They may be ugly and violent, but they should have the right to vote. Still, it looks like CNN polled a questionable group, perhaps. Not likely voters, I'm guessing.

Sorry to push your buttons...

True story.

Of course they should vote.

No sex threads on DU, thanks.

I'm cool with either one, every voice deserves to be heard.

However, there are no Orcs in my precinct, I'm pretty sure. There's a lot of prejudice against them here.

Cheers!

On the Internet, nobody knows you're an Orc, after all.

Do they have proof of residence?
Pass a simple intelligence test?

I think not...

Wait... does the R in ORC stand for Republican? That was my assumption.

I was a leave, of course.

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

spam

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 5, 2015, 12:44 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The OP is pretty dumb, but I wouldn't hide it. Let the stupid shine.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If this is Spam, then I'll have the Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Baked Beans, Spam, Spam, and Spam

For pete's sake! That's funnier than the post.

I think your posts from this site bring some much needed comic relief. Too much fighting here, not enough smiling.

You're Welcome

I am in full support of Pythons and Spam, which is manufactured right here in Minnesota.

He opened up his Phoenix mansion for tours and brunch from time to time.......delightful fellow. May he rest in peace........

Edit....here is the mansion.....sold a few years after he died...... http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/blog/business/2013/12/see-inside-the-massive.html

By the way......I'm the juror that posted the Monty Python Spam Song in response to this being reported as Spam. #NotJoking

You keep posting things that have the look, but not the feel, of humor. See Oz. I hear he can help.

I clicked my red shoe heels together long ago, though. The Wizard turned out to be a fraud, anyhow.

To me, your post comes off as insanely childish, especially given the fact that if you know ANYTHING about stats, you would know ALL of their polls have been BLATANTLY skewed and have horrible age demographic samples for a national poll. You can make all of the jokes you want, but you really need to start looking at the facts. I highly doubt that you are 12 years old, so please, do yourself a favor & stop acting like it.

An 8.5 margin of error is INSANE. they should not put out polls that are riddled with such filth.

Do some reading; http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/sampling-error-means/story?id=5984818

I'll consider what you wrote.

In next chapter of Sanders-Clinton conspiracy theory, graphic takes aim at CNN's polling operation

By Louis Jacobson on Wednesday, October 21st, 2015 at 4:00 p.m
.
.
.
The reader sent us a post that showed an image of results from a CNN-ORC International poll taken between Oct. 14 and 17. On the image, two columns were circled in red -- two columns of sub-results by age group for a question about how favorably or unfavorably the respondent views Hillary Clinton.


.
.
.
Bottom line: It’s all a misunderstanding about how CNN reports the results of its surveys. (After we emailed questions to the person who had posted it on their Facebook page, we didn’t receive a response, but the post was pulled down. We saved a screenshot, above.)

The easiest way to debunk the graphic’s assumption is to look a few columns to the right. There, one can find a heading that reads "under 50," with 74 percent of respondents in that age group saying they feel favorably about Clinton, 23 percent saying they feel unfavorably, 3 percent saying they have no opinion and 1 percent saying they’ve never heard of her. (Our real question: Who belongs to the 1 percent who have never heard of Hillary Clinton?)

So this column of poll results clearly shows that people under 50 did tell the survey takers about their opinions about Clinton.
.
.
.
(more at above link) oh and:

We rate the claim Pants on Fire.