Truth is out, in this article.

Please back up your assertion.

She was discussing why Wall Street would like her, if not for $$. She reminded them that they like her because of the work she did as a Senator. She was there rebuilding after 911. She was their Senator.

To not see the difference between Giuliani's use of it and Clinton's is either disingenuous or ignorant. Just because someone says "911" does not mean they are invoking it. It must be looked at in context. Nuance is lost on people who are either looking for a way to twist for the best attack, or are too stupid to understand it. I gave the article's author the benefit of the doubt.

Like I said, if you are looking for a way to attack her, you can twist anything she says into a negative. I just thought democrats were smarter and more....honest than this.

Ms Clinton is in a bubble.

And she's going to go full Giuliani as soon as she can.

...including the direct attacks she was answering. There was and is a context.

Don't worry, if HRC ever becomes POTUS, Pitt will have plenty of opportunity to take things out of context and blow them out of proportion. I'm sure it will be entertaining -- just not necessarily accurate.

I posted the article in full the other day. He rocked it with this article. Nailed it

That's how I vote for Pitt's pugnacious perspicacity.

if in doubt 9/11 9/11

we are falling for this negative propaganda. At least, some of us are. But they are twisting her into something they imagine she is.

TYT's reaction to the 1%ers use of 9/11...

Did, and was called out on by democrats, would still be called out when a democrat did it.

The families of the victims of 9/11 are pretty pissed at her remarks.

Hillary performed a Full Frontal Giuliani in front of the entire Nation and World.
That is not easy!

companies affect her regulation of them?" ?

It doesn't it is the same verbal salad meant to deflect the discussion.

What is disingenuous or ignorant is to ignore the corrupting influence of money in our government

anything dishonest or ignorant or was corrupt in any way.

Your accusations without facts continue to distort the dedication, and work Clinton has done for us.

Go ahead. Join the RW in trashing her.

But you are wrong.

Do you deny they have given her the money?
Does the question make you uncomfortable?
Why?

Hillary is not one of us and will not be looking out for our best interest and I don't think anyone can even come to the conclusion that she will, honestly that is.

IMO

that is in the 99% can even consider anyone besides Bernie at this point in time.

The man is spot on with his fight for us for his whole political life.

and he's 100%, the most honest one out there.

And that is indeed invoking 911.

See also Reply 8.

she not only invoked 9/11, she led people to believe that it was because how she helped them at that time, that they were giving her money now.

That isn't true.

Iow, she attempted to deceive those who were watching the debate because she KNOWS that a top issue for voters in this campaign IS The Money from Wall St flowing into our political system. And is the recipient of untold amounts of that money.

She did indeed invoke 9/11 to try to lead people to believe she has already paid Wall St anything they might think she owed them.

Except that is not true.

Their Senator." She said it herself that she was Wall Street's Senator. That's the problem. We need a president that isn't the president for Wall Street.

Democrats believe that big money in politics has decimated the 99%. Why would anyone back "Big Money"?

I spent 7 1/2 years helping rebuild WTC. 4 on the Freedom Tower, 2 on The Transit Hub and 1 1/2 working on Tower 3 (until an accident on the job 3 months ago ended my career) and I NEVER saw her!?!? The only thing she rebuilt in the Financial district was her bank account and that of former President Clinton. All the money she's gotten WILL come at a price!

Or is this post an example of distortion itself?

>shakes head wearily<

Bosnian sniper fire with her daughter in tow. IWR vote. Regime change. 9/11-I Am Woman-9/11!!!. #12IsEnough! Single payer too expensive. "CUT IT OUT!" Fake southern accent. Vince Foster. White Water. Clinton Foundation and arms deals. Private email server.

25 years of providing the GOP with talking negative points. Doesn't matter that some of these are pure crap (Benghazi for example which I didn't even list) because she put herself in these situations through her own actions. Even when presented with her own words invoking 9/11 as an excuse to take millions from Wall ST, you refuse to see it. That's fine, it's your choice as it's mine not to trust one word that comes out of her mouth.

Hillary Clinton is pathetic. But I realize that hatred has formed itself on many DU writers. We have become "he said- she said" in a smug manner patting ourselves on our backs. Been here since 2002 still hoping we will grow up.

Your math is off. Sniper fire was a lie, period and during her last "crowning", as was her fake accent. Libya and Honduras during her SoS tenure, not 25 years ago. 12 bucks an hour is last week. I hate broccoli and her lies, obfuscation and Wall Street coziness. The GOP hate her will not vote for her as well as many independents and young voters who identify with traditional Democratic values like single payer, 15/hr and breaking up big banks.

elect someone not controlled by Big Money. We need a change from the corrupt establishment she represents.

Not impressed with that guy at all.

Then again, I like Democrats, not people who relentlessly trash them ... so shoot me!

Long may he write.

K&R

rather than look at truly what she was saying. It is always easier as a writer to go for the superficial.

Or rather lack thereof.

As others have said, she is an opportunist.

That arrow on the logo? Points in any direction that she thinks will serve her interests and those of her paymasters.

Blue H Red direction...in keeping with the colors assigned to the two parties.
It is as if they talk to us in symbols.

Which is apparently true to an undetermined extent. They pretty much draw pictures telling us where they stand, but it seems to be missed by a lot of people.

I mean what will we do if we do notice it call it out loud?...and then be called a conspiracy theorista or paranoid? How many times have you heard that when one questions the official story told?

As long as they can control the narrative we can notice all we want and it won't change shit.

I haven't seen much but superficial attacks from him.

Most folks wouldn't believe it, but I used to be quite a fan of his and defended him many times.

Not so much anymore.

Are you saying he didn't do it?

What the fuck?

Did someone falsely bearing his name post that garbage? How else could it possibly be "debunked?"

Pitt's superficial attacks are no longer favoured by you because because he concluded a critique about policy with a metaphor you didn't like. It was the metaphor, not the critique that made you change your mind. Superficial is as superficial does.

He didn't just say it once. He doubled and tripled and quadrupled down on that crap.

And his post was celebrated on many right wing websites.

Just sayin.... not a fan anymore.

we should wait and see what happens before piling on him or Leopold.

I was also a fan until his hyperbolic attacks on Obama.

I don't recall ever seeing any articles posted here that were written about waiting, that's just not the DU way.

Yes, many here didn't like it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x210548

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_steven_l_060515_karl_rove_indictment.htm

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=10928

"I've been watching political debates of all kinds since God wore short pants, and this ranked right up there with the most vile, disingenuous, sneaky, low-road slippery debate statements I have ever heard."

"People who will say anything to win office are truly frightening, and truly dangerous."

And exactly right as regards Ms Clinton.

If you want to know which way the wind blows, ask Hillary. But don't expect an answer until she runs a focus group. Oh and you won't be able to ask as you won't be able to get past her handlers and minders.

with so many significant contributors leaving, what will be left of DU?

And, boy oh boy was his goodbye thread trolled by posters who cannot write anything but one or two lines of snark to troll everyone else.

yes he did

Will has the capacity to be a quite good writer -- I've "known" him here since 2002, so I speak with that authority -- but at times he goes completely off the rails and POSUCS was one such time. Given proof to the contrary, he doubled down. Proven wrong, he never said "sorry," afaik.

He still has many fans here, but has also lost his charm for quite a few others. He decided to take an extended break, and yes, it was of his own free will. He'll always have his column at Daily Kos or whatever that he's had for a decade and a half.

24 business hours...what a joke of a "journalist"!

I read this yesterday, but had to recommend!

Or iz its a sadz?

Maybe both?

They crucified us for piling on a FOX News guest who also posts on this site, but are fine with calling another member's work "putrid vomit".

And yes, I agree:

Of posting boldly original insights two or three days after others have already done so.

I've noticed the same thing with your posts, particularly the ones concerning woo.

You obviously read something, think about it, and then post.

I've seldom 'seen' you shoot from the hip.

especially since she said this one day
after the attack on Paris.

I'm glad to see I was wrong

is a candidate losing it during the GE.

If it was only a matter of time, I'm glad that time was now...

There is no need of that. He speaks for himself, as do we all.

now he uses surrogates to post his dribble. He is just a like a "pos" used car sales man except he push his dribble in print.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024734785

People who bring his posts here are doing it so that we can read them.

He is on Facebook, for anyone interested.

Face it, this is hero worship of someone who is not well liked by many here.

And 'blessed'? Ugh.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]

worth reading, he has moved on.

Who told you 'he is using surrogates', did he ask anyone to post his writings here?

Like many others who helped build this forum by attracting people her because of their writing, he has moved on to larger audiences where people can still do what they used to do here, only better.

All of them.

yours eg.

But it's not a surprise that people might remember Will's. He certainly wrote some great material starting in the early 2000s which brought many people to this site.

He always had a following among Democrats, and of course he had enemies, lots of them, on the Right. Who probably also remember his work. They didn't like it at all.

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

I miss his voice here.

...and it is important that writers say these things, because the majority in this country feels the same.

I was pleased to see that 90 percent of his Facebook friends passionately agree, as well.

She's totally lame.

What bothers me about Clinton, though, isn't that particularly, though it was cheap.

What bothers me is she's participating in this supposedly bipartisan effort to give the White House MORE war powers.

I mean, WTF?????

That's the wrong direction on SO many levels it makes me want to hurl.

Sid

and in good standing

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=102890

Last Post

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 11:45 AM

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7311270

Think about that ......... when you break the rules
and then complain about getting a hide. Oh and BTW
I won't alert but that's just me

Will......... great piece as normal

and still be considered a member in good standing.

Merry Fitzmas!

about what Mr. POSUCS is writing when he's not busy threatening to beat homeless women to death.

Years ago he threatened to beat a homeless DUer named Bobbolink.

He's a real charmer, that one.

Wasn't he chased away for not being liberal enough???

LOL!!

were super-mean to him by reminding people of what he's said over the years. Unable to cope with the increased temperature he chose to exit the cooking facilities.

Thank you!

I have no issue with the discussion.