Correct, though what exactly that means is unclear.



Yup.



To Sanders' files.



It's not. Though it's been noted that the person managing hte firewall is a former employee of hers or something. DWS's overreaction in barring sanders from his campaign's files seems a move for clinton as well.



At this point very little under the political sun surprises me.



Evidently so, at least on this particular security system.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=916203

worth the read

"Old Clinton hand" and they decided to see how much HRC could see by seeing how much they could see" sounds a lot like, "we broke into their house to see if they could break in our house too, because we have the same doors"

has worked for the Clinton campaign in the past - since 1992. And the later was referring to the fact that when the firewall was down, it was down for everyone.

But did they? I mean, we know Sanders did...but this working for Clinton back in '92 doesn't mean he's worked for her *since* '92, right? Did Clinton's campaign request Shultz deny him access? Why doesn't his campaign have his own voter files?

A member of his staff did, who claims it was to prove the firewall breach they reported months ago and yet it still was a problem. Whether that staffer was telling the truth about his motives, I can't say. He was fired from his position at any rate.

I am actually getting raw feelings toward certain DU members who I've quite liked in the past. I don't like feeling this way. It feels like the Civil War, you know, the brother against brother thing.