Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMrs. Clinton said she wants to increase benefits to the poorest, most vulnerable recipients
Hillary Clinton Backs Use of Death PenaltyLAURA MECKLER
Wall Street Journal
Mrs. Clinton also broke from many liberals, including Mr. Sanders, in discussing the future of Social Security. The left wants to expand benefits for most or all recipients. Mrs. Clinton said Wednesday she wants to increase benefits to the poorest, most vulnerable recipientsbut she stopped well short of endorsing an across-the-board benefit boost. She also didnt rule out other benefit cuts.
She also laid out her views on the future of Social Security in more detail than she has in the past, and what she didnt say was as important as what she did say. Mrs. Clinton spoke of increasing benefits for the poorest retirees, but said nothing about more benefits for others.
I am concerned about those people on Social Security who are most vulnerable in terms of what their monthly pay out isthat is primarily divorced, widowed, single women who either never worked themselves or worked only a little bit so they have either just their own earnings to depend on, or they have a spouse who was also a low-wage worker, she said. The first and most important task, I think, is we make sure that we get the monthly payment for the poorest Social Security recipients up.
The program faces a long-term funding gap, and for many years, there was a rough consensus that the solution would ultimately involve both tax increases and benefit reductions to bring the program into balance. But many on the left have united to oppose any cuts to benefits and to back across-the-board benefit increases, funding them with tax increases on upper-income workers.
Mrs. Clinton said she wouldnt rule out raising the retirement age for people whose jobs allow them to work later in life, if that were possible, though she said she didnt favor this.
She also laid out her views on the future of Social Security in more detail than she has in the past, and what she didnt say was as important as what she did say. Mrs. Clinton spoke of increasing benefits for the poorest retirees, but said nothing about more benefits for others.
I am concerned about those people on Social Security who are most vulnerable in terms of what their monthly pay out isthat is primarily divorced, widowed, single women who either never worked themselves or worked only a little bit so they have either just their own earnings to depend on, or they have a spouse who was also a low-wage worker, she said. The first and most important task, I think, is we make sure that we get the monthly payment for the poorest Social Security recipients up.
The program faces a long-term funding gap, and for many years, there was a rough consensus that the solution would ultimately involve both tax increases and benefit reductions to bring the program into balance. But many on the left have united to oppose any cuts to benefits and to back across-the-board benefit increases, funding them with tax increases on upper-income workers.
Mrs. Clinton said she wouldnt rule out raising the retirement age for people whose jobs allow them to work later in life, if that were possible, though she said she didnt favor this.
Related:
Say It Ain't So, Hillary Clinton - You're Open to the Idea of Raising the Retirement Age?
Clinton did not categorically rule out Social Security benefit cuts or raising the retirement age
Clinton's Remarkable Non-Answer Regarding Social Security (Sep 24, 2015)
Hillary Clinton on Social Security Expansion: Words are Wind. A Cold Wind.
Sanders offers Social Security as latest example of many, many differences with Clinton
A Trojan Horse In Clintons Pledge To Enhance Social Security?
Why It's Misleading to Swear to Protect the Poor's Social-Security Benefits
Hillary Clinton's lack of answers regarding Social Security (September 26, 2007)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 670 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mrs. Clinton said she wants to increase benefits to the poorest, most vulnerable recipients (Original Post)
portlander23
Nov 2015
OP
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)1. That appears to be what she said... wait for it to change...
... when she find out the rest of us think that is an unwise decision.
My, my, my.... It's tough when you have to keep waiting for the poll to inform you on an idea that would otherwise come from background and experience... and caring for the future of this country.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)5. Trust fail.
Either you do or you don't.
Either you will or you won't.
One never knows with a shapeshifter and that's what I find the most disturbing.
Trust? There is no trust. How can there be?
Autumn
(45,114 posts)2. Mrs. Clinton says a lot of things. Some of those things she says
are subject to change.
onecaliberal
(32,873 posts)3. This could be means testing which would be really effing terrible.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)4. Your link doesn't match your post
portlander23
(2,078 posts)8. The article discusses the death penalty and other issues
Go to the 4th paragraph.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)6. Triangulation....again.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)7. You can't squeeze blood from a turnip (the poor)
but the middle class... there's a lot they can still plunder there.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)9. That's welfare....Ooops. We don't have that anymore