2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Slams Media for 'Bernie Blackout,' Ignores Vermont Press
http://www.sevendaysvt.com/OffMessage/archives/2015/12/15/sanders-slams-media-for-bernie-blackout-ignores-vermont-pressSen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) stepped up his longstanding criticism of the national news media last weekend, complaining in a Friday press release that his presidential campaign "has been all but ignored" by television network newscasts.
"Its no shock to me that big networks, which are controlled by a handful of large corporations, have barely discussed our campaign and the important issues we are bringing up," Sanders said Saturday in an email to supporters. "Theyre just too busy covering [Republican presidential candidate] Donald Trump."
But even as Sanders rails against what his campaign refers to as a "Bernie blackout" in the national press, several reporters in his home state of Vermont complain they've had little to no access to the candidate since he launched his campaign last April.
"It's a little disappointing for a person who has been so accessible in the past to be frozen out like this," says Vermont Public Radio news director John Dillon. "You understand it from a pragmatic point of view. He's more concerned with Iowa than he is with Irasburg. But he's still our senator."....
More at link.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)"I chuckled when I saw him complain about the media (last weekend) because in his early years that used to be part of the playbook that we didn't cover his events," says WCAX-TV news director Anson Tebbetts, who has covered Sanders for decades.
The criticism has gone both ways. Vermont reporters have long chafed at Sanders' unwillingness to answer questions outside his comfort zone. After the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shootings three years ago, Sanders refused to speak to Seven Days about his views on gun rights for nearly three months.
"We've all been in a place where you're covering a news conference and Sen. Sanders doesn't want to go off-topic," Tebbetts says.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)In more ways than one!
And this is the press corps that knows him best...
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Bernie isn't
MADem
(135,425 posts)The guy is a late night comedian's DREAM....
?w=560&h=315
If Sanders did stuff like this, he'd get news coverage, too.
Not all coverage is "good" coverage, though, is it? I'm kind of stunned that people can't see the difference. This is amusing, short-term, but long term it resonates poorly.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)That's a half hour of selected stuff each night, going for impact and drama--not "Bernie Sanders gave the same stump speech in a different town" type coverage.
He's plainly not counting up all his Talking Head show guest spots, e.g. Face The Nation, Meet the Press, CNN and MSNBC appearances. If he included those, he'd be close to the head of the pack.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Sanders is pretty big news and world draw great ratings. But the people who own the media are .1%ers who don't want any part of a Sanders presidency. As for the Vermont npr, Bernie's now running a national campaign, so of course he doesn't have as much time as when his sole job is to serve Vermont.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And if he doesn't talk to the press, they won't talk to him--or cover him. It's how it works.
I hardly think "Clinton emails" and "Trump says he'll bomb the shit out of them" are "good" coverage. I think he's playing a card, here, and the locals have called him out on it.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)then he would get more coverage.
The truth is, he's not and he won't.
Sid
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)You should read/watch/listen to something besides right wing sites/stations. It's called manufacturing consent. Since republicans receive upwards of 85% of the coverage, does that mean Dems don't garner ratings? Sanders opinions on nearly all issues are with the majority of Americans. Instead the "news" gives all of the air time to extremists and DINOs.
Seriously, are you now going to tell us there is a liberal bias to the media?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Lately I have seen a few Hillary backers with the Third Way banner running around complaining about Sanders desiring excessive taxes and what not. They may as well go all the way with it.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)MSNBC primetime, the morning shows, and left-wing radio. A person would have to be not paying enough attention to miss him.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Cha
(297,309 posts)Thankfully I don't see him.. no tv.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Hell, they usually have ONE big news story that actually happened today; then maybe two or three "lesser" stories that we talked about here three days previously, and then some heartwarming story that is either about a cute sick kid, a cute sick puppy, a brave young woman (usually white, often blonde, always cute), or some cute old people who have either been abused, or have overcome hardships of some sort. Every now and again the little heartwarmer will be about a "Support the Troops" situation--cute, brave young family dealing with a severely disabled veteran, or a cute homeless veteran (with or without a prosthetic limb) who has overcome adversity thanks to the Kindness of Strangers (as opposed to federal law that would provide for him/her in event of disability).
In any event, the common denominator in these AWWW-heartstrings-tugging things is "cute." Oh, and they might give you a little sports and weather. But it's AWFUL--it's not "news." It's a condensation of a little ersatz news. You have to go to the web for news these days. Hell, I "watch" the news only because I know that Wheel and Jeopardy are coming on right after it! LOL! I have never learned anything "new" on the news--it's always something I've seen earlier on the net.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)was about the right wing witch hunt against her--NOT about her "campaign."
This was a disingenuous strategy on the part of Sanders, and if he keeps repeating it, it will serve him ill. He'll come off like a crybaby. A "yuuuuge" crybaby.
People aren't stupid, either. Every time I turn my damn television on Sundays--and other days, too, There's Bernie! He's on MTP, FTN, CNN, MSNBC, you name it. But he's not counting that stuff--he's counting "The Nightly News" which hasn't been covering Clinton's campaign at all, just the right wing hatchet attacks on her.
Guess what I'm watching right now? A clip from that "Killer Mike" interview on MSNBC....
But nooooo....Sanders gets no coverage. Feh and Meh.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)three stations in the US doesn't actually count as exposure IMO
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)tank for Bernie.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)So?
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)moment.
They will be back to normal after the primary.
dsc
(52,162 posts)to cite just one example, one of the Washington post reporters covering Hillary literally called her a bitch and was fired for doing so.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)about the debates, too. There was a story posted here that he previously snubbed an opponent for debates in Vermont when it didnt serve his purposes. But now nationally he sets himself up as the victim of the DNC by accusing DWS of trying to exclude him. So he clearly is self-serving and is just trying to make himself the martyr to fit his limited, superficial campaign narrative about evil such and such and so forth.
Now he's pulling this stunt about the press. So phony.
Thanks for posting this. Great local story.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)R B Garr
(16,954 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)and particularly Trump.
randys1
(16,286 posts)and talked about by many in the know, I listen to them on the radio and I trust the people who tell me so
2. Bernie is running a natl campaign and wont have the same amount of time for his local reporters that he had when he wasnt running
Criticizing Bernie for this is insincere, lets not play you know who's game.
MADem
(135,425 posts)This card has been played before.
I think it's interesting to know how a candidate deals with the media. Remember how much shade HRC got when she didn't want to be accosted by reporters drooling right wing email/Benghazi memes, while she was MARCHING in a PARADE, and had her staff keep 'em back with a rope line?
If we're going to examine how candidates deal with the media, what's good for the goose is certainly good for the gander--unless we're going to discount those reporters from VT, who have far more insight than any of us, individually, do?
John Poet
(2,510 posts)What about the Hillary freeze-out of the media?
MADem
(135,425 posts)It reflects the perspective of reporters who have covered Sanders, some for decades.
You don't have to like it but it is what it is.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)populist briny broth with a side order of neocon-diments.
IOW this is just another Hillvolution.
Forget about it just like many of her supporters have.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)has endorsed him.