt her husband's campaign a little bit
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 11:41 AM
Aug 2012

Not to mention the hypocrisy of his demands during past campaigns for releasing tax records and then implying that there's questionable stuff in them.

Enough to decide the election? No. But definitely enough to leave a bad taste in our mouths that will (hopefully) linger through Election Day.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
4. No, of course not!
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:26 AM
Aug 2012

There are so many other reasons why the man and his running mate are total douche-nozzles. This is just one of many reasons why they won't win. The vast majority of voters won't know or care that he didn't release his taxes.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
5. I guess I was looking at it from a Democratic "political junkie" viewpoint
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 08:29 AM
Aug 2012

It is one of many reasons, yes.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
6. We live in a bubble, we Democratic political junkies...
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 11:10 AM
Aug 2012

I like it in my bubble, but most people don't live here.

Of course, there are people who live in the opposite bubble. Actually, there are lots of different bubbles.

I had a conversation recently with someone who, although he doesn't even know Mr. Obama's opponent's name, was convinced that Mr. Obama is going to lose in the biggest landslide since 1984 Reagan. All because someone told him that they had heard it from a friend who got that from the TV machine.

When I laughed and laughed and laughed, he thought I must have lost my mind. I asked him if he wanted me show him how the latest polls, including the Fox News poll, had Mr. Obama ahead by several points. He said "they take polls about these things before the elections?"

Now there's a bubble that I try to stay away from.

Tribetime

(4,702 posts)
7. YES, its up to us though to NOT LET UP on this ever
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 11:21 AM
Aug 2012

We must hound him non stop just like they did about the birth certificate. WE CANNOT LET THIS DIE OUT. No one should be even close to holding office who snubs his nose at paying taxes....LET ALONE BE PRESIDENT.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
9. I think it already has.
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 12:30 PM
Aug 2012

Last edited Thu Apr 10, 2014, 12:56 PM - Edit history (2)



Between refusing to show his income tax returns and choosing a running mate with even less of a business background than Obama, Romney's sway with independent voters (the only true weapon he had against Obama) is deteriorating irreversibly.


rocktivity
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Will Romney's non-disclos...