Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:10 PM Dec 2015

DWS on msnbc saying she personally called Sanders yesterday and informed him

of the data breach --and said his campaign had not informed him (this would have been on Thursday). But the breach had occurred on Wednesday. She went onto say that Sanders is a good man-a man of integrity who has run a good campaign but his staff has not served him well. I am glad she said this (on msnbc just now).



This is the type of data that the Sanders camp assessed....




....

.....What was accessed


Two senior Democrats familiar with the program and the investigation told CNN that the Sanders campaign accessed turnout projections for Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, a key piece of strategy the Clinton campaign has been working on with modeling and analytics.

The Sanders team, which consisted of four people, ran multiple searches in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina and about 10 March states, including Florida and Colorado. In Iowa and New Hampshire, the Clinton campaign has ranked voters on a scale of 1-100 for turnout, enthusiasm and support, the senior Democrats said. The Sanders campaign ran two searches: "Show me all the Clinton people rated higher than 60" and "Show me all the people rated less than 30." This would be a key way of knowing who Sanders should target in the final weeks before voting: Ignore those above 60, while focus on those below 30, because they are looking for a Clinton alternative and might be open to Sanders.

The investigation into what information was lifted should only take a few days as there are audit logs and trails of the activity, which took place beginning around 10:40 a.m. and lasting for about 40 minutes, the senior Democrats said.

They added that the Clinton campaign views this as a big deal but will not say so publicly because it will fan the flames of liberal groups trying to fight with the DNC.

In a statement released Friday afternoon, the Clinton campaign called for the Sanders campaign and the DNC to "work expeditiously to ensure that our data is not in the Sanders campaign's account and that the Sanders campaign only have access to their own data."................


http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-dnc-suspension/index.html

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DWS on msnbc saying she personally called Sanders yesterday and informed him (Original Post) riversedge Dec 2015 OP
Let's talk about this in court..... daleanime Dec 2015 #1
Weaver rebuts says notadmblnd Dec 2015 #2
Weaver made mincemeat of DWS. earthside Dec 2015 #7
Weaver is a bloviating idiot who does not do his campaign any good the way he comes across riversedge Dec 2015 #8
They were not on together. He did not talk over Wasserman-Schultz notadmblnd Dec 2015 #11
He talked over the msnbc host. riversedge Dec 2015 #16
Deep doo doo VanillaRhapsody Dec 2015 #3
yep, this is against Sanders, they did not help Sanders. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #6
WEDNESDAY. So much for the months ago argument. Metric System Dec 2015 #4
Yes, the current dispute started Wed. -2 days ago, but there was riversedge Dec 2015 #14
See ya, wouldn't want to be ya!! haikugal Dec 2015 #5
She can personally call my ass Jester Messiah Dec 2015 #9
The breach was that recent? KingFlorez Dec 2015 #10
There were two different breaches - one recently and one three months ago (nt) Samantha Dec 2015 #13
I have two points: Sanders says in his legal documents his data was breached Samantha Dec 2015 #12
We only see the Sander's court document--or their side of the story. I have not seen any rebuttal riversedge Dec 2015 #15
But he had mentioned this early on in one of the videos I saw Samantha Dec 2015 #17
You would have to see the entire contract mythology Dec 2015 #18
I was thinking the same--we need to see the whole contract. riversedge Dec 2015 #19
The agreement is attached to the pleading as an exhibit Samantha Dec 2015 #21
I doubt that agreement applies if one party criminally made use of the data. stevenleser Dec 2015 #20

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
2. Weaver rebuts says
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:17 PM
Dec 2015

Wassermann-Schultz just lied.

He said he provide info yesterday and asked if they needed more to let him know. Showed his smart phone with the e-mail to prove it and offered up to msm if they want to verify.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
7. Weaver made mincemeat of DWS.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:22 PM
Dec 2015

Wassermann Schultz should be fired or should resign.
Her peevish lecturing on MSNBC is exactly what the Democrats don't need; her bias is so obvious that it is an embarrassment to the DNC.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
8. Weaver is a bloviating idiot who does not do his campaign any good the way he comes across
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:22 PM
Dec 2015

on TV--full charge ahead-not giving anyone else a chance to talk. Very rude.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
11. They were not on together. He did not talk over Wasserman-Schultz
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:26 PM
Dec 2015

So I don't know what you watched. Debbie should really cut down on her smoking, that cough really has me concerned.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
14. Yes, the current dispute started Wed. -2 days ago, but there was
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:47 PM
Dec 2015

another one in Oct that was taken care of internally. Seems the breach in Oct was noted but no one accessed the other camps date at the time. It is an asterisk compared to this one.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
9. She can personally call my ass
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:23 PM
Dec 2015

She knows what she has to do, and if she doesn't do it she can answer for it in court.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
12. I have two points: Sanders says in his legal documents his data was breached
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:32 PM
Dec 2015

"Upon information and belief..." now isn't that interesting? I wonder why DWS did not mention that to him?

The agreement says the DNC must give The Campaign ten days' notice if they were going to make the database unavailable. No notice was issued.

Sam

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
17. But he had mentioned this early on in one of the videos I saw
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:54 PM
Dec 2015

Now it is officially in the pleading. It appears there is evidence.

Sam

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
18. You would have to see the entire contract
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 09:59 PM
Dec 2015

I would assume that if there is an intentional breach (and running multiple queries for relevant data qualifies), then there is a clause that allows for a more immediate shut down of access.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
21. The agreement is attached to the pleading as an exhibit
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:48 PM
Dec 2015

I read it and I believe Sanders will get his access back.

Sanders asserts his own data was breached as well. That is in the pleading, but I am not sure if he is referring to the firewall failure 3 months ago, or something more recent. Just a simple short assertion.

Sam

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
20. I doubt that agreement applies if one party criminally made use of the data.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 10:02 PM
Dec 2015

I'd like to hear what DU attorneys like berry hill (Sanders supporter) and misanthrope (clinton supporter) have to say about that.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»DWS on msnbc saying she p...