2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJoe Biden indirectly endorsing Hillary Clinton?
I dont know what his motive is, but I know what hes preaching is a very, very dangerous brew for America, Biden said of the billionaire businessman and Republican frontrunner during an interview Tuesday on Air Force Two on the flight home from a two-day visit to the Ukraine.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-09/biden-calls-trump-s-comments-on-muslims-a-dangerous-brew-
If Joe Biden isn't indirectly supporting Hillary Clinton, I think we can say Biden believes she will be the democratic nominee.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Response to ProudToBeLiberal (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)There's nothing to suggest he rather than the reporter brought up Hillary Clinton beating Trump.
Also this:
Truly grasping at straws, this OP.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)He could just as well have been asked about Trump's prospects vs. Hillary. It simply isn't recorded what the question was. Rather sloppy reporting.
Hence, grasping.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Because the full question and answer was not given, it is entirely conceivable that the exchange went as:
Biden: Then she would win in a walk.
See what I mean?
edit: I mean that in such an exchange Biden would be speaking in the future conditional tense, conditional on the question's premise that the nominee is Hillary.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Ron Green
(9,823 posts)the club, as are most Washington insiders. This is the very thing that has to change.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)They always go on about fighting the Washington Establishment. Whatever floats your boat.
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)as paid for by Wall Street and sold to the masses as "liberal," is not the problem that must be changed, then we're not on the same page. Or even in the same library.