2016 Postmortem

mmonk

(52,589 posts) Fri Dec 18, 2015, 08:36 AM Dec 2015

I will reserve judgment on the data breach.

In the meantime, the Sanders campaign will have to work with voter roll lists. What I don't like about all this are some of the connections between the software vendor, the DNC, and the party structure including the Clintons and how they can let the "investigation " drag out. This has ramifications that can cause a party rupture.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I will reserve judgment on the data breach. (Original Post) mmonk Dec 2015 OP

all the hell Sanders gives the NSA stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #1

I'll say this--when someone gets fired, AND the campaign refuses to respond to MADem Dec 2015 #2

I know right! nc4bo Dec 2015 #3

No, just ask the ghost of Richard Nixon. MoonRiver Dec 2015 #5

If Hillary ties this to Watergate it will blow up in her face SwampG8r Dec 2015 #8

+1 uponit7771 Dec 2015 #4

+1 JaneyVee Dec 2015 #6

Who has said the campaign is refusing to talk about this? n/t hootinholler Dec 2015 #7

Reserve judgement on Sanders. NCTraveler Dec 2015 #9

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)

1. all the hell Sanders gives the NSA

Reply to mmonk (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 08:41 AM

Dec 2015

MADem

(135,425 posts)

2. I'll say this--when someone gets fired, AND the campaign refuses to respond to

Reply to mmonk (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:02 AM

Dec 2015

repeated requests for information, there's something "up" all right.

And, when supporters run around ginning up outraged "petitions" to the DNC demanding reinstatement while insisting that "the campaign reported the breach" and it turns out that the VENDOR reported the breach, well, I think there's a problem percolating there.

The Sanders campaign needs to cough up three more names. The longer they wait, the more it appears that they're trying to conceal who those three people are. If it's "no one important" or a "low level staffer" then they'll get a few questions from the press and they can wave them off if they want.

The more they stonewall, the worse it looks.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)

3. I know right!

Reply to MADem (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:12 AM

Dec 2015

Just ask HRC.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)

5. No, just ask the ghost of Richard Nixon.

Reply to nc4bo (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:20 AM

Dec 2015

I'm just starting to read about this today, but there appear to be similarities with Watergate.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)

8. If Hillary ties this to Watergate it will blow up in her face

Reply to MoonRiver (Reply #5)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:11 PM

Dec 2015

Her Watergate skeletons are still rattling around

uponit7771

(90,359 posts)

4. +1

Reply to MADem (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:14 AM

Dec 2015

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

6. +1

Reply to MADem (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:21 AM

Dec 2015

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)

7. Who has said the campaign is refusing to talk about this? n/t

Reply to MADem (Reply #2)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:19 AM

Dec 2015

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

9. Reserve judgement on Sanders.

Reply to mmonk (Original post)

Fri Dec 18, 2015, 12:14 PM

Dec 2015

"and how they can let the "investigation " drag out.

Make assumptions about others that aren't born out in reality. Nice.

New campaign slogan. "Reserve Judgment, Pass the Buck!!!!"

Reply to this discussion