On Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Where does the criminal Bernie fired fit in?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=920857

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Alleging that Bernie is a criminal is way over the top.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:38 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You are reading that wrong.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Post is a little harsh but not that big a deal. Sorry, free speech and all that. Bluejazz
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter made a mistake in reading comprehension. It's not "criminal Bernie", it's the "criminal" that "Bernie fired".
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yes, it would be over the top if the post was alleging Bernie is a criminal. But it does not. "Where does "the criminal" (that) Bernie fired fit in? Please don't be so quick to alert next time, because you are doing a disservice to DU when you failed to comprehend the sentence posted.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Although this alleges that the staffer who was fired is a "criminal," this is an OTT slam on the Sanders campaign.

(Don't bother to reply -- you're on my IL.)

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)

2. I have started looking at Jill Stein as a possible "Plan B" for the first time

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:24 PM

Dec 2015

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

6. It is looking more like you are arguing Sanders should be allowed free reign to cheat.

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:27 PM

Dec 2015

Hepburn

(21,054 posts)

9. Great pic! Thanks...n/t

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:32 PM

Dec 2015

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)

14. A picture really is worth a million words!

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:57 PM

Dec 2015

Spot on!

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)

17. Results.

Reply to Attorney in Texas (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 01:31 PM

Dec 2015

On Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I have started looking at Jill Stein as a possible "Plan B" for the first time
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=920888

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Openly advocating for a candidate from another party is against the TOS.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:29 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Shit stirring. HIDE.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Look, y'all already got Manny banned for not falling into groupthink...please stop with these frivolous alerts. It's already SupportHillaryClinton Underground as it is.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I just don't see how hiding this post accomplishes anything. I hope things cool down quickly because all this is hurting all Democrats. I just don't like hiding posts.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: After the primaries are over, yes, before, no. There is also a difference in "looking at" and "will".
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Fuck Jill Stein. And Rand Paul and any other libertarian green third party spoiler.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Geez, the primaries have not even happened yet.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)

18. Thanks for posting the results. My "Plan A" is a Democrat, and I'm only looking at a possible "Plan

Reply to LiberalArkie (Reply #17)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 02:24 PM

Dec 2015

B" that might include Jill Stein.

From what I'm reading about Stein, I'm very impressed with her (not as impressed with Sanders or O'Malley, but quite impressed).

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

4. The theory, if it walks like a duck. Sanders people stole and shifted the blame.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:26 PM

Dec 2015

DanTex

(20,709 posts)

7. Facebook conspiracy theories! Yum!

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:27 PM

Dec 2015

SHRED

(28,136 posts)

11. Pearlman and Schultz

Reply to DanTex (Reply #7)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:40 PM

Dec 2015

Both worked for Hillary. No "conspiracy" there.

leftofcool

(19,460 posts)

16. Also worked for Gore and Obama. But thanks for playing.

Reply to SHRED (Reply #11)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 01:28 PM

Dec 2015

moobu2

(4,822 posts)

8. Yeah how dare they make the Bernie Sanders campaign steal Hillary's data!!

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:29 PM

Dec 2015

those evil bastids!!

artislife

(9,497 posts)

21. I can't believe how fixated I have become on this

Reply to moobu2 (Reply #8)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 02:39 PM

Dec 2015

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=919606

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)

10. Corrupt to the core.

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:34 PM

Dec 2015

That's not even a question now. DWS came out in full support of HRH YESTERDAY and THAT is completely unethical since the DNC is there to support ALL the candidates without favoritism. She has failed miserably and needs to be FIRED, IMMEDIATELY.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)

12. +100000

Reply to in_cog_ni_to (Reply #10)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:41 PM

Dec 2015

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)

13. Yes - The Duplicity Is Apalling

Reply to in_cog_ni_to (Reply #10)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:42 PM

Dec 2015

eom

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)

15. There were two penalties on the play....

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Sat Dec 19, 2015, 01:10 PM

Dec 2015

10-yard penalty, repeat first down!

Come on! A Facebook post as proof of collusion? The oligarchy or the people! Only two choices? OMG, really? Anyone who likes Clinton is automatically in the oligarch column? John Lewis the oligarch, enemy of the people!

Reply to this discussion