2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders: Senate votes are what I’m paid to do (Hillary not so much)
Reposted from LBN: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141250322
The consensus of the forum hosts is that there is no specific event that qualifies as LBN. Suggest reposting the article in the GDP forum.
OS
Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during a town hall meeting at William Penn University, Monday, Oct. 19, 2015, in Oskaloosa, Iowa.
CHARLIE NEIBERGALL AP
http://www.kentucky.com/2015/11/03/4120416_sanders-senate-votes-are-what.html?rh=1
BY LESLEY CLARK
lclark@mcclatchydc.comNovember 3, 2015 Updated 2 hours ago
WASHINGTON U.S. senators running for president often miss a lot of Senate votes. (See Marco Rubio for the 2016 version and Barack Obama for the 2008 edition) But theyre not Bernie Sanders.
The Vermont senator has missed just 4 percent of Senate votes, compared to 42 percent for Rubio, MSNBC calculated -- and Sanders says he doesnt like to miss any.
That's kind of what I'm paid to do, Sanders told MSNBCs Andrea Mitchell on Tuesday. He added that he would miss votes, but said I'm trying to miss as few as I possibly can.
I am extraordinarily proud to represent my great state in the Senate, Sanders said. Were working very hard on a number of issues. And while it is difficult and very time-consuming to be a full-time candidate and to be a full-time senator, that is at the moment what I'm trying to do.
FULL story at link.
Bernie misses about 5% while Hillary was at 83.5 The chart below is interactive: http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/11/2/9645384/rubio-missing-votes
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)You are definitely missing something. We call it "the point." Bernie Sanders is not a conventional politician. This is just one small example of the way he differs from other people who run for office. You can dislike him because of that, or for any reason you want, but it's true.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Some like the murkiness.
I like the fact that Bernie can do more than one thing at a time.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Or are you complaining that the chart does not predict the future?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Everyone knows how much time running for President takes. Just look at your chart.
I don't know about you but I want to beat the repubs in November.
If repubs get to nominate the next four Supreme Court Justices you can kiss you future goodby. Meanwhile you play these chicken shit Bernie is better than Hillary games.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Btw, did you think no one noticed the sudden abandonment of your previous argument?
artislife
(9,497 posts)It is called the primaries, that is why we compare the candidates against each other. That is why there are primaries.
840high
(17,196 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)In the final analysis, which is the end of next year, we'll see if the percentages are representative. So far, they state clearly that one handles responsibility over presidential run far better than the other one does.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)onenote
(42,762 posts)Obama missed votes. Kerry missed votes. Most candidates miss votes. The chart that Vox manufactured would look a lot different if instead of starting at 22 months out it started at 24 months out (since Bernie missed 33 percent of the votes in Nov and Dec of 2014). Or one could compare records from the date each candidate declared or for the first X months of their campaigns. Or one could compare the number of votes cast instead of the percentage of votes missed. Bernie would have a better record than Clinton using most, but not all of these metrics. Vox however has chosen to create a really absurd comparison by looking one month (22) votes for Bernie against three months for Clinton. If Vox had wanted to make a more valid comparison they could have compared Clinton's October 2007 record to Bernie's October 2015 record. Bernie wins the comparison but instead of it being 5/83.5 it's more like 5 percent/50 percent.
artislife
(9,497 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)quite a bit by the looks of it.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)For actually giving a crap about your job.