she basically couldn't handle it properly.

the Clinton camp--what would you want DWS to do? --and would want to make sure that the pouched data was deleted?



The logs tell the story of who got what information. If the Clinton camp had tapped into the Sanders camp information and searched it for specific information--you can bet the farm, they would have let the media know by now. Instead what we have in the logs showing the the Sanders staff tapped into the Clinton proprietary data and did specific searches for specific information


"the logs show the Sanders staffers took deliberate steps to harvest and store the information."

http://time.com/4155185/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-data/

...............According to data reviewed by TIME, the Sanders campaign appears to have obtained files with lists of voters that the Clinton campaign had cultivated in 10 early states including Iowa and New Hampshire.

Beyond simply reviewing the data, the logs show the Sanders staffers took deliberate steps to harvest and store the information. According to the logs, the Sanders staff created from scratch no fewer than 24 lists—consisting entirely of data pulled down from the Clinton campaign’s database—and saved them to their personal folders.


The logs show the Sanders campaign accessed the Clinton data for nearly one hour beginning around 10:40 p.m. Wednesday. The Sanders staffers were apparently able to view unique voter information along with accompanying information about how likely the voters were to vote for the various candidates, crucial information that the Clinton campaign has likely spent millions of dollars to collect.

The Clinton campaign called for a clear accounting of the breach.

“We were informed that our proprietary data was breached by Sanders campaign staff in 25 searches by four different accounts and that this data was saved into the Sanders’ campaign account,” said spokesman Brian Fallon. “We are asking that the Sanders campaign and the DNC work expeditiously to ensure that our data is not in the Sanders campaign’s account and that the Sanders campaign only have access to their own data.”

Moreover, the Sanders staffers who carried out the breach included a top lieutenant for the Vermont senator: Josh Uretsky, the national data director for the campaign.

The Sanders campaign denied that it had downloaded any data, saying that it did not retain information from the Clinton campaign.

“They didn’t download it—they went in looked around,” said Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs, who announced Thursday the campaign was firing Utersky and that they were treating the matter seriously.

Uretsky also told MSNBC that the campaign “did not export any records or voter file data” and was simply trying “to document and understand the scope of the problem.”.................

Unless you are there working for them, you don't. There was a problem months ago, any of the campaigns could have gotten info about any of the others. Hopefully there will be a full investigation and we will see who got whose data.

LOL, just saying.

if you say so.

You guys are Hillarious

he ain't got nothin' on the Sanders logic displayed here.

It appears that admitting flaws and making efforts to mitigate and correct the damage isn't an option... so what's left for them to do besides thrash about with an absurd collection of justifications, excuses, and victim-blaming.

I can't decide if it's more frustrating, or more amusing. (I suppose it can be both.) But, no matter how you slice it, none of it is helping Bernie or his campaign.

Not "concerned" ... just observing.

For what it is worth, the Sanders campaign comes off very badly in the reporting.

eom

Really, that should be more important than any of the sideshow.

Lie....Cheat...Steal...

...over something that could've been handled privately, causing the DNC now to face an ongoing lawsuit in a primary campaign that could destroy the party and cause a scandal worse than 1972.

data. You forgot that part.

Pulling the trigger on the database set forth a set of events that brought the party to the precipice. DWS is not your friend. She backed off only because top Democrats made her.

into the theft of Hillary's data.

They collected to turn over to show this firewall was down?
' they don't exist because that was a lie

not responding to the DNC request for info.

It is too bad that Bernie had to learn about the problem from DWS because his own campaign manager withheld it from him.

I keep thinking about how M'OM would have handled this had it been his campaign involved in data theft. I think he would have sent everything the DNC asked for, personally called Hillary to apologize, possible fired a couple of people and handled it with grace and dignity. I bet his access wouldn't have been on hold for 30 minutes.

But it appears Bernie surrounds himself with in petani liars and thieves. I honestly believe Bernie didn't know about it until DWS called him. His management teams are dishonest and have given their own candidate a black eye. Yet to hear an apology from them for stealing data.

But I doubt his campaign would have done anything like this. They don't seem to be zealots.

