2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumITS A CONSPIRAZY!!!
That circular chart meme you guys are floating claiming its all a conspiracy: https://mobile.twitter.com/AharonWasserman/status/678061075926007808
Response to JaneyVee (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
WIProgressive88
(314 posts)Knock it off.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152093250975723&set=pb.587125722.-2207520000.1450483614.&type=3&theater
But, none of that matters, anyway. The vendor fucked up. The Sanders campaign used responsible disclosure to point that out and the DNC blamed the Sanders campaign rather than the vendor.
The vendor needs to be fired.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)They exploited a known vulnerability that they had reported to the vendor.
The vendor did nothing, so, when it happened again, the Sanders teams took steps to document it.
The Sanders campaign named the queries things like "Not Sanders" because they were documenting the vulnerability.
I think you need to go read this thread and expand your understanding of technology and data breaches.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251915620
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)"Just one problem: NGP VAN says they were never alerted to such a problem, and in interviews on Friday afternoon, the former Sanders data director, Josh Uretsky, says the glitch being referred to wasnt even with the VAN. It was a different program. So not only did the Sanders campaign commit a lie of omission in their fundraising email, it appears they outright lied about the earlier problem to the press. Or, at the very least, this was yet another instance where many people inside the Sanders campaign dont seem to be on the same page."
http://iowastartingline.com/2015/12/19/sanders-campaigns-reckless-reaction-to-data-breach-is-a-danger-to-all-democrats/
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)The Sanders campaign seems to be just digging themselves into a bigger hole with the lying to cover up the wrongdoing. Then there is the truly stupid decision to continue forward with the lawsuit against the DNC. The depositions in that case should be a hoot. The first deposition I would set is of Sanders, to find out the circumstances of why he fired Uretsky.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Seems there was a conspiracy to get Clintons information.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... the sure sign of imaginative paranoia and conspiracy theories that originate from some tin-foil hatter who lives in their mother's basement. The only thing missing was an attempt to make an demonic or antichrist anagram of everyone's name.
Pure silliness. (I feel bad giving it even *this* much attention.)