Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,662 posts)
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:43 PM Nov 2015

Hillary Clinton panders to middle-class voters with unrealistic tax promises




Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks during the Iowa Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson fundraising dinner. (Charlie Neibergall/Associated Press)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-panders-to-middle-class-voters-with-unrealistic-tax-promises/2015/11/28/a7e55212-9208-11e5-8aa0-5d0946560a97_story.html

By Editorial Board November 28 at 6:23 PM

IF THERE is a social or economic need, Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton has a tax credit to match. She’s proposed one for businesses that institute profit-sharing plans (cost: $20 billion over 10 years); another for hiring disabled veterans; and, as of last week, a tax credit worth up to $1,200 to help families defray the cost of caring for their elderly members at home (a $10 billion, 10-year item). Coming soon: changes to Social Security to benefit workers who take time off to care for the elderly.

When it comes to paying for these “targeted” benefits, plus her other promises such as universal preschool, however, the former secretary of state has a clear principle: none of the 97 percent of U.S. households that earn $250,000 or less per year will be asked to contribute higher taxes.

If this strikes you as implausible — the Democratic equivalent of the no-tax-hike pledge Republican candidates regularly impose on themselves — we agree. There is simply no way that the federal government can meet its current fiscal commitments, plus the increased demands of an aging population, and provide the new forms of middle-class relief and business tax relief Ms. Clinton promises, while tapping only the top 3 percent of earners.

To the contrary, if the U.S. government is to do all those things and still reduce its long-term debt to a more manageable share of the total economy, middle- and upper-middle-class Americans are going to have to contribute more, not less. Examples: You can’t have securely funded national infrastructure programs without increasing the gas tax for the first time since 1993; and one way to shore up Social Security’s trust fund would be to raise the maximum amount of taxable earnings from the current level of $118,500.

FULL story at link.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton panders to middle-class voters with unrealistic tax promises (Original Post) Omaha Steve Nov 2015 OP
She is proposing an increase on people earning over $250,000 to increase their Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #1
Read her lips: AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #3
Obviously they think because none of the 97% Historic NY Nov 2015 #2
So you're betting that we can't help people? Buzz cook Nov 2015 #4
That is the republican way. /nt RiverLover Nov 2015 #5
And what does the conservative Post editorial board say about Bernie? bornskeptic Nov 2015 #6

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. She is proposing an increase on people earning over $250,000 to increase their
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 11:59 PM
Nov 2015

FICA tax, she does not want the increase on those earning below $250,000.

Historic NY

(37,451 posts)
2. Obviously they think because none of the 97%
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 02:42 AM
Nov 2015

of U.S. households that earn $250,000 or less per year will be asked to contribute higher taxes, is pandering. Unlike the way the code is set now that the top 3% pays a far less share of actual income.

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
6. And what does the conservative Post editorial board say about Bernie?
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 11:56 AM
Nov 2015

From later in the linked column:
But the truth is there isn’t really all that much difference between Ms. Clinton’s promise to soak the top 3 percent and Mr. Sanders’s promise to get the money he needs from the “billionaire class.” Both are selling the voters an unrealistic guarantee; both are ignoring the need for deficit reduction along with a modernized social safety net. Like the GOP candidates, the Democrats are offering ideas poll-tested and calculated to appeal to the party base, rather than creative approaches to the country’s fiscal predicament. Eventually, our leaders will have to stop pandering to the middle class, hopefully before a crisis forces them to face facts.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton panders t...