Debbie Wassermann Schultz is incompetent and bias -- that is the issue surrounding her.

The DNC was told of the problems with the vendor months ago and DWS did nothing.

As a result of this incident, Sanders fired the errant staffer and again talked to DWS about this firewall problem.

But she overreacted because she is bias. Her statements yesterday were not diplomatic, not in the greater interests of the party, and demonstrated her bias.

My goodness, she was a Clinton campaign co-chair in 2008 -- she should have resigned as DNC chair once Hillary entered the nomination race -- the conflict of interest is obvious.

And, she was DNC chair for the 2014 election debacle for Democrats ... why Pres. Obama didn't fire her after that is s great mystery to just about everyone.

DWS needs to resign. Period.

The logs tell the story of who got what information. If the Clinton camp had tapped into the Sanders camp information and searched it for specific information--you can bet the farm, they would have let the media know by now. Instead what we have in the logs showing the the Sanders staff tapped into the Clinton proprietary data and did specific searches for specific information


"the logs show the Sanders staffers took deliberate steps to harvest and store the information."

http://time.com/4155185/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-data/

Sanders Campaign’s Breach of Clinton Data More Serious Than Disclosed

Sam Frizell @Sam_Frizell

Updated: Dec. 18, 2015 3:48 PM

...............According to data reviewed by TIME, the Sanders campaign appears to have obtained files with lists of voters that the Clinton campaign had cultivated in 10 early states including Iowa and New Hampshire.

Beyond simply reviewing the data, the logs show the Sanders staffers took deliberate steps to harvest and store the information. According to the logs, the Sanders staff created from scratch no fewer than 24 lists—consisting entirely of data pulled down from the Clinton campaign’s database—and saved them to their personal folders.


The logs show the Sanders campaign accessed the Clinton data for nearly one hour beginning around 10:40 p.m. Wednesday. The Sanders staffers were apparently able to view unique voter information along with accompanying information about how likely the voters were to vote for the various candidates, crucial information that the Clinton campaign has likely spent millions of dollars to collect.

The Clinton campaign called for a clear accounting of the breach.

“We were informed that our proprietary data was breached by Sanders campaign staff in 25 searches by four different accounts and that this data was saved into the Sanders’ campaign account,” said spokesman Brian Fallon. “We are asking that the Sanders campaign and the DNC work expeditiously to ensure that our data is not in the Sanders campaign’s account and that the Sanders campaign only have access to their own data.”

Moreover, the Sanders staffers who carried out the breach included a top lieutenant for the Vermont senator: Josh Uretsky, the national data director for the campaign.

The Sanders campaign denied that it had downloaded any data, saying that it did not retain information from the Clinton campaign.

“They didn’t download it—they went in looked around,” said Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs, who announced Thursday the campaign was firing Utersky and that they were treating the matter seriously.

Uretsky also told MSNBC that the campaign “did not export any records or voter file data” and was simply trying “to document and understand the scope of the problem.”.................

posting about DWS being associated with the Democratic Party. So Now I have to digest the fact that someone who has been an elected politician his entire (long) professional life, and who just became a Democrat like yesterday, bitching about lifelong Democrats associations with each other and him wanting to dictate who can associate with whom. OMG. I can not handle that.

... which was about DWS and her relationship to this 'scandal'.

Your 'logical' failure maybe in not fully appreciating how a bias DNC chair and a bias DNC and a bias party establishment are going to engender distrust and suspicion and inevitably lead to controversies like this.

1) notified them months in advance how they would breach the data.

2) Marked what they accessed.

3) Told them after they breached.


Bernie's campaign is so incompetent they hire the worst thieves ever.







Do I even need a sarcasm tag?

Not one fucking screenshot.....which is what anyone in data mining would do....

It doesnt exist.....because thats a bald face fucking lie....

It's all proven via timestamped access and command logs. The logs are what will be revealed in discovery during the suit. Those are stored on the servers.

When one believes in unicorns.

I don't see any furious backpedaling so your question does not compute.

bubble are they 'backpedaling"

alas the only lawsuit is Sanders's

The Bernie Campain wants to dig up dirt, or just threaten to. I thought he was all about the issues? I guess not.