Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

grasswire

(50,130 posts) Sat Dec 19, 2015, 04:35 AM Dec 2015

26

something else is pissing me off about Wasserman Schultz

What goddam right does she have to characterize communication from the Sanders campaign as "BLATHER"??

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

something else is pissing me off about Wasserman Schultz (Original Post) grasswire Dec 2015 OP

The word I saw earlier was "bluster". pacalo Dec 2015 #1

Just following orders! Nt. Juicy_Bellows Dec 2015 #2

1% talk, treating inferior beings like dirt. its par for their course roguevalley Dec 2015 #3

"inferior beings"? PowerToThePeople Dec 2015 #4

It's truly how the 1%ers see us, so I assume the poster meant what was writen. /nt Dragonfli Dec 2015 #6

How about the word "systematically"? Flying Squirrel Dec 2015 #5

Excellent relevant point. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #18

Careful about focussing on the tool, rather than the user. snot Dec 2015 #7

She's a tool, you've got that right. Scootaloo Dec 2015 #8

Her bias is VERY apparent by now. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #9

Huge +1! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #17

yep she did seem sort of upset azurnoir Dec 2015 #10

I think this will ultimately be the ruination of HRC's campaign for thoughtful Democrats. anniebelle Dec 2015 #11

Happy Birthday, anniebelle. Unknown Beatle Dec 2015 #12

Thanks anniebelle Dec 2015 #19

Happy Birthday, anniebelle! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #16

Power Sun_q Dec 2015 #13

I caught that too. Among other things. Blatant. Enthusiast Dec 2015 #14

There will be charges filed. stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #15

pacalo

(24,721 posts)

1. The word I saw earlier was "bluster".

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 05:01 AM

Dec 2015

I call it "giving them hell" on OUR behalf.

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)

2. Just following orders! Nt.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 05:06 AM

Dec 2015

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)

3. 1% talk, treating inferior beings like dirt. its par for their course

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 05:28 AM

Dec 2015

go to her facebook page and feel the bern, her and HRC

I love the smell of tactics backfiring in the morning.

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)

4. "inferior beings"?

Reply to roguevalley (Reply #3)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 05:30 AM

Dec 2015

Is that truly what you meant?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)

6. It's truly how the 1%ers see us, so I assume the poster meant what was writen. /nt

Reply to PowerToThePeople (Reply #4)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:09 AM

Dec 2015

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)

5. How about the word "systematically"?

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 05:51 AM

Dec 2015

How do you "systematically" access campaign information over a single 40-minute period?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

18. Excellent relevant point.

Reply to Flying Squirrel (Reply #5)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:24 AM

Dec 2015

snot

(10,530 posts)

7. Careful about focussing on the tool, rather than the user.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:14 AM

Dec 2015

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)

8. She's a tool, you've got that right.

Reply to snot (Reply #7)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:39 AM

Dec 2015

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)

9. Her bias is VERY apparent by now.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:50 AM

Dec 2015

The woman has no class and no decency. Jsut a preference for one candidate and one only.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

17. Huge +1!

Reply to Betty Karlson (Reply #9)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:23 AM

Dec 2015

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)

10. yep she did seem sort of upset

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 06:54 AM

Dec 2015

anniebelle

(899 posts)

11. I think this will ultimately be the ruination of HRC's campaign for thoughtful Democrats.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:07 AM

Dec 2015

I remember all too well some of the tactics used by Hillary (with Bill's assistance) to create racial fears in her last campaign. I am a 'yellow dog' Democrat and have been for all my voting life ~ 71 years old today ~ and I will support our candidate, but our party has to be careful and not feed the repukes with ammunition to use in the general.

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)

12. Happy Birthday, anniebelle.

Reply to anniebelle (Reply #11)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:19 AM

Dec 2015

May you live to be over 100 in good health.

anniebelle

(899 posts)

19. Thanks

Reply to Unknown Beatle (Reply #12)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:25 AM

Dec 2015

and thanks for the wonderful songs

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

16. Happy Birthday, anniebelle!

Reply to anniebelle (Reply #11)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:22 AM

Dec 2015

Sun_q

(3 posts)

13. Power

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:19 AM

Dec 2015

I worry about her entitlement to power. The dismissive tone.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

14. I caught that too. Among other things. Blatant.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:21 AM

Dec 2015

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)

15. There will be charges filed.

Reply to grasswire (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 07:21 AM

Dec 2015

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»something else is pissing...