Where politicians drop their crap they don't want anyone to hear. Yes, Clinton included. lol.

If it is okay to hold a debate on a Saturday night and pretend that Hillary isn't hiding behind her pal, DWS - than I think it is just fine for a candidate to speak to the American so quickly after opposition forces attempt to swift boat him even if it is a Friday. I am quite sure that his management of this nonsense will draw a striking contrast between these candidates.

This is dirty politics by the DNC and by DWS and the whole thing disgusts me. This is turning into a very ugly election season.

Bernie or Bust.

I understand the desperate need of some to try to conflate the two. Endorsements matter. Something Clinton supporters have been trying to tell Sanders supporters for a while now. lol.

That is why I am voting for Bernie Sanders. He is honest, trustworthy and demonstrates decisive leadership skills. This issue, to me, demonstrates the corruption of the DNC and DWS - at least. The fact that DWS=DNC=HRC - that is the real scandal.

Should be an interesting presser....

the cookie jar should you do it?? The data director knew not to snoop around but he did. Curiosity got to him. He has no self control and put his fingers in the cookie jar.

That is when she will step down to great cheer. lol.

It is too close to the probability to be funny. Why are you laughing?

She should go work for the Clinton campaign in an official capacity instead of the underhanded way she's pretending to serve all Democrats.

Remember: this is the woman who left gerrymandered Republican districts intact while serving on a commission supposed to prevent gerrymandering. But that would have been harmful to her friend Ross-Lehtinen.

Just Clinton. She needs to go.

of the reasons they are doing an audit over the weekend.

to inform the DNC about the breach, they didn't do so. It was the vendor that informed the DNC.

Instead they had four users accessing the data.

instead of accessing it and not informing anyone.

"NGP VAN corrected the breach after the Sanders campaign alerted the company to it, according to the DNC.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/12/18/bernie-sanders-campaign-disciplined-accessing-clinton-data/77539432/

as it was the DNC's database.

If you had read the article I linked:
"Michael Briggs, Sanders' communications director, blamed NGP VAN for repeatedly dropping the firewall between the data of different Democratic campaigns even after the Sanders campaign informed the DNC months ago that the campaign data was being compromised
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/12/18/bernie-sanders-campaign-disciplined-accessing-clinton-data/77539432/

instead they accessed the information first and only after doing that they informed the vendor not the DNC.

I gave you a direct quote from the article, from the Sanders campaign and the DNC:
If you had read the article I linked:
"Michael Briggs, Sanders' communications director, blamed NGP VAN for repeatedly dropping the firewall between the data of different Democratic campaigns even after the Sanders campaign informed the DNC months ago that the campaign data was being compromised.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/12/18/bernie-sanders-campaign-disciplined-accessing-clinton-data/77539432/

more egregious, showing their accessing and downloading the data was not an 'accidental' find but, rather, a deliberate action on their part. Completely unethical actions at the very least, imo.

It is what you want to believe because you have an agenda.
The Sanders campaign have been the only people upfront and honest about the issues with the vendor.
I think you should be asking the national chair for Hillary for president/DNC chair/person that makes all the rules why they didn't act on that information for months.