I will NOT vote for her no matter what if she's the nominee.

The records PROVE he lied:

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/da7e5f2765814506a2519ea03055c1e6/dnc-barring-sanders-team-accessing-data-after-breach

Time for Sanders' name to be pulled from the ballots if he doesn't stop this shit immediately.

He comes in as an outsider and the first thing they do is complain about the rules.

Then they break the rules and blame the party.

Typical crap from Sanders.

Not that you will.

I really hope Sanders wins the primary just to watch how Clinton's peeps on DU deal with it. Well, that's not the main reason to hope he wins, but it will be an amusing side effect.

And they probably will be if there was actual wrong doing. Sanders is, if anything, extremely ethical.

YOU are very biased and/or employed by Clinton's campaign, so nothing you say - CAPS!!!1! notwithstanding - can be taken seriously regarding Senator Sanders.

You might want to learn something bout how IT works.

As for IT the Bernie group has several IT workers and they have explained it in detail in the group. Whereas your link was just an anonymous whatever... that explained and proved NOTHING. Nada. Zip. Ziltch. Nothing. Now I'm off and out of GDP. Have a nice day

So when is Sanders going to fire the other three miscreants?

And this fits right in with what I am thinking.

Too convenient, too coincidental.

this will hurt the DNC and the HRC camp, mark my words.

I practiced law for a long time and the two things that seemed to happen when someone was being set up: Too convenient and too coincidental.

If this BS does not fit both of those categories!

turds on their faces.

ooops.

He added, "To the best of my knowledge, nobody took anything that would have given the (Sanders) campaign any benefit."

.......

"We investigated it for a short period of time to see the scope of the Sanders campaign's exposure and then the breach was shut down presumably by the vendor," he said. "We did not gain any material benefit."


.........


"This wasn't the first time we identified a bad breach," he said, confirming to CNN that the Sanders campaign reported another breach to the DNC in October. "We reported it to them. They thanked us for reporting it and they told us the breach had been closed."

"In retrospect, I got a little panicky because our data was totally exposed, too," Uretsky said of how he handled the latest breach. " We had to have an assessment, and understand of how broad the exposure was and I had to document it so that I could try to calm down and think about what actually happened so that I could figure out how to protect our stuff."

It all goes together. But the OP was that they didn't look at the files and that's just not true.

I don't see a thing in that story about downloading.

It's more plainly stated here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141291758

trying to determine the security of Sanders data and took nothing that would have advantaged the Sanders's campaign. This is bs. Not to mention that Hillary's guy is responsible for the breach and for not taking care of it when the Sanders campaign reported it. This story reeks.

Uretsky says he got into the system to create a record to make it clear to anyone with NBG-VAN knowledge that he was "going through stuff that I wasn't supposed to have access to."

NGP-VAN is the technology company that provides campaigns access to the voter files.

The point: He wanted people with knowledge of the voter files to be able to clearly see that he was testing the depth of the breach.

"This wasn't the first time we identified a bad breach," he said, confirming to CNN that the Sanders campaign reported another breach to the DNC in October. "We reported it to them. They thanked us for reporting it and they told us the breach had been closed."

"In retrospect, I got a little panicky because our data was totally exposed, too," Uretsky said of how he handled the latest breach. " We had to have an assessment, and understand of how broad the exposure was and I had to document it so that I could try to calm down and think about what actually happened so that I could figure out how to protect our stuff

The whole thing is a giant over-reaction.

I corrected two factual errors without passing judgement. Both link to information with no comment from me.

Do I have this right-
The DNC "rents" data to both the Sanders and Clinton campaign.
Do they keep the data on the same servers?
Did this guy use his log on he had been assigned and have access to the data?
Or did he steal someone else's password or crack another login? or did he some how hack in to the root of the system?

From what I'm reading, it sounds like the Clinton database was open to his account, that he could access these data from his own account.

Concern was that Sander's data was also available to anyone as well.

Data his campaign put into his own data base.
They didn't take the whole thing down for a security review.
They didn't take anyone else's access away.
They just tried to cripple Bernie's campaign 6 weeks before the IA caucuses.

That is the big deal.

Right when Bernie needs to start calling and firming up his supporters they pull his list of addresses and phone numbers.

Does anyone here actually believe that the DNClinton did not have full access rights to Sanders' data?

I began receiving requests for donations about 6 weeks ago from DNC, DCCC and Hillary.
Before the incursion I did not receive these requests.

....the incompetence is amazing?