You noticed the door to the adjoining suites you shared a floor with was open and wanted to know if your neighbor could fit trough the door into your suite and steal your stuff, so you walked through to see, knowing if you could, hey, either your neighbor probably already did, or at least could.

You only did it because the door to the neighboring suite kept being left open by someone, and you knew it wasn't you.
Sure, you tried to complain to the building manager about it, maybe put a lock on the door or somethin', but he just said, "sure thing kid" - but never did and it kept happening.

I myself don't trust the building manager because he is old pals and the former roomie of the tenant in the adjoining suite whose door you kept noticing would often be open leaving you vulnerable to them.

Now another former roomie of your neighbor has locked you out of the building and that damn door between the suites is still likely wide open, so now you should go to court because it's your place and you have a right to be let into your own part of the building.

And, on the other hand, if the Data Director was white hatting, why didn't he do the usual CYA thing and document what he was doing? Or did he - didn' t he and three staffers take screen shots of their browsing activities? Didn't the Bernie campaign notify DNC of this and DNC made it into a "breach"?

Data integrity is serious business in that line of work. Based on the record of actions taking by the Sanders data steward, the reference data list (a list of the data set, not the voter data itself) was worthless. All of the access control information was linked by name to Sanders data steward and had Sanders name in the queries. No action was taken to hide the actions they were taking. Why? They were building a case to make that point there was a serious issue that needed to be addressed.

K/R

and coordinated 25 specific searches through Hillary's data. And both NBC and ABC reported that they SAVED data -- they didn't just look at it.

Now, step into The DU Twilight Zone.

for swiping cookies.

Sanders' team initially reported it in October. Nothing was fixed. Why not? Somebody wanted it that way?


Here's an insightful post you may have missed:

Maybe that's why the ring leader's head was rolled.

Things are getting spicy!!

there were numerous downloaded and saved searches.

And Huffington Post. And Time.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sanders-sues-dnc_56748b06e4b06fa6887d883e?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013§ion=politics

Though Sanders' campaign has insisted that it did not keep the data its staffers viewed, Time magazine reported Friday that those staffers appear “to have obtained files with lists of voters that the Clinton campaign had cultivated in 10 early states including Iowa and New Hampshire” and that the staffers “created from scratch no fewer than 24 lists -- consisting entirely of data pulled down from the Clinton campaign’s database -- and saved them to their personal folders.”

SNIP

In addition, the Sanders campaign has said that it did not download or retain any of the Clinton campaign’s data, and Weaver reiterated that claim on Friday afternoon at a press conference in Washington. “This campaign does not possess any data, does not retain any data and does not want any data,” said Weaver.

But the records from the NGP VAN software indicate that Sanders staffers did in fact save data to its own folders.

I doubt that anyone can teach you or anybody else how all this works in one post. It usually takes years.

because he's ethical.

because he's ethical?

you're not? what does that mean?

are trying to justify, on the "white hat" theory.

You don't go around stealing other political campaigns' voter targeting information, downloading dozens of searches into your own folder, on the white hat theory. Not if you're ethical.

Which is why they fired Uretsky and didn't even let him resign.

And yet for some inexplicable reason Bernie supporters feel the need to defend the guy.

not true ...those are all unsubstantiated claims...every single one of them

... disenginous at best

Imagine that! A Democrat working for the VAN company! Who do they think is going to run the company? Karl Rove? Boehner?

Politico has a headline screaming "Clinton Goes For the Jugular" http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/clintons-offense-will-be-personal-216962 indicating she was poised for the attack on the heels of the DNC's kabuki theater regarding the data breach. The Sanders campaign clearly were able to prove they had warned the DNC about the faulty firewall months ago, putting the onus of mismanagement back where it belongs, on the vendor and the DNC, both solidly in the Clinton camp. And the scheme to frag Bernie goes poof.

Slimier with each passing day. The republicans used to be the only ones with morals like this. Now the dinos have infested my party.

Thanks for the thread, Electric Monk.