However, you're just plain wrong.

The Bernie campaign stole Hillary's campaign material and tried to bully the DNC to get away with it.

A firewall was allowed to go down. The IT guy is connected to Hillary, and the firewall problem has apparently been an on-going problem. Clearly the IT people are incompetent at best. A lot of people think that it may have been an attempt to lure the Sanders people into doing something wrong, but I have no opinion on that hypothesis. Meanwhile, it was the SANDERS campaign that reported the problem, and they were the ones punished. Which alas, is what almost always happens to whistleblowers. They weren't trying to get away with anything, just insisted they get back the access to the entire data base that they were entitled to.

I'm perfectly willing to believe that Clinton people took a good look at the Sanders side of the downed firewall, but have not had the integrity to say so.

lol... you are hilarious... almost as much as Randy...

There's two.

They both yell a lot when on the stump.

There's three.

I could go on.

thinking Moh.. lmfao

not very insightful...

I believe that Bernie is the best hope this country's got, and that this data thing is the DNC's desperate attempt to secure Bernie's defeat at any cost. But I'll concede that yes, Bernie has bad hair.

Very bad hair.

that he is unfit to serve even in his current capacity as a Senator.

a Sanders jury would hide my post.

Appearance? Make your point then instead of hiding behind playground insults.

He has contempt for liberal justices, just so you know.

Too difficult to read FACTS, I guess.

As Hepburn said, 'Bernie had a total winner on his petn for injunctive relief. IMO, all they are doing now is mitigating the damages which were alleged in the alternative causes of action in the petn.'

What's with the insulting ("Too difficult to read FACTS, I guess.&quot personal attack? You're better than this, elleng.

Remember: it was O'Malley who first complained about the rigging of the debates (number of times, dates...). Team MOM can see that what happened to Sanders could easilly have happened to them to. And they are too Democratic to let DWS get away with it.

If the DNC had sucha strong case that Sanders campaign had "stolen" data (accessed is a better word here), whey were they afraid to take it to court?

The bias from team Clinton and DWS is now apparent for everyone to see. And it is ugly to behold.

But please keep repeating today's attempt at talking points in favour of Clinton. She was due another round of victimhood I guess.

Let us know when we are to return to the usual program of "racist, sexist, socialist, 9/11."

It is up to DOJ if they want to prosecute.

Here are some of those "FACTS" you claim are "too difficult to read":

Same with the vendor's earlier attempt to downplay the breach.

What else you got?

My point is it doesn't take a genius, or a law degree, which I (and Hepburn have) to conclude that DNC/DWS wronged Sanders in this action. And DNC has been wronging all 'other than hrc' candidates.

We will see if integrity is one of his strengths, tonight.

ya'll seem to be, pretty much, the standard for activist Clinton supporters.

Really, threads upon threads trashing HRC and her supporters, but I guess that's ok.

In a similar way we could say:

Evita Perron was an important female politician, and known to be deeply corrupt. Clinton is also an important female politician, therefore we will compare her to Perron. Even though we could also compare her to female politicians not known for blatant corruption, we are going to make just this one comparison.

Why: because it slanders the man / woman.

Funny how predicable it all was!

... they knew they had no right to access - but it's DWS who's "in trouble"?

You can't make this shit up. You really can't.

Bernies calling for a FULL AUDIT!

Bet DWS/Hillary fight it tooth and nail!

... than why did Bernie fire a staff member for engaging in wrongdoing?

Did BS just throw him under the bus for kicks? If Bernie doesn't know or firmly believe that said employee is actually guilty of something, why did he fire him?

She reacted to being sued, trying to save her own corrupt skin. Thanks for the free exposure, finally, DWS/Hillary!

from opposing parties is prohibited and may be suspect. I'll keep that in mind when I attend a fellow Republican's dress or not event and be sure not to take pictures.

Geez

are not running for President on the Democratic ticket. Which since you just stated that: "when I attend a FELLOW Republican's dress or not event," indicates that you are saying you are a Republican. Very telling, indeed.

Are you now denying that you did not say someone was a FELLOW Republican?

I really am not concerned about who you vote for, unless it is a Republic. Not an attack, I asked you a question and you did not answer the question, just called it an attack. And then you gave me the "F*** You" symbol.

Play dirty to win by adding obstacles to the path of your opponents.

I think Bernie has not handled this very well at all. I was deeply disappointed that a man who is prized for his integrity did not simply allow the audit, cooperate with the DNC, and made sure that all the guilty parties get fired. Instead he chose to make politics out of this and sue the DNC. Yes, the DNC prefers Hillary - duh. She's been a significant Democrat for years. Bernie has been one for all of 5 minutes. But that bias would not have been an issue if Bernie's campaign people did not go snooping in Clinton's files. And the fact that Bernie supporters immediately started blaming Hillary for the whole mess has been seriously off-putting.

But to compare Bernie to Trump is not right. Trump is a demagogue whose ideas are akin to those of Adolf Hitler. Bernie may have shown less than wonderful leadership in this situation, but he does not deserve to be compared to that horrible man, in any way.

His actions during this scandal certainly are similar to the actions of past demagogues in similar situations.

How absurd.

without him controlling what the questions are either.

All politicians bluster their way in and out of politics in general.

guess Bernie shares one thing in common with Trump.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251918331

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

1) Post's body - one brief sentence - fails to present cogent analysis supportive of post's title;

2) Post is ostensibly intended for purely inflammatory purposes and better suited - if at all - as merely a response in an overall thread.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:35 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: So true.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Fighting the war room? I'm shocked...
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: What the hell? Guys on both sides need to grow up a bit. The censorship of posts should rise to a certain level before a takedown request is even asked. Skinner really needs to add counters on each person's profile pages so people can see the details of: How many flags were requested and how many times a person censored a post. These people need to be exposed, sort of like the percentage of serving on a jury.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Of how to get media attention. We have been jokingly telling them how to do it. Lol