Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 07:19 PM Dec 2015

Why Hillary Clinton’s Online Persona Doesn’t Connect With Minorities

On October 13, Saturday Night Live kicked off its show with a parody of the most recent Democratic debate. It was back when the stage had more candidates; Vice President Joe Biden had yet to decide whether he’d run for president and Bernie Sanders was having a moment. After the Vermont senator (played by Larry David) rattled off a few nonsensical promises, a worried Hillary Clinton (depicted by Kate McKinnon) interrupted:

“I’m not losing, am I?” she asked the audience with a furrowed brow. “I mean in 2008 of course I lost, I was running against a cool black guy. But this year I thought I got to be the cool black guy!”

Though the mere suggestion that a 68-year-old woman who regularly wears pantsuits and watches The Good Wife could somehow be this election’s “cool black guy” earned laughs from the crowd, it also hinted at what has lately been an identity struggle for Clinton’s campaign. The former secretary of state has built an undeniably savvy social media team that has mastered the art of shade, successfully co-opted the feminist declaration “yas queen,” and scheduled well-timed selfies with Kim Kardashian. But at the same time, her campaign has made tellingly awkward attempts at reaching and relating to young minority voters.

In early December, for instance, Clinton updated her social media accounts’ profile photos with a redesigned version of her campaign’s ubiquitous H logo, featuring an illustration of civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks. Though meant to commemorate the anniversary of Park’s civil disobedience, it drew criticism because Parks appeared to be sitting at the back of the bus. Then there was the infamous listicle, “7 Things Hillary Clinton Has in Common With Your Abuela,” (Spanish for grandmother) that appeared on Clinton’s website shortly after the her daughter, Chelsea, tweeted she was pregnant with a second child. It caused intense backlash in the Latino community on Twitter, where the hashtag #NotMyAbuela began trending worldwide, and people shared stories of their immigrant grandmothers’ hardships (far from the life experience of Clinton). Just two days later, her Twitter avatar was changed to yet another paint-by-numbers H logo, this time as a Kwanzaa candleholder. Black Twitter promptly clapped back with a #NewHillaryLogo campaign, that included memes depicting other blatantly pandering redesigns of the image. Her Twitter avatar was quickly replaced.

This unfortunate series of events have led some observers to call out Clinton for her endless thirst for attention or to charge that Clinton is sidestepping actual issues with cheap attempts at relating to minorities. But the Clinton team’s real problem in online outreach is one of tone. Slate’s Amanda Hess rightly characterizes the candidate’s online presence as less a reflection of Clinton than a series of accounts “written in the voice of a Hillary Clinton enthusiast eager to build an online fandom in her idol’s image.” This approach successfully walks the line between cultural appreciation and cultural appropriation, at least with respect to certain Internet-savvy and feminist subcultures. And even when the campaign got too enthusiastic with emoji, it was far from offensive.

MORE...

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/why-hillary-clintons-online-persona-doesnt-145508124.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hillary Clinton’s Online Persona Doesn’t Connect With Minorities (Original Post) Purveyor Dec 2015 OP
The minority issue has been twisted and turned to manipulate Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #1
What?! cali Dec 2015 #5
Hmmmph. ChairmanAgnostic Dec 2015 #7
This must be the reason Bernie is doing so well with comradebillyboy Dec 2015 #2
Attempting to establish granfaloons: catnhatnh Dec 2015 #3
Considering social media reaction as represtative firebrand80 Dec 2015 #4
All the pandering in the world will azmom Dec 2015 #6
Wait, who even said this? wildeyed Dec 2015 #8
K&R nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #9

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. The minority issue has been twisted and turned to manipulate
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 07:25 PM
Dec 2015

An answer desired by the manipulated, as twisted as it can be, the results is not determined by this manipulation.

comradebillyboy

(10,149 posts)
2. This must be the reason Bernie is doing so well with
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 07:30 PM
Dec 2015

minorities compared to Clinton, if I just completely ignore all of the polling data to the contrary. Bernie's dismal showing in South Carolina compared to Clinton tells me the author is simply detached from reality as she bases her 'analysis' on a very minor twitter dust up. What a completely shallow political analysis.

catnhatnh

(8,976 posts)
3. Attempting to establish granfaloons:
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 07:37 PM
Dec 2015

A granfalloon, in the fictional religion of Bokononism (created by Kurt Vonnegut in his 1963 novel Cat's Cradle), is defined as a "false karass". That is, it is a group of people who affect a shared identity or purpose, but whose mutual association is actually meaningless.

The granfalloon technique is a method of persuasion in which individuals are encouraged to identify with a particular granfalloon or social group.[1] The pressure to identify with a group is meant as a method of securing the individual's loyalty and commitment through adoption of the group's symbols, rituals, and beliefs. In social psychology the concept stems from research by the British social psychologist Henri Tajfel, whose findings have come to be known as the minimal group paradigm. In his research Tajfel found that strangers would form groups on the basis of completely inconsequential criteria. In one study Tajfel subjects were asked to watch a coin toss. They were then designated to a particular group based on whether the coin landed on heads or tails. The subjects placed in groups based on such meaningless associations between them have consistently been found to "act as if those sharing the meaningless labels were kin or close friends."[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granfalloon

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
4. Considering social media reaction as represtative
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 07:41 PM
Dec 2015

of what people are thinking is becoming a hallmark of lazy journalism.

wildeyed

(11,243 posts)
8. Wait, who even said this?
Thu Dec 31, 2015, 08:06 PM
Dec 2015

What do Amanda Hess and Alyssa Bereznak know about how minorities feel about Clinton's online presence? Neither are black, nor do they cover minority issues. So tell me why this article even exists and then why I should care?

They don't even bother to ASK a minority what they think. Pretty sure they could find a few who specialize in online political messaging to interview if they tried. She got two tweets from POC (BTW, go look at @blogdiva right now to see a PRO-Clinton tweet). TWEETS. Out of context too. That is just weak.

And then she trots out Killer Mike.... I can't even I see your Killer Mike and raise you a Young Jeezy!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Hillary Clinton’s Onl...