Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProudToBeLiberal

(3,964 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 04:03 PM Dec 2015

The Ever Changing Story From the Sander's Campaign on the Data Breach and Theft

The Sanders team's explanation of the incident has gradually changed since it was first confirmed late Thursday, initially saying that only a single “low-level” staffer accessed the Clinton data and that none of it was saved.

But the database logs created by NGP VAN show that four accounts associated with the Sanders team took advantage of the Wednesday morning breach. Staffers conducted searches that would be especially advantageous to the campaign, including lists of its likeliest supporters in 10 early voting states, including Iowa and New Hampshire. Campaigns rent access to a master file of DNC voter information the party, and update the files with their own data culled from field work and other investments.

After one Sanders account gained access to the Clinton data, the audits show, that user began sharing permissions with other Sanders users. The staffers who secured access to the Clinton data included national data director Josh Uretsky, who was fired on Thursday, and his deputy, Russell Drapkin. The two other usernames that viewed Clinton information were “talani" and "csmith_bernie," created by Uretsky's account after the breach began.

Though the Sanders campaign initially claimed that it had not saved Clinton data, the logs show that the Vermont senator’s team created at least 24 lists during the 40-minute breach, which started at 10:40 a.m., and saved those lists to their personal folders. The Sanders searches included New Hampshire lists related to likely voters, "HFA Turnout 60-100" and "HFA Support 50-100," that were conducted and saved by Uretsky. Drapkin's account searched for and saved lists including less likely Clinton voters, "HFA Support <30" in Iowa, and "HFA Turnout 30-70"' in New Hampshire.

Uretsky told CNN on Friday that he probed the Clinton data to get a sense of the full extent of the problem, but the breach was reported to NGP VAN by a third party, not by the Sanders campaign, a source familiar with the investigation said. "We knew there was a security breach in the data, and we were just trying to understand it and what was happening," he said. "To the best of my knowledge, nobody took anything that would have given the (Sanders) campaign any benefit."


More at http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-18/sanders-campaign-fires-data-director-after-breach-of-clinton-files
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Ever Changing Story From the Sander's Campaign on the Data Breach and Theft (Original Post) ProudToBeLiberal Dec 2015 OP
"I robbed the house to alert the owners they left the door open" JaneyVee Dec 2015 #1
Sounds like a Rovian excuse. Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #3
Nixon-Esque. itsrobert Dec 2015 #2
I think the coverup will be the undoing of Sander's campaign ProudToBeLiberal Dec 2015 #4
The raw data can't be saved, but lists and reports apparently can. MineralMan Dec 2015 #5
That is not good. wildeyed Dec 2015 #6
The breach seems to be more extensive than we thought ProudToBeLiberal Dec 2015 #7

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
5. The raw data can't be saved, but lists and reports apparently can.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:11 PM
Dec 2015

And those are the most important things. Campaigns do detailed queries to get lists they think might be useful to them. Those can be saved, or they are useless.

This is looking more and more like stinky behavior on the Sanders campaign's part, to build some lists they thought they might use while Clinton's information was accessible to them. That's illegitimate and violates their privilege at the DNC. This sounds more and more wrong, the more I hear about it. This will all come out, and no amount of bluster will defuse such breaches of established protocols.

It stinks on ice, if this is true.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
6. That is not good.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 05:37 PM
Dec 2015

Understanding what was happening by sharing permissions and then compiling as many advantageous lists as they could in a short period? My ass.....

Staffers conducted searches that would be especially advantageous to the campaign, including lists of its likeliest supporters in 10 early voting states, including Iowa and New Hampshire.


I would buy the "inexperienced young people" line of defense, but not with the campaign "unleashing fierce attacks". You can't ask forgiveness and attack at the same time. So much for the ethical high ground....

ProudToBeLiberal

(3,964 posts)
7. The breach seems to be more extensive than we thought
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:18 PM
Dec 2015

Sander's campaign tried to downplay it, but the truth is coming out.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Ever Changing Story F